[Bug 338227] [NEW] should not muck about in /usr/local

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python2.6 Python (2.6.1-1ubuntu1) should not be mucking about in /usr/local: Setting up python2.6-minimal (2.6.1-1ubuntu1) ... mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/lib/python2.6': Permission denied dpkg: error processing python2.6-minimal (--config

[Bug 338367] [NEW] needs update for jaunty

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-jescs Currently, on Jaunty: $ sudo apt-get install evolution-jescs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an im

[Bug 338386] [NEW] segfault

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Updated to jaunty today. gnome-panel seems to be crashing pretty chronically. I will attach the latest. ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338386 Yo

[Bug 338386] Re: segfault

** Attachment added: "stack trace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23522316/foo -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

Re: [Bug 338367] Re: needs update for jaunty

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 19:59 +, J. Scott Gwin wrote: > have you tried to install through add/remove programs? Why? What's that got to do with anything? Clearly, the package that's available: $ apt-cache policy evolution-jescs evolution-jescs: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.24.0-0ubuntu2

Re: [Bug 338386] Re: segfault

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 19:33 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > Thanks for the report however the stacktrace you attached is pretty > broken and there's no clear indication on where the crash was, since > you're using jaunty and the crash is reproducible may you please report > the bug with apport?

Re: [Bug 338386] Re: segfault

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:05 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > the stacktrace attach to the bug is weird, could you copy the gdb crash > line to indicate where it's crashing, I'm not sure I know what you mean by the "gdb crash line". The stack trace I sent was collected from a core file. > it seem

Re: [Bug 338386] Re: segfault

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:59 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > I'm not sure I know what you mean by the "gdb crash line". > > the first line on the gdb prompt which gives you the codeline where it > crashed so we don't have to go through all the log to try figure which > one of the codepaths liste

[Bug 339244] [NEW] /etc/rcS.d/S11mountdevsubfs.sh calls domount incorrectly

Public bug reported: In the latest janunty, /etc/rcS.d/S11mountdevsubfs.sh tries to mount usbfs with: domount usbfs "" /dev/bus/usb/.usbfs -obusmode=0700,devmode=0600,listmode=0644 which is clearly incorrect according to domounts() API: # $1: file system type # $2: alternative file syst

[Bug 328665] Re: bond (i.e. wired and wireless) interfaces together for redundancy

** Attachment added: "prevent NetworkManager from IP configuring slave interfaces" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22556977/47_no_ip4_slave_if.patch -- bond (i.e. wired and wireless) interfaces together for redundancy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328665 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 328665] [NEW] bond (i.e. wired and wireless) interfaces together for redundancy

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager A bug is probably not the right place to post this, and there was some kind of design/wish document around somewhere about this but I can't find it at the moment. Anyway, the idea is to use the bonding module to bond the wired and wireles

[Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

So, I figured out what the cause of this is/was. Totem fails to work properly if it cannot connect to a DBUS. To reproduce my failure above, ssh to a remote machine and try to play an http:// URI in Totem. It should fail. Now try to do the same thing with dbus-launch: $ dbus-launch bash -c "to

Re: [Bug 321258] Re: [intrepid] Pidgin at times produces segfault. Valgrind included shows memory leaks.

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 23:32 +, Richard Seguin wrote: > What I am curious about is why my up to date intrepid doesn't produce > the same thing... Uhm. That valgrind log is from up-to-date Intrepid. That valgrind log is only from a short period of time and you can clearly see the leaks it prod

Re: [Bug 321258] Re: [intrepid] Pidgin at times produces segfault. Valgrind included shows memory leaks.

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 23:33 +, Richard Seguin wrote: > * Flagging as importance low at the moment as the theory at the moment > is that this is configuration specific. I am running an up to date > intrepid system and are not having the same trouble. So I'm imagining this: PID USER PR

Re: [Bug 321258] Re: [intrepid] Pidgin at times produces segfault. Valgrind included shows memory leaks.

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 23:38 +, Richard Seguin wrote: > What protocols are you using with pidgin? MSN, IRC, Jabber, ICQ. > When you move your .purple > directory can you try adding them one at a time to see which one causes > the crash? No. I am not going to do this. I think it is really qu

Re: [Bug 294259] Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1164 of file /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c

The two instances of this that I have experienced did not involve any hardware failures of any sort. The first instance was relatively painless as the filesystem was relatively empty. The second instance however took almost 24h to xfs_repair and I only did the repair so that I could get the data

[Bug 307472] Re: multiload-applet-2 leaks memory

So I'm going to ask again, as I kill my multiload applet yet again, can we have this backported to intrepid, please? -- multiload-applet-2 leaks memory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 99432] Re: wireless network not working now

@Scott Barker: I have the _exact_ same problem on the same wireless chipset as well as on another machine with ipw2200. Both intel chipsets FWIW. Did you ever resolve this issue? -- wireless network not working now https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99432 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 327907] [NEW] if-pre-up.d script needs to support "bridge" option

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wpasupplicant When using wpa_supplicant with a bonded (or bridge) interface one must invoke it with: # wpa_supplicant -i -b ... I believe this bridging (or bonding) mode is what the "wpa-iface" parameter in the /etc/network/interfaces file is all abou

[Bug 327907] Re: if-pre-up.d script needs to support "bridge" option

Hrm. On further examination, I do see: if [ -n "$IF_WPA_BRIDGE" ]; then WPA_SUP_OPTIONS="$WPA_SUP_OPTIONS -b $IF_WPA_BRIDGE" wpa_msg verbose "wpa-bridge $IF_WPA_BRIDGE" fi I wonder if specifying it explicitly vs. implicitly as I propose should be n

Re: [Bug 75028] Re: ospfd starts way too late in the boot process

On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 02:51 +, duanedesign wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been > any activity in it recently. No, there hasn't. Unless I am mistaken, it seems the ball is in your

[Bug 333297] [NEW] update to 7.19.3

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: curl Given that the latest stable release of curl is now 7.19.3 (http://curl.haxx.se/download.html) how about an update? ** Affects: curl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update to 7.19.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33329

[Bug 333328] [NEW] missing dbgsym package for 1.9.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9 There doesn't seem to be a dbgsym package for xulrunner-1.9 1.9.0.6 +nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1: $ apt-cache policy xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9: Installed: 1.9.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 Candidate: 1.9.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1

[Bug 333330] [NEW] 2.24.4 update for Intrepid please

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Given the huge plethora of bugs in the 2.24 release stream of evolution, could we please have an update to 2.24.4 (released weeks ago now) published for Intrepid? Intrepid's evolution has been quite a POS and getting the latest fixes would go a

[Bug 346959] [NEW] desktop size on multihead configurations doesn't work

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compizconfig-settings-manager Using compizconfig-settings-manager 0.8.2-0ubuntu1 on my dual-head (no xinerama) configuration, I cannot get the settings manager to configure 4 desktops on screen 1 if ccsm is run on screen 0. I can get it to configure any

[Bug 346964] [NEW] menu items selected from screen 1 open on screen 0

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel I have a dual head configuration (no xinerama) on current juanty. Any menu item chosen from a menu on screen 1 always opens on screen 0. If I direct a terminal window to open on screen 1 by manually setting it's DISPLAY variable then opening

Re: [Bug 346964] Re: menu items selected from screen 1 open on screen 0

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 282806 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282806 On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:28 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 282806 *** > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282806 > > Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has a

Re: [Bug 294259] Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1164 of file /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 08:19 +, Ronald van Engelen wrote: > > In spite of Brian's remarks I really think it was caused by the unique > hardware-failure inside the server (somehow it killed power to all > internal components). In my opinion, XFS is still rock solid (as long as > there's some jui

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:06 +, Steve Jackson wrote: > I echo what riban said. I'm likely to just disable the update-notifier > altogether rather than risk having ugly pop-unders (and maybe pop-overs > by mistake) happening in the middle of a presentation. Losing the > existing 'gentle' mechanis

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 19:29 +, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Nothing like a healthy debate. Indeed. So let's kick it off with where we stand right now and that's (afaik, correct me if I'm wrong) no notification icon anymore and an update-manager window that pops up once-a-week (in absence of cri

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:26 +, Iain Lane wrote: > > No, they pop in the background, unfocused. I personally don't think this > is the right behaviour either, but at least it's not disruptive in that > way. Nobody would be insane enough to try that ;) So hidden under all of the other windows t

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:33 +, Brian Curtis wrote: > Hi everybody, Discussion should probably be moved to the Ubuntuforums, > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1097110 Uhm, please no. I don't "interact" on web pages/forums. I don't have the time or attention to go check forums multip

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 14:21 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > ami_nakata and Peter Whittaker, your proposed rule about never opening > windows automatically is unworkable. > I didn't read all of Peter's very long comment

[Bug 357436] [NEW] firefox stalls on dns servfail

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 When I try to load a url for a hostname who's DNS server is returning SERVFAIL responses, the entire of firefox (i.e. not just a single tab) hangs/stalls. Try this URL: http://loadplus.de/. It should fail to load, but not before hanging up y

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:35 +, Carey Underwood wrote: > The existence of this bug should be noted in the release notes under > known issues as well as in the feature summary for "Ext4 filesystem > support". So basically, the fact that ext4 simply does not work in Ubuntu Jaunty should be in the

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 11:46 +, Carey Underwood wrote: > Because it's still being investigated, and 9.04 isn't actually > released yet. There's a perfectly good chance that the culprit is > nailed down and fixed before release, and if it can't, then simply > removing it from the final release n

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:42 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I'll note that part of the problem is that it doesn't seem to be > trivially reproducible even on Ubuntu Jaunty. It seems to reproduce here when two processes are removing files/trees from the same filesystem. And as another comment sugges

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 17:46 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > are people who can reproduce easily doing so with an > especially large or small amounts of memory? MemTotal: 2851296 kB MemFree:164428 kB Buffers:469320 kB Cached: 609504 kB SwapCached: 1780 kB Active:

[Bug 362861] [NEW] complete hang

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 When I tried to restart firefox it loaded all of the windows and tabs I had open and then just hung, long enough that I knew it was deadlocked and not going to make any further progress. I will attach the threaded stack trace. ** Affects: fi

[Bug 362861] Re: complete hang

** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25611918/ThreadStacktrace-firefox.txt -- complete hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

Re: [Bug 362861] Re: complete hang

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:14 +, Hilario J. Montoliu (hjmf) wrote: > Thank you for your report Brian Welcome. > Do you think this issue is reproducible? Absolutely. > If so, which are the steps to > reproduce it? Go to this URL: http://www.bobvila.com/DesignTools/DeckDesigner.html and follow

Re: [Bug 362861] Re: complete hang

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 18:15 +, Hilario J. Montoliu (hjmf) wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce the crash with neither sun-java6-plugin nor > icedtea6-plugin So the java application (a deck designer) actually starts and runs? > LC_ALL=posix apt-cache policy firefox sun-java6-plugin sun-java6-jre

Re: [Bug 362861] Re: complete hang

[ oops. this would be the previous comment that my last comment was referring to. i guess i didn't hit send. ] On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 17:44 +, Hilario J. Montoliu (hjmf) wrote: > Hi Brian, Hi, > Can you list your plugins/addons (it would be nice if you atach the > files extensions.rdf and

[Bug 327766] Re: bonobo-activation-server crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_type_check_instance_cast()

Yeah. I saw this too. I will attach the stacktrace. -- bonobo-activation-server crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 327766] Re: bonobo-activation-server crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_type_check_instance_cast()

** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24769813/ThreadStacktrace-libbonobo.txt -- bonobo-activation-server crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327766 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 359375] [NEW] frozen is right!

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Jaunty's current evolution, 2.26.0-0ubuntu4, with it's status "frozen" is certainly right. Frozen all the time on my system that is. Very shortly after starting evolution, now that I've been running with this new "test the latest tarball befor

[Bug 359375] Re: frozen is right!

** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25228115/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- frozen is right! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 359375] Re: frozen is right!

Oh, I should the latest is this on the terminal for the evolution process: *** glibc detected *** evolution: corrupted double-linked list: 0x0a29fd88 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb69dd07f] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb69deb8d] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__li

[Bug 359375] Re: frozen is right!

Here's more, just after restarting after the above mess. ** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25228199/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- frozen is right! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 359375] Re: frozen is right!

This release is pretty much useless. Read 2-3 messages before it locks up, then have to restart only to have it happen again. -- frozen is right! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349730] Re: Evolution freezes in Jaunty

The latest... *** glibc detected *** evolution: double free or corruption (out): 0x0afc84a0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb692c604] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x96)[0xb692e5b6] /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_free+0x36)[0xb6a61ff6] /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2[0xa

[Bug 349730] Re: Evolution freezes in Jaunty

This one locked up the desktop. I could not switch desktops or give another application focus. I had to ssh into the box, collect the stacktrace, then use "evolution --force-shutdown" to regain control of my desktop. ** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/252462

[Bug 349730] Re: Evolution freezes in Jaunty

Here's marking a few (IMAP) messages deleted and then expunging. It hung on the expunge. ** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25246239/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- Evolution freezes in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349730 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 317227] Re: skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

Here's another, without the "M" taint flag: [45822.947152] Bad page state in process 'vino-server' [45822.947155] page:c13136bc flags:0x4000 mapping: mapcount:-1 count:0 [45822.959359] Trying to fix it up, but a reboot is needed [45822.959360] Backtrace: [45823.983400] skb_over_panic:

[Bug 360146] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000028; IP: [] :jbd:__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+0x2f/0x80

Public bug reported: Got a kernel BUG followed by a number of subsequent ones in attachment: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0028; IP: [] :jbd:__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+0x2f/0x80 ht

[Bug 360146] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000028; IP: [] :jbd:__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+0x2f/0x80

** Attachment added: "foo" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25292563/foo -- BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0028; IP: [] :jbd:__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+0x2f/0x80 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360146 You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 317227] Re: skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 20:54 +, Stefan Richter wrote: > > It more likely means that nobody is here who knows the driver well > enough to suggest a fix. You could report to upstream: > net...@vger.kernel.org, Cc: Ayaz Abdulla > (forcedeth developer). Upstream will be more interested in report

[Bug 317227] Re: skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #13075 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13075 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13075 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: [1] SMP https:

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 09:26 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > > ami_nakata: Not only is it an implementation detail whether an > automatically-opening window is from a newly-running application or an > already-running application, it's an implementation detail whether *any* > window is from a ne

[Bug 351579] [NEW] cront script should observe _all_ of the admin users proxy variables

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt This is similar to bug 277493 but not a duplicate. The /etc/cron.daily/apt cron script set's some of the proxy configuration from the admin user's gconf configuration but it fails to set the no_proxy variable which maps to gconf's "ignore_hosts" key

[Bug 351579] Re: cront script should observe _all_ of the admin users proxy variables

Oops. Of course s/-n "no_proxy"/-n "$no_proxy"/, so, new patch: --- /tmp/apt.cron 2009-03-30 09:10:23.0 -0400 +++ /etc/cron.daily/apt 2009-03-30 09:10:32.0 -0400 @@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ if [ "$use" = "true" ] && [ -n "$host" ] && [ -n "$port" ]; then export ht

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 16:56 +, yaztromo wrote: > Theodore, > > I set an rm -rf going of multiple copies of "The High Voltage SID > collection", which in total is around 130,000 small files. At most two > tries is usually enough to trigger the soft lock. > > I'm compiling RC1 now, thanks to An

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 17:40 +, Andrius Štikonas wrote: > but my laptop is not > so fast ccache is your friend. Should most certainly be worth it for half a dozen kernel (re-)builds. b. -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 20:50 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > > Now that gives me one more argument to adopt the "instant messaging" > interaction pattern: users deal with IM every day. When they don't want > to be disturbed they set their status to "busy". We have support for > this in the FUSA

[Bug 306068] Re: [needs-packaging] Xpra

I read in another thread how to "me too" a bug without adding useless comments, but I forget what it told me to do. So here you have it, a useless comment with my vote for packaging this. -- [needs-packaging] Xpra https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306068 You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 07:37 +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: > > Not completely clear: do you have your IM open minimised windows in > front of you or what is your preferred method of being notified? No. I have two windows (I use pidgin) displayed all of the time. I never minimize them. One win

[Bug 265044] [NEW] evolution hangs

Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy evolution evolution: Installed: 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca hardy-updates/main Packa

[Bug 268331] [NEW] evolution-alarm-notifier being killed

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 evolution: Installed: 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.22.3.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca hardy-updates/main Packages 100

[Bug 397058] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

** Attachment added: "dmesg including sysrq-t and all other messages prior to and during lock up" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28801021/kernel_lock.txt -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397058 You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 397058] [NEW] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

Public bug reported: I've been experiencing lockups on the last few Karmic kernels. My less- than-informed opinion is that it's in NFS4 somewhere, given the stack traces and the soft lockup message at the end of traces: [ 5436.357006] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [10.75.22.3-mana:2489

[Bug 397058] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

Just got another one. Will attach the dmesg including stack traces. ** Attachment added: "dmesg including sysrq-t and all other messages prior to and during lock up - #2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28829033/kernel_lock2.txt -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 397058] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

This thread seems interesting with regard to this problem: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124677884816794&w=2 -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 357279] Re: picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2()

This bug report is over 4 months old. Has there been any progress at all? -- picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357279 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 357279] Re: picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2()

** Bug watch added: MusicBrainz Bug Tracker #4988 http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/4988 ** Also affects: picard via http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/4988 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2() https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 357279] Re: picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2()

Fix is at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~musicbrainz- developers/picard/trunk/revision/947#picard/musicdns/avcodec.c Would be nice if we could get a bugfix release in Jaunty. -- picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357279 You received this bug noti

[Bug 411602] [NEW] picard crashed with SIGSEGV in avcodec_decode_audio2()

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: picard This is basically just a pointer to bug 357279 and a request that the patch that fixes that (at least) be included in any future releases. I have tested the patch at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~musicbrainz- developers/picard/trunk/revision/947#pi

Re: [Bug 265044] Re: evolution hangs

On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:40 +, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote: > This bug was fixed in the package evolution-data-server - > 2.27.4-0ubuntu1 Yes, which will be in what release, Karmic? But as always this does nothing for the greatest mass of users which are all on the current stable release, Jau

Re: [Bug 397058] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

Have I filed this bug in the wrong place? Why, after all this time has there not been a single peep from a Ubuntu/Canonical bug triage person? Is Karmic going to get released with this known defect? Surely wouldn't be the first DOA release Ubuntu have done lately. Sadly. -- BUG: soft lockup -

[Bug 416090] [NEW] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image As filed in bug 397058 which seems to be getting ignored (so I'm assuming it's in the wrong place): I've been experiencing lockups on the last few Karmic kernels. My less- than-informed opinion is that it's in NFS4 somewhere, given the stack

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information / new update-manager behaviour is annoying

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:04 +, Rajeev Nair wrote: > > Any user who knows the admin password can install updates, That's a pretty long stretch -- assuming that all users have the admin password. This is *exactly* the mentality that has lead to millions of windows machines being exploited and

[Bug 397058] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s!

Not even a peep from the Ubuntu developers on this bug? Has this even been triaged yet? This is making the Karmic kernel *completely* useless for me. -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 346964] Re: menu items selected from screen 1 open on screen 0

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:50 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > the bug has been fixed upstream now > Excellent. Will that fix be backported to Jaunty, seeing how that's the release we are all using currently? -- menu items selected from screen 1 open on screen 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3

[Bug 56846] Re: environment in reports can contain sensitive information

I'd like to do a bit more auditing to see if I can help come up with solutions. Can you give me a quick lesson on decoding the base64 encoded core dump? I tried to strip out just the (very long single line) base64 string and process it with: $ openssl enc -d -base64 < /tmp/foo.base64 >/tmp/foo.b

[Bug 56950] [Bug-tar] tar 1.15.91 attempting to get to files not within --one-file-system

Public bug reported: See this thread for details: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2006-06/msg00020.html There is a patch in the third message with a patch to fix this problem. Can we have it applied? It would be interesting to know if the tar maintainers have applied it but I can't se

[Bug 56951] Unexpected field value in snapshot file

Public bug reported: A description and patch can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-tar@gnu.org/msg00892.html It would be nice to get this verified, and applied, or push upstream to apply, and make a new release. ** Affects: tar (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: U

[Bug 27052] Re: Must reboot after timeout. Screen blacks out with no recovery available.

I am having this problem lately with very up-to-date edgy. I have a dual-head display with a Matrox G400 on screen 0 and an ATI 3D Rage IIC on screen 1. I am not using Xinerama. If I have the gnome-screensaver running and the gnome-power-manager set to put the display to sleep, once they have do

[Bug 56951] Re: Unexpected field value in snapshot file

I'm not sure of the disposition of the Importance being Wishlist, but this is an actual bug in gnu tar, not just a requested feature. This bug prevents, for example, the Amanda backup system from functioning properly. -- Unexpected field value in snapshot file https://launchpad.net/bugs/56951 -

[Bug 57033] new version and bad dependency on existing version

Public bug reported: Two bugs really, well, one bug and one wishlist item, but the wishlist item makes the bug moot I'd think. The current dvdrip suffers from this: The following packages have unmet dependencies: dvdrip: Depends: libgtk-pixbuf-perl but it is not installable E: Broken packages

[Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: environment in reports can contain sensitive information

raceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apport-unpack", line 35, in ? pr.load(open(report)) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/problem_report.py", line 56, in load (key, value) = line.split(':', 1) ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpac

[Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: [Bug 56846] Re: environment in reports can contain sensitive information

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 17:06 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Brian J. Murrell [2006-08-21 19:01 -]: > > I got this from it: > > > > /tmp/foo$ apport-unpack /var/crash/_bin_bash.1001.crash . > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > Fil

[Bug 66595] crash on startup

Public bug reported: My desktop session crashed out and when I came back in rhythmbox crashed on restart. I will attach the crash report here. It sucks that you can't attach a crash report to a new bug. :-( ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed

[Bug 66595] Re: crash on startup

** Attachment added: "apport crash" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4886914/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1001.crash -- crash on startup https://launchpad.net/bugs/66595 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 66595] Re: crash on startup

No other issues that I am aware of at the moment. -- crash on startup https://launchpad.net/bugs/66595 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 67382] RFE: a bit more flexibility in handling modified files

Public bug reported: I just finished doing an update of gdm through update-manager. I was thoroughly impressed with the fact that I got a graphical "keep/replace" window complete with a diff of the gdm.conf file which I had previously edited. Can I make a couple of suggestions to enhance that ex

[Bug 59129] not using libgnomeprint[ui]?

Public bug reported: In Edgy, I opened a PS document with evince with the hope to print (IOW: convert) to PDF and found that the print dialog is not the same as most other gnome apps. It doesn't look like gnome-print (libgnomeprint[ui] that is). So, I used ldd to see what libs evince (0.6.0 btw)

[Bug 59129] Re: not using libgnomeprint[ui]?

But evince and (for example) gedit are using the same version of libgtk (libgtk2.0-0 2.10.2-0ubuntu) yet have different print dialogs and gedit still links to libgnomeprint[ui} and has a Create a PDF Document option which evince doesn't have. I don't suppose I really much care about why the dialog

[Bug 59129] Re: not using libgnomeprint[ui]?

Ahhh. > Corey, that's not libgnomeprint to GTK but a new printing code libgnomeprint was not "merged" into GTK then, but GTK developed their own printing code along with their own dialog? > Brian, applications have to use the new API, so it requires some work. Indeed. See, the way it seemed to

[Bug 59343] mono crashing with both tomboy and f-spot

Public bug reported: both f-spot and tomboy (mono apps) seem to be crashing in edgy. i will attach the crash data to this bug (if i can figure out how that is done). ** Affects: mono (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- mono crashing with both tomboy and f-spot h

[Bug 59343] Re: mono crashing with both tomboy and f-spot

** Attachment added: "crash report" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4166354/_usr_bin_mono.1001.crash -- mono crashing with both tomboy and f-spot https://launchpad.net/bugs/59343 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 59343] Re: mono crashing with both tomboy and f-spot

tomboy seems to be working again. i just killed gnome-panel (again) and this time it restarted. f-spot is still crashing mono though: $ f-spot Starting new FSpot server X Mono.Data.SqliteClient.SqliteSyntaxException: file is encrypted or is not a database at Mono.Data.SqliteClient.SqliteC

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >