Very strange, now I have reinstalled updates from xorg-edgers again and indeed
found slight improvement of the performance! Maybe thanks to the newer version
of mesa. Synaptic says mesa is 7.8.0 now (was 1.6.0), Intel driver is 2.10.0
(was 2.9.0), xserver-xorg-core is 1.6.5 (was 1.6.4).
However,
Some Extreme Tux Racer tests (intel GMA X3100 (GL360)):
linux version on linux (Karmic): 15-20 FPS
windows version on linux (Karmic) via wine: 15-20 FPS
windows version on windows (Vista) on the same computer: 40-50 FPS
So it looks that linux intel video driver is at least 2-2.5 times more slow
t
@Andres Monroy-Hernandez I tried follwing your tip but I am still
getting same performace no improvement here :(
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
I upgraded Xorg and its drivers using the Xorg edgers PPA and now
performance is good.
http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates/ubuntu
http://ppa.launchpad.net/xorg-edgers/drivers-only/ubuntu
I now have Xorg 1:7.4.3
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https:
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => intel linux graphics (intellinuxgraphics-2008q4)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Ubuntu Forums
Multimedia & Video
HOWTO: Jaunty Intel Graphics Performance Guide
is probably what pfxcore is referring to. See:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582
I don't remember having much luck when I was trying to follow the
suggestions; perhaps you might do better
I'm u
Could you be more specific, which guide do are you referring to, and can
you provide a link to the how to?
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
im on karmic and using gm965 on this guide
what can i say about that
1 - u follow the howto to upgrade jaunty driver
2 - open synaptic package on local/obsolete
3 - force install for all intel driver
4 - make this remain libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-glx libglu1-mesa
libglu1-mesa-dev mesa-common-dev
Indian Art,
Sorry, the problem you have resolved and decribed here(citing Giblet5)
has absolutely nothing related to the bug.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
My problem was solved by following the above instructions given by
Giblet5 from Ubuntu Forums. Thanks Giblet5!
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I had similar problems but then I manually set it right with the following
instructions:
HOWTO: Wrong/Low Resolution and flicker
The Xorg server - the code that provides a graphic display - is very good about
determining what an attached monitor can do. There are limitations.
This HOWTO explains
Some effects are slow randomly and slows the system, i have Intel 945GM.
Note: The best driver for my Intel 945GM was on Ubuntu 8.10.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
I am also experiencing very sluggish performance recently, while it was
quite fast around the 9.10 release.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
After upgrading to Karmic, my display wont come back after it goes to
sleep... If you need further logs - let me know.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
After upgrade X works only in log-graphics mode. I seek and tired of
ubuntu stories with intel graphics.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
I don't know if it's been already pointed out, but Xorg CPU load can
rise as high as 99% (that is my 2 CPUs running top load) when I resize a
window or switch between desktops!!.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You receiv
I switched to 2.6.30, and got a reasonable 1200x720(or whatever)
resolution back!! Compiz compositing can't be enabled, and the overall
performance when drawing windows is still a bit turtlier (I meant slow).
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.
I just upgraded to Karmic, and windows composition was broken, the whole
display became sluggish, with a max resolution of 800x600!
I disabled the UXA line in xorg.conf without effect.
Card:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated
Graphics Controller (rev 02)
X
Running Kubuntu Jaunty 9.04 KDE 4.3.2. My Graphics consist of:
Graphics: Card Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics
Controller X.Org 1.6.0 Res: 1440x...@59.9hz
GLX Renderer Mesa DRI Intel 945GM GEM 20090326 2009Q1 RC2 x86/MMX/SSE2 GLX
Version 1.4 Mesa 7.4
In Kubuntu Kar
Same problem in:
lspci | egrep "VGA"
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because
Another vote for intel drivers not working optimally. Installed netbook-
remix interface but the interface is sluggish to say the least. Moving
windows around is slow and choppy (the larger the windows, the slower
and choppier it is moving it around).
x...@sephiroth:~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridg
Same here:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics
Controller (rev 02)
With compiz:
Compiz benchmwark - circa 18-20fps
Tux racer fullscreen - 5.5fps
glxgears window - 3400 frames in 5 secs
glxgears fullscreen - 240 frames in 5 secs
Without compiz:
Tux race
Same problem here, with latest Karmic:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
Linux li3910 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC
2009 i686 GNU/Linux
Tux racer windowed/fullscreen at 640x480 gets 8fps
I confirm this too:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Confirmed on this as well:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
Performance is "stuttering", windows are blurred for about 0.5s when
opening, glxgears runs smooth for a couple of seconds, then stops and
then continues. Performance
I don't know if its any related to this blog, but graphic performance on
my kubuntu 9.10 just don't cut it. The whole system is so slow and
laddy. Is there anything I can do to improve performance. Maybe
downgrade to the version of xserver which ships with jaunty? :( . am
using the Intel GMi965
--
I can confirm this, too. Running glxgears yelds ~1200 FPS in 5 seconds.
Overall interface seems laggy.
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.
Another vote for this:
LSPCI returns:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
General sloppy
One more vote for this. My lscpi returns:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification bec
After a little testing, it does seem that the culprit (in my case) is
xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.8. I reverted to 2.4 and things were
definitely improved, but there were obvious side-effects to reverting.
Oddly enough, running glxgears reports a better frame rate under 2.8,
but is definitely chop
(ugh.. Sorry for typo in your name, Hewbert!)
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I have noticed the same degrading as you, Hhewbert , but I guess it is
related to changings in kernel's scheduler. Besides less DE responsivity
I catched some other slowdown. Say, MPD player clicks when some JVM
application is eating CPU actively (such building NetBeans from
sources).
--
[i965] [
Seems like performance here has degraded a bit in the past few days as
well. There's been so many updates it's hard to say what the culprit
may be ;) (perhaps the kernel bumps)..
I don't have the i965, but it sounds related:
Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memo
The same like Jacob Peddicord wrote: On the 945GME good performance even with
compiz, booting the .30-kernel. Poor performance with the .31-kernel.
Like Cyan Davies wrote- no compiz with kernel .31.
Is the bug related to bug #442197?
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - ag
After inserting a second monitor, use it and then cut it down quite a
performance and visual effects have also been disabled.
Excuse my English.
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification be
I upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic. I cant set my screen resolution higher
than 800x600 and the PC does not wake up from display sleep. I'm on an
integrated Intel 82945G/GZ display
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received t
Cian, look at '/dev/dri' - have you something there? Probably it is
another problem with workaround to reinstall libdrm2 and libdrm-intel1.
There is a dedicated bug wrt /dev/dri problem (try to search).
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Not sure this is the right bug. There's a few bugs with similar
problems.
I upgraded to Karmic yesterday on a Dell Latitude D410 with a 915GM.
Having significant problems with X.org. Absorbing 100% of CPU a lot of
the time. Seems to be with Mozilla apps - Firefox and Thunderbird. Seems
to be redra
** Tags added: kubuntu
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
glxgears runs smooth now. Seems to genlock at exactly 60 frames per
second.
Linux version 2.6.31-10-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.4.1
(Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu1) ) #35-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 22 17:33:42 UTC 2009
xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu2
libgl1-mesa-dri
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
** Summary changed:
- [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
+ [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
--
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are
42 matches
Mail list logo
