Sorry martin for the hiccup... I thought FTBFS can also be sru'ed apologies again
regards On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > What's the rationale to fix this in an SRU without any "real" changes? > The binary package exists in maverick, after all, in the current > version. > > If we have something real to fix to the package, this can (and needs to) > be applied as well, of course, but by its own it doesn't really buy us > anything, just imposes the risk of a regression. > > ** Changed in: libdbd-sqlite3-perl (Ubuntu Maverick) > Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix > > -- > SRU to fix libdbd-sqlite3-perl ftbfs in maverick > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631308 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “libdbd-sqlite3-perl” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > Status in “libdbd-sqlite3-perl” source package in Maverick: Won't Fix > > Bug description: > Buildlogs: > > http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/libdbd-sqlite3-perl_1.29-2_lubuntu32.buildlog > > http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/64/libdbd-sqlite3-perl_1.29-2_lubuntu64.buildlog > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdbd-sqlite3-perl/+bug/631308/+subscribe > -- Bhavani Shankar.R https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community developer. What matters in life is application of mind!, It makes great sense to have some common sense..! -- SRU to fix libdbd-sqlite3-perl ftbfs in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
