[Bug 306321] [NEW] printing doesn't complete

2008-12-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I am using Intrepid with an HP PSC 750 printer. Most times I print, the page does not complete and eject when the print job is done. I can usually go to the printer and hit the cancel button and the job will finish and the page will eject. Frequently after I have used the t

[Bug 306321] Re: printing doesn't complete

2008-12-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add, if I wait long enough (i.e. tens of minutes) the printer will finally finish the last few passes of the printhead and kick the page out, complete. It's of course annoying to have to wait. Alternatively, if a subsequent print jobs is queued while one is sitting waiting to kick the pa

[Bug 130941] Re: gdm Xsession not sourcing .xprofile (anymore)

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
If you go back and read the original comment you will see we are talking about sourcing ~/.xprofile, not ~/.profile. -- gdm Xsession not sourcing .xprofile (anymore) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 306557] [NEW] won't open an http uri

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: totem Release: Intrepid, x86 (i.e. 32bit) Maybe this is a PEBKAC and I'm just expecting things to be too intuitive, but trying something as simple as: totem http://site/path/to/video.mp4 doesn't actually stream and play the video. Totem reports: $ to

[Bug 306560] [NEW] won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin I have my Intrepid system here configured in gnome to use pulseaudio. Now I am finding that none of the sound options (i.e. Automatic, ESD, Alsa) in pidgin work any more. If I choose Command and then configure it for "paplay %s", that works, but

Re: [Bug 306560] Re: won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:13 +, goto wrote: > What Ubuntu Version do you use? > > Here on 64 bit Intrepid I cannot reproduce it. What method do you have your pidgin defined to use? -- won't play sounds with pulseaudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306560 You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:30 +, goto wrote: > Just for information: I am on 64 Intrepid and here it works. Great. > One example: > totem > http://ftp.gui.uva.es/pub/multimedia/movies/elephantsdream/elephantsdream-720-h264-st-aac.mov > And I see the video. Or did I understand you not correctly

Re: [Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 18:01 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > does gst-launch playbin uri=url works ok? No. $ gst-launch playbin uri=http://ftp.gui.uva.es/pub/multimedia/movies/elephantsdream/elephantsdream-720-h264-st-aac.mov Setting pipeline to PAUSED ... Pipeline is PREROLLING ... ERROR: fr

[Bug 306560] Re: won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
$ gconftool-2 -R /system/gstreamer/0.10/default videosink = autovideosink chataudiosink = halaudiosink udi=/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_10de_26c_sound_card_0_oss_pcm_0_0 musicaudiosink_description = PulseAudio Sound Server audiosrc = halaudiosrc udi=/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_10de_2

[Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
An update... Those errors were because the shell I was executing from didn't have the env. variable pointing to the pulseaudio server. If I do: $ PULSE_SERVER=10.75.22.1 gst-launch playbin uri=http://ftp.gui.uva.es/pub/multimedia/movies/elephantsdream/elephantsdream-720-h264 -st-aac.mov It does

[Bug 306560] Re: won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
~sigh~ I opened the Pulse volume control applet and noticed that pidgin was connected to the audio server, but it was stuck there. I quit pidgin and restarted it and it seems to be working now. There might be some kind of bug lingering that was causing it's connection to pulseaudio to be hung up

Re: [Bug 306560] Re: won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:10 +, goto wrote: > Okay, glad to hear it's working now. Do you think we can close the bug > as "Invalid" now? Well, as I said, there was the issue that the pidgin connection to pulse appeared to be stuck. i.e. it showed permanently in the volume control, not just whe

Re: [Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 20:23 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > not a totem issue then, re assigning to pulseaudio, thanks. I think you are totally missing the point. This has nothing to do with pulseaudio. The only reason I even mentioned it was to clarify why the "gst-launch playbin" failed pr

Re: [Bug 306560] Re: won't play sounds with pulseaudio

2008-12-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 21:16 +, Chris Coulson wrote: > > Could you please change your Pidgin settings back to their defaults, by > going to Edit -> Preferences, clicking on the Sound tab, and changing > "Method" back to "Automatic". I had already done that before I reported back a few comments

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So here we are... all extensions disabled and another segfault: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7ddb6c0 (LWP 21047)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfeb05dc, s=0x9bcbda0, aParticipant=0x8e0f39c) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleColl

[Bug 296808] [NEW] gc_approx reports Not_found

2008-11-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: approx When I run gc_approx I simply get: Not_found And no space is freed up. ** Affects: approx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gc_approx reports Not_found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296808 You received this bug noti

[Bug 296801] [NEW] /var/cache/approx/.lost+found: Permission denied

2008-11-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: approx When I have my approx cache on it's own filesystem, gc_approx complains: /var/cache/approx/.lost+found: Permission denied I think approx should either except explicitly known filesystem artifacts such as lost+found, or simply skip over directorie

[Bug 31425] Re: garbled or no video output after resume from suspend (Inspiron 4150)

2008-11-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Using a small variation of the two scripts in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi- support/+bug/31425/comments/14: #!/bin/bash statedir=/root/s3/state mkdir -p $statedir chvt 2 sleep 1 vbetool vbestate save >$statedir/vbe curcons=`fgconsole` fuser /dev/tty$curcons 2>/dev/null|xargs p

[Bug 75618] Re: Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf

2008-11-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
It's still reproducible in Intrepid, yes. -- Complains about IPv6 entries in resolv.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 303869] [NEW] STABLE10 available, coss support not stable, use negotiate

2008-11-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid3 A few issues: STABLE10 is now available. Why not use that instead of STABLE8? Building STABLE10 here reports: coss/CossSwapDir.h:1:2: error: #error COSS Support is not stable in 3.0. Please do not use. So, coss should be removed from --enable-

Re: [Bug 249824] Re: [intrepid] IPv6 unusable

2008-12-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 23:22 +, Manson Thomas wrote: > Will anybody have the decency to answer ? any ubuntero here ? > > I had to disable my secondary DNS server for dozens of .fr. domains > because of this bug. > > Some people are becoming upset and I totally agree with that. > > Please, giv

Re: [Bug 203159] Re: trackerd crashed with SIGSEGV in index_mail_messages_by_summary_file

2008-12-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 06:29 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: > Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 or 9.04? I would not know about 9.04. That's not a final release. That's not to say that I don't run the development releases, but I jumped into Intrepid before it was done and have been regretti

Re: [Bug 249824] Re: [intrepid] IPv6 unusable

2008-12-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:29 +, Matt LaPlante wrote: > > Subscribers, please test the proposed patch as thoroughly as possible to > increase its chances of acceptance. I only needed the dnsutils package (for dig, host, etc.) but that worked just great for me. -- [intrepid] IPv6 unusable http

[Bug 257404] Re: hangs when notifying of an incoming connection

2008-11-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I'm using the ekiga 3.0.0 snapshots currently (i.e. not the ekiga from ubuntu) but given the number of evo address book hangs in other various applications, I would tend to day that yes, this is probably still an issue. -- hangs when notifying of an incoming connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 268331] Re: evolution-alarm-notifier being killed

2008-11-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 09:27 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > did you send the bug to GNOME? Yes. Bug number 557449. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #557449 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557449 ** Also affects: evolution via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5574

[Bug 301688] [NEW] sigabrt

2008-11-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Just got a SIGABRT in firefox 3.0.4. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sigabrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 301688] Re: sigabrt

2008-11-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "full back trace of abort" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19905785/foo -- sigabrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 173050] Re: update-manager does not correctly interpret gnome proxy configuration [gutsy]

2008-11-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I am still seeing this broken on Intrepid. Any ETA on when this will be fixed? This behavior is quite anti-social to one's local networking infrastructure, unnecessarily overloading HTTP proxy servers when proxying is supposed to be excepted for the provided apt servers. -- update-manager does

[Bug 303157] [NEW] SIGABRT

2008-11-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-jescs When I try to delete a meeting from a jescs calendar the evolution-jescs process aborts with the following stack: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0xb6095b90 (LWP 25534)] 0xb7f2e430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (g

[Bug 303157] Re: SIGABRT

2008-11-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Filed at bugzilla.gnome.org as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562568 -- SIGABRT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com h

[Bug 249824] Re: [intrepid] IPv6 unusable

2008-11-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, please. Do a backport to Intrepid. dnsutils is useless (in a network with only IP6 dns servers) on Intrepid without this fix. -- [intrepid] IPv6 unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 303737] [NEW] doesn't accept ipv6 server specificiation

2008-11-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp I'm trying to migrate (as much as possible) to using IPv6 here in my LAN. I have the network configured and many services now using it, however when I try to add my IPv6 NTP server to the ntp.conf ntpd fails to connect to it. First attempt was by ho

Re: [Bug 339783] Re: Separate X-screen, apps launched from 2nd screen appear on first screen

2009-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 290935 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290935 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 13:39 +, Alex F wrote: > I think these are separate issues, because I remain affected by > this(339783) and 346964 but I have never experienced 290935. My gnome- > panels themselves

[Bug 306557] Re: won't open an http uri

2009-01-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So, no? Having a completely, reproducible-at-will-100%-of-the-time bug is not enough to try to solve it? Somebody else has to "confirm" it as a bug first? That's plain silly. How many open bugs do you folks have where there are no reproducers or such? Here I have one I can reproduce at will an

Re: [Bug 321258] Re: segfault

2009-01-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:30 +, Richard Seguin wrote: > More specifically, in that link there will be another to obtain a > valgrind log, please attach that as a separate attachment Well, yeah. There is definitely a memory leak in pidgin: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM

[Bug 234503] Re: mythtv + default compiz = no window borders in windowed mode

2009-06-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Yes, here too, on Jaunty. Same thing. No window decorations in windowed mode. Will this bug even be triaged? -- mythtv + default compiz = no window borders in windowed mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-06-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:55 +, Toralv wrote: > I think it's rather communistic of those responsible for this change to > impose their personal preference on everybody. Hrm. You don't seem to understand the concept of communism and are making the common mistake of calling what you characterize

[Bug 392346] [NEW] needs update to 0.9.4

2009-06-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: oprofile Version 0.9.4 has been released for nearly a year now and fixes the bug I am seeing with 0.9.3 in Jaunty: $ sudo opreport opreport error: basic_string::erase Please update. ** Affects: oprofile (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Stat

Re: [Bug 333297] Re: update to 7.19.3

2009-06-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:55 +, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and help to improve > Ubuntu. You are welcome. > Karmic currently has curl 7.19.4, and 7.19.5 is soon to follow, so I'm > closing this bug as resolved. But I didn't open this bug on Karm

Re: [Bug 346964] Re: menu items selected from screen 1 open on screen 0

2009-06-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 18:56 +, LaChild wrote: > The patched fixed it for me. Great. > Thanks for all the hard work, now we just need to get it patched > upstream in time for Karmic Koala! :D Uhm. And fixed ASAP for Jaunty. That's what most of the leading edge Ubuntu userbase are all using.

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

2009-07-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:35 +, Stefan Bader wrote: > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jaunty) >Status: In Progress => Fix Committed Which kernel? Can you paste the changelog entry? -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28

2009-07-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 23:32 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > We might have a break in this bug. For those people who can reliably > reproduce the problem, are you using ecryptfs, possibly extensively? Not at all here. But I rolled back to using ext4dev with the Intrepid kernel and now have leapfro

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-05-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 17:00 +, Richard Thomas wrote: > Also I would like to point out that if you make use of virtual desktops > feature > I have 9 desktops It very very easy to miss the pop up as on my machine it > shows on desktop one > while i tend work on other desktops and have firefox

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-05-04 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 16:12 +, scar wrote: > open the update manager on > all desktops at least Oh yeah, that's much better. Annoying * $number_of_desktops. Talk about getting right in somebody's face. Surely it's obvious by now that this was a very ill-thought out decision. I've said

[Bug 363383] [NEW] consumes a lot of CPU

2009-04-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I am running current jaunty with: $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg xserver-xorg: Installed: 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 Candidate: 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 Version table: *** 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca jaunty/main Packages 100

Re: [Bug 362861] Re: complete hang

2009-04-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 18:57 +, Hilario J. Montoliu (hjmf) wrote: > > However you can install the debug symbols for firefox, and xulrunner > from http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/f/firefox-3.0/, > http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/x/xulrunner-1.9/. Why are these not in the same repository a

Re: [Bug 363383] Re: consumes a lot of CPU

2009-04-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 15:02 +, Chris Coulson wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. High CPU usage in Xorg is unlikely to be a XOrg bug. It's > more likely to be due to another application you're running using lots > of expensive calls. F

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:34 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > Philippe, if we made only changes that were welcome to everybody, we > wouldn't have changed anything since Ubuntu 4.10. s/everybody/most people/ or s/everybody/majority of users/ as I think the original intention of "everybody" was m

Re: [Bug 340071] Re: /etc/rcS.d/S07resolvconf is too early

2009-05-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 05:51 +, Wladimir Mutel wrote: > Probably that's why it is strongly recommended to point your > /etc/resolvconf/run to /lib/init/rw/resolvconf *I* should do that? I've never pointed it anywhere. The package has decided where it should be and put it there. > /lib/init/

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-05-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 22:19 +, Ricardo Pérez López wrote: > Interestingly, the client of the Canonical's recently released UbuntuOne > service puts a persistent applet icon in the notification area: > > https://ubuntuone.com/support/installation/ Well, I don't see any evidence there one way o

[Bug 321258] Re: [intrepid] Pidgin at times produces segfault. Valgrind included shows memory leaks.

2009-02-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So is anything going to be done about this pidgin leaking memory like a sieve? My pidgin crashes every couple of days due to it OOMing. I did go to some pains to get that valgrind log at your request. Please use it and fix the leaks. Please. -- [intrepid] Pidgin at times produces segfault. Va

[Bug 239999] Re: nm should support easy bonding

2009-02-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, that patch is mine. It's a patch to NM that prevents the IP configuration steps on a "slave" (i.e. bonded) interface. This allows you to create a bonded interface in /etc/network/interfaces (bug #328665 has an example of how to do this) but still let's NM select a wireless network to connec

[Bug 367619] [NEW] oops in :nf_conntrack:nf_ct_remove_expectations+0x45/0x70

2009-04-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I got this oops: [766987.341056] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 1304bbeb [766987.347465] IP: [] :nf_conntrack:nf_ct_remove_expectations+0x45/0x70 [766987.354823] Oops: [#1] SMP [766987.358177] Modules linked in: usblp isofs udf crc_itu_t btusb nls_iso88

[Bug 317227] Re: skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

2009-04-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
There has been an updated comment on the upstream bug tracker. -- skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: [1] SMP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 328575] Re: Cannot start gnome-terminal because of gconf error

2009-04-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Aw crap! Now I'm going to have to go back to Intrepid. Not being able to open a gnome-terminal over an ssh connection is a show stopper for me! ~sigh~ It's been too long now since I have been able to do a Ubuntu upgrade and everything just works as well as it did before the "upgrade". Please f

[Bug 367619] Re: oops in :nf_conntrack:nf_ct_remove_expectations+0x45/0x70

2009-04-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
My Jaunty machine just oops again with this panic: [94081.221055] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 050d7442 [94081.227408] IP: [] :nf_conntrack:death_by_timeout+0x9a/0xd0 [94081.233909] Oops: [#1] SMP [94081.237184] Modules linked in: nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat usb_storage

[Bug 373029] [NEW] just exits after short while

2009-05-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: indicator-applet So, ever since upgrading to Jaunty, I have yet to see [anything in] this indicator applet. So I decided to go fishing today to see if I could figure out why. I certainly have the indicator applet process running but I see nothing in my

Re: [Bug 328575] Re: Cannot start gnome-terminal because of gconf error

2009-04-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 13:39 +, Pibo wrote: > @ Adam Yao: > could you please be more specific? Are you meaning that you've found some > applications other than the root terminal which undergo this GConf's issue, > or that the fact the terminal is unusable affects other activities of yours? >

Re: [Bug 328575] Re: Cannot start gnome-terminal because of gconf error

2009-04-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:44 +, bjd wrote: > Been following these comments -- all the while finding myself more and more > dumbfounded. This bug is over two months old. More and more bugs lately seem to befall this fate sadly, of just lingering on and on and nothing being done. > There's anoth

[Bug 337629] Re: weather indicator in the time/date applet does not keep up to date

2009-05-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Sebastien, What happens if I am not using NM to manage my connection? I am in a very static, wired-only network here, and TBH, the "Debian way" (/etc/network/interfaces) seems entirely sufficient to manage the network connections. Further, the idea that the network comes up only when the desktop

[Bug 378187] [NEW] vino-server child processes die and respawn rapidly

2009-05-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vino On my up-to-date Jaunty system, vino-server seems to be stuck in a loop of spawning a child only to have that child die immediately, at which point it spawns a new one. Notice: $ while true; do ps -ef | grep vino | grep -v grep; done brian27573

Re: [Bug 337629] Re: weather indicator in the time/date applet does not keep up to date

2009-05-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:09 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > the applet should get the informations correctly if the network is > working when it starts, nm is nice to know about connection changes > though Yeah. I removed everything network-manager and indeed, it does seem to get updates, once I

[Bug 339244] Re: /etc/rcS.d/S11mountdevsubfs.sh calls domount incorrectly

2009-03-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
BTW: if you do a clean reboot with the arguments of the mount quoted as I suggested in the previous comment, that script fails to mount any of the filesystems with domount. This indicates that there is a bug in domount or the callers of it. Quoting the arguments of "mount" should not affect it's b

[Bug 338367] Re: needs update for jaunty

2009-03-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Is there an owner for this package? Will a new one be getting rolled any time soon for jaunty? -- needs update for jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing lis

[Bug 340071] [NEW] /etc/rcS.d/S07resolvconf is too early

2009-03-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: resolvconf In current jaunty, resolvconf is started in /etc/rcS.d/S07resolvconf. This is before local filesystems are mounted however. The result is that if /var/ is on it's own filesystem, $RUN_DIR(=/etc/resolvconf/run) is pointing to a directory that

[Bug 340071] Re: /etc/rcS.d/S07resolvconf is too early

2009-03-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
And of course, that /var/run is a tmpfs makes this problem all the more interesting. I'm not really sure where the popcorn trail on that leads. -- /etc/rcS.d/S07resolvconf is too early https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 340454] [NEW] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in e_source_list_peek_groups()

2009-03-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Please don't ask for an apport report. See bug 94130. ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in e_source_list_peek_groups() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34045

[Bug 340454] Re: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in e_source_list_peek_groups()

2009-03-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23717548/foo -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in e_source_list_peek_groups() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 340456] [NEW] evolution-data-server-2.26 crashed with signal 5 in g_mutex_free_posix_impl()

2009-03-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-data-server Please don't ask for an apport report. See bug 94130 and 107103. ** Affects: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution-data-server-2.26 crashed with signal 5 in g_mutex_free_posix

[Bug 340456] Re: evolution-data-server-2.26 crashed with signal 5 in g_mutex_free_posix_impl()

2009-03-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23717629/foo -- evolution-data-server-2.26 crashed with signal 5 in g_mutex_free_posix_impl() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340456 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 190995] Re: /dev/disk/by-uuid pointing to real device, not a device-mapper encapsulation

2009-03-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
evms appears to be the culprit of taking over the /dev/sda* devices. I removed it and this problem has gone away. -- /dev/disk/by-uuid pointing to real device, not a device-mapper encapsulation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 339244] Re: /etc/rcS.d/S11mountdevsubfs.sh calls domount incorrectly

2009-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 10:10 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > This line does not appear in the current jaunty file. Hrm. Interesting. How can I get a copy of the current jaunty file? Probably a dpkg argument? What about the other component of this bug report however? That all of the domount(

[Bug 340628] [NEW] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [unlink:13830]

2009-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I got a soft lockup while trying to delete files from an ext4 filesystem on 2.6.28-8.28: [94007.172003] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [rm:11764] [94007.173005] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [unlink:13830] [94072.669004] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 6

Re: [Bug 339244] Re: /etc/rcS.d/S11mountdevsubfs.sh calls domount incorrectly

2009-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:58 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > You can "get a copy" by extracting the deb using dpkg-deb. Yes. Indeed. I got the copy with dpkg -x in fact. The usbfs stuff was added by me a while ago for virtualbox. I don't think it's needed any more. > That's not important.

[Bug 294154] [NEW] hangs when seeking in a track

2008-11-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Using Intrepid, when moving the slider (i.e. seeking in a track that is playing) I get a lock up. I will attach a stack trace. ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hangs when seeking in a track ht

[Bug 294154] Re: hangs when seeking in a track

2008-11-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19388688/foo -- hangs when seeking in a track https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 290355] Re: pidgin hangs on address book lookup

2008-11-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I got another hang. Seems to happen on incoming jabber messages from a certain server. ** Attachment added: "ThreadStackTrace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19390122/foo -- pidgin hangs on address book lookup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290355 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 294259] [NEW] XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1164 of file /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c

2008-11-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Got this on my Intrepid (2.6.27-7) last night: Nov 4 17:25:55 pc kernel: [10142.198218] Filesystem "dm-25": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1164 of file /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xf95840c9 Nov 4 17:25:56 pc kernel: [10142.198240]

[Bug 286155] [NEW] segfault in PL_DHashTableOperate

2008-10-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox I have been seeing many firefox 3 crashes lately. Finally decided to hook gdb up to firefox in an effort to figure out where these crashes are coming from. Here's what I found: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to

[Bug 286205] [NEW] got SIGABRT

2008-10-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Another firefox3 crash. This time gdb reported: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0xb2cffb90 (LWP 10452)] 0xb7f84430 in __kernel_vsyscall () Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) where #0 0xb7f84430 in __kern

[Bug 286155] Re: segfault in PL_DHashTableOperate

2008-10-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add, firefox is up to date on this installation: $ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/

[Bug 286205] Re: got SIGABRT

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This was actually in firefox-3.0. -- got SIGABRT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u

[Bug 286155] Re: segfault in PL_DHashTableOperate

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This should be changed from firefox to firefox-3.0 -- segfault in PL_DHashTableOperate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286155 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 286366] [NEW] segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Firefox 3 sefaulted on me yet again. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7dd66c0 (LWP 31377)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfaab9fc, s=0xda1d520, aParticipant=0x9253c84) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:

[Bug 286466] [NEW] crash

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Not sure why this crashed. It just did. I will attach some apport generated data... ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286466 You received this bug notific

[Bug 286466] Re: crash

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "threaded stack trace" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18735906/ThreadStacktrace -- crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b

[Bug 286466] Re: crash

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
evolution: Installed: 2.24.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.24.0-0ubuntu3 Version table: 2.24.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://apt.interlinx.bc.ca intrepid/main Packages *** 2.24.0-0ubuntu2 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Seems I am one rev. out of date but I don't think the new rev. fixed an

Re: [Bug 286466] Re: crash

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:12 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: > why you don't install the released package? Ahhh. I didn't notice this item in the changelog before: * debian/patches/90_update_svn_version.patch: - update the code to the current svn version so it gets testing before the

[Bug 107103] Re: should try to sanitize passwords from attachments

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Martin, Seriously? "Yes, it's a problem but we don't know how to fix it, so we will just close it"? As for "https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/crash-reporting"; that does not solve the problem. My passwords are still in LP's database and only as safe as LP is secure (which I have no reason to b

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Not at will. It happens fairly frequently though. Several times a day. Here's another one: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7de66c0 (LWP 14458)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfcb98ac, s=0xb04b8268, aParticipant=0x98a5c84) at nsCycleCollector.cpp

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
For posterity, another: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7d406c0 (LWP 22826)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbf813e5c, s=0xa2a5540, aParticipant=0x8dc53f4) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or directory.

[Bug 287086] [NEW] sigabort

2008-10-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Another firefox 3 crash. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0xb7c526c0 (LWP 8173)] 0xb7f2e430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) where #0 0xb7f2e430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7c7f880 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Here's another with a full backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7ccd6c0 (LWP 20164)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfba390c, s=0xa152c28, aParticipant=0xb7bdcd00) at nsCycleCollector.cpp:1287 1287nsCycleCollector.cpp: No such file or dir

[Bug 289377] [NEW] segfault

2008-10-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 I know this is a crash in flash-nonfree and I know that it's a closed source application, etc., etc. But I think you cannot disagree that having a working flash on a Linux desktop is a pretty common and important requirement. There is (unfor

[Bug 289838] [NEW] segfault in malloc_consolidate

2008-10-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Intrepid updated as of 26 Oct. 2008: Stack trace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb62d6940 (LWP 22733)] 0xb6892c92 in malloc_consolidate () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) thread apply all bt full Thread 8511 (Thread 0xb2ef

[Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-10-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Here's another. Boy it's going to be fun times if Intrepid is released with this bug still in it given how often it hits me. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7cb36c0 (LWP 18297)] GCGraphBuilder::AddNode (this=0xbfa86fec, s=0xf8a3140, aParticipant=0xb7bc

Re: [Bug 107103] Re: should try to sanitize passwords from attachments

2008-10-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:58 +, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi Brian, Hi Martin, > Right. Just to be clear, I am not *really* happy about sending core > dumps either, but it's currently the only practical method to get any > helpful information out of most crashes. Understood. > If the stack trace

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:10 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > do you have any website that regularaly triggers this? No, it's not a per-website thing. Looking at the stack traces, it appears to be garbage collection to me. I tend to think garbage collection happens more based on needs than particul

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:28 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > tabmix and resizable textarea are probably good candidates. Disabling tabmix renders FF3 useless for me as it is the only thing that returns me to productivity quickly when FF3 crashes, which it is doing many times a day. If I had to try

Re: [Bug 286366] Re: segfault in GCGraphBuilder::AddNode

2008-11-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:29 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > hey, we try to track down a bug here and not start fundamental debats. I'm not trying to start any debates, just tell you what problems I have with the process of trying to find this bug. The bottom line is that it takes a while for FF3 t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >