Bhavani Shankar [2010-11-27 8:12 -]:
> Sorry martin for the hiccup... I thought FTBFS can also be sru'ed
No need to apologize, to the contrary. I actually felt bad turning
down this down, but I think we shouldn't impose the risk and overhead
of an update where there is no user-visible advanta
Sorry martin for the hiccup... I thought FTBFS can also be sru'ed
apologies again
regards
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> What's the rationale to fix this in an SRU without any "real" changes?
> The binary package exists in maverick, after all, in the current
> version.
>
