[Expired for partman-base (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]
** Changed in: partman-base (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchp
outdated activity; is it still an problem ?
http://www.iloveubuntu.net/may-9th-2013-sees-end-life-ubuntu-804-hardy-
heron-server-ubuntu-1004-lucid-lynx-desktop-and-ubuntu
** Changed in: partman-base (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because yo
It didn't really make sense to me either but it did work. I had tried
restarting the installation 3 or 4 times before I changed the mount
point. The moment it was not top-level it worked. Maybe it was a
coincidence though. Only the NTFS partition was affected by this
behavior.
This is not same
On Tue, January 27, 2009 12:39, Colin Watson wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to *me* that the mount point would make the
> slightest difference here, so I'm not going to make this change until I
> see some reasoning for it. It sounds like sheer coincidence to me ...
Have you tried to simulate the p
It doesn't make sense to *me* that the mount point would make the
slightest difference here, so I'm not going to make this change until I
see some reasoning for it. It sounds like sheer coincidence to me ...
--
Installer couldn't mount NTFS partitions.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32178
You re
Hello,
I also experience this bug and found a work-around on the ubuntu forums.
If you try to mount it as a "top-level" location, it will not work.
However, mounting under another existing location worked.
For example:
setting mount to "/windows" did not work but setting mount to
"/media/windows
** Tags added: 8.04 hardy installer partman
--
Installer couldn't mount NTFS partitions.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
On Tue, May 6, 2008 17:19, Ramon Rocha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I also experience this bug and found a work-around on the ubuntu forums.
> If you try to mount it as a "top-level" location, it will not work.
> However, mounting under another existing location worked.
>
> For example:
>
> setting mount t
Syslog file pertaining to Tony Yarusso's bug report
** Attachment added: "syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10218584/syslog
--
Installer couldn't mount NTFS partitions.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Files pertaining to Tony Yarusso's bug report
** Attachment added: "partman"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10218581/partman
--
Installer couldn't mount NTFS partitions.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a
Also experienced this bug, with the Alternate CD installer of Ubuntu
7.10. At first I thought maybe the NTFS filesystem was corrupted, so we
did a defrag, clean up temporary files, and force CHKDSK, and retried
the Ubuntu install, but with the same results. After about a dozen
attempts with varie
My problem arose when i reinstalled Grub to support gfxboot. My hard drive is
so shared:
1)ntfs -Windows XP - 70,85GB - sda1
2)vfat - Common data - 17,48 GB - sda2
3) - unallocated -35,34 GB Probably Fedora core new partition
4) Extended including:
Linux Swap - 1,13GB
Ubuntu 6.10 - 61,51GB - s
** Changed in: partman-base (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
Installer couldn't mount NTFS partitions.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
13 matches
Mail list logo
