Re: [Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2007-07-10 Thread Daniel Allen
On 7/10/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Network cards are assigned persistent names the first time they are > inserted, and they keep that name forever after unless you manually > modify /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules (gutsy onwards) or > /etc/iftab (feisty and bef

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2007-07-10 Thread Ketil Malde
Scott James Remnant: > the suggested log message would be output every time on boot anyway I'm not quite sure which suggestion you refer to, but the way I see it, providing some information in the case where there is a mismatch between the interfaces listed in /etc/iftab and interfaces present on

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2007-07-10 Thread Scott James Remnant
Network cards are assigned persistent names the first time they are inserted, and they keep that name forever after unless you manually modify /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules (gutsy onwards) or /etc/iftab (feisty and before). This is correct behaviour; since most modern laptops have two

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-11-03 Thread Ketil Malde
Just to say 'me too'. (I've marked my bug 69773 a duplicate of this one; I've also listed other possible duplicates in the comments for 69773). This was difficult to track down, and it'd be good if there was a warning if any interface is hidden because of an iftab entry, and/or udev would warn abo

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-11-01 Thread Daniel Allen
Good point about PCI devices being activated in semi-arbitrary order. That's what makes it necessary to have this database in the first place, I suppose. I would be happy enough if dmesg and/or syslog reported hints when a new MAC address was added to the db, and to report which MAC was assigned t

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-11-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
The reason we can't re-use reserved interface names is because at the point at which we're activating an interface, we don't know whether the interface that reserved the name is going to be activated later or not. It's not just removable devices, ordinary PCI devices can be activated in either ord

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-10-30 Thread Kai Kasurinen
** Changed in: Ubuntu Sourcepackagename: None => udev -- Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error https://launchpad.net/bugs/53936 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-10-16 Thread Jonathan Bell
Ditto for Kubuntu 6.06 when I changed motherboards. Mathworks Matlab activation script uses the MAC address for eth0 to activate its software. Kubuntu had gone ahead and assigned the new card to eth1 so Matlab activation script failed (this is a bug in their activation script as much as it is a Ub

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-10-05 Thread x
We had the same problem with /etc/iftab file when we used one computer to create an image of the hard drive and then copied that to new computer. So I second that this is a real problem and something should be done for it. -- Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error https://launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-08-15 Thread Daniel Allen
I and my colleagues deal with ubuntu images/restores and the current udev/iftab behaviour has caused us a fair bit of grief for the same reason. Currently, a backup or image isn't usable by another machine without manually editing iftab. That isn't obvious to users, I think. One solution is to w