Thanks for your suggestion. The changes you are requesting require more
discussion, which should be done on an appropriate mailing list or
forum. http://www.ubuntu.com/community/forums/ might be a good start.
"No user permissions had been defined" would indicate that the file has
no permission and
For example, SELinux is not installed by default, the user will have to
install it, and enable it at boot-time configuration, so the user will
see the SELinux Context field to contain a valid selinux information,
but not in the case of Last Changed files, which will still display
"unknown" if the u
It's hard to know what the "unknown" message is pertaining to,
a user will think the other way when they saw a word "unknown" on their files,
it means that it is an indication that some features are not enabled and some
packages are needed to be installed to enable that feature to display those
Thank you for your bug. When do you get that "unknown"? Why do you think
it's misleading to say that the permissions are not known? What in that
word make think to other programs the users probably don't know about?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Assigne
My bad, I forgot about (_("this things")); are translatable.
--
Use a more sensible message for "unknown" in permission tab.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82397
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I tried creating a patch for it, but I can't reflect any changes,
probably because of the translations for unknown.
** Attachment added: "Sensible permission message (wannabe patch)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5982517/12_sensible_permission_message.patch
--
Use a more sensible message for
