So, no? Having a completely, reproducible-at-will-100%-of-the-time bug is not enough to try to solve it? Somebody else has to "confirm" it as a bug first? That's plain silly.
How many open bugs do you folks have where there are no reproducers or such? Here I have one I can reproduce at will and you're not interested? -- won't open an http uri https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
