The same ISO file mounts fine with Nautilus in Ubuntu 10.10.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
I have the problem in Ubuntu 10.04.
I just created an ISO file with Brasero and mounted it with Nautilus and
I see the ;1 appended to file names. Mounting with mount works fine.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Invalid => Unknown
** Changed in: gvfs
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
All right, if it's fixed in Maverick with the remaining cases then it's
fixed. Thanks for clarifying.
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug
Andreas:
That's for taking care of this and being a supportive bug-fixer.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
Andreas, Scott:
It's true, this bug seems to be fixed in up-to-date Maverick. (But still
broken on Lucid.) My other problematic ISOs also work in Maverick. Can
the other complainants confirm or deny that the problem is solved?
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bug
$ bsdtar -tvf example.iso
drwx-- 3 0 02048 jul 27 03:58 .
drwx-- 2 0 02048 jul 27 03:36 Documents
-r 1 0 0 179 apr 30 12:32 Documents/examples.desktop
$ bsdtar -tvf ok-in-gvfs-but-bad-in-file-roller-2.iso
drwx-- 2 0 02048
Reopening due to above comments.
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
As a curiosity not directly related to this bug, I've also enclosed
another problematic ISO image. This image was made using mkisofs and is
displayed correctly by gvfs but incorrectly (with suffixes) in file-
roller. The command I used was:
mkisofs -o f.iso -no-rr dir
This is especally odd, since
Andreas,
Thank you for your informative response. I, too, am feeling more
optimistic about this bug.
I noticed that isoinfo reports that the problematic images were created
with Nero Burning ROM, so I decided to test that tool (version 6.6.0.12;
old, but it's what I have). Using the default setti
Hello John Baptist!
Thanks for injecting some positive energy into this bug report. The previous
comments has been really demotivating for me.
I'd like to help clear up some confusion, which will hopefully help you out in
your quest to find the problem ...
* gvfs (and thus nautilus) uses libarc
Unfortunately, all the broken ISO images that I have that suffer this
problem are fairly large; too large for an attachment.
I'd like to discuss the particular problems that I'm having and make
sure we're all on the same page. I also have a theory what the problem
is. Let's say I have an image f.i
Confirmed. Still broken.
Someone needs to attach a small iso to reproduce this error.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
This STILL hasn't been fixed?
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
unfixed in Lucid LOL
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists
This still happens to me for some, not all, ISOs under Lucid. Both
Archive Mounter and Archive Manager present extraneous semicolon-ones.
Mounting the ISO with the mount command works well. Has anyone else
encountered problems?
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bug
In karmic,it can't mount a iso file with chinese filenames correctly.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
I have set the binary package hint: gvfs - But I am not sure about it
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
I have made a report of this bug... you can follow it in here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/462028
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Strange... I'd say that the ISO is using Joilet extension if it would
not be Karmic... The program clearly drops to plain ISO9660 file table,
but why? I think it's better to start a new bug and follow it upstream.
Your problem is not related to this bug.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'ar
when I open it there is nothing inside
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-2.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34423866/Screenshot-2.png
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
check the screen shot.. I tried to open it with file roller to see what
happened and there you go, at the left side you see the ISO file and on
desktop you can see the file mounted
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-1.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34423855/Screenshot-1.png
--
Iso's don't m
Thanks, I'll try to download the image and investigate this. Does file
roller open it?
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
It is a big one: http://www.mininova.org/tor/2728372
When I was going to open it with FILE MOUNTER after mounted it... it was empty
but after burn it everything was Ok
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notificat
Manzur, is the ISO file opened with File Roller? Can you attach a
sample ISO which isn't mounted properly?
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
I am having a similar problem but it is not about the ;1 in the end of a
file name, it is that some ISO files can not be mounted properly, They
seem to be mounted but when I double click to open them, nothing is
inside...
And it is not a problem with the ISO file, because after I burn it I can
pla
Sorry, I was a bit too fast, this is indeed fixed. Thanks
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Hmm... Can you upload a sample image which is mounted incorrectly?
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a m
I'm still having this issue with karmic rc
libarchive is at version 2.6.2-1 here
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
Everything works fine in Karmic RC. I'm marking the bug as fixed.
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Yep - current Karmic alpha 5 mounts ISOs properly and does not show ;1
at the end of each filename
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
The support for Joliet extension has been added to Libarchive 2.7.0 . It
will propably resolve the problems reported.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Gnome Bug 562673 – gvfsd-archive mounts files with uppercase filename
Resolved by adding Joliet extension support to libarchive.
...
Why is that bug linked to this one?
Is the missing Joliet extension support also causing the addition of ;1 to
filenames?
If not, can we remove the external bug wa
I confirm as well on 9.04, happens with all iso's I have created with
DeVeDe and various other iso's.
Right-click on iso and select 'Open with "Archive Mounter"'.
>From OP: "Also the folders contained in the archive have no contents." -
no idea what this is, folders are fine for me, not even the
The problem is still persistent in version 9.04.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
** Changed in: libarchive (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: New => Invalid
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
the issue is a libarchive one, in any case not a jaunty blocker it
doesn't happen on all iso and the mounter is only a context menu option
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
** Package changed: gvfs (Ubuntu) => libarchive (Ubuntu)
** Ch
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #577647
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577647
** Also affects: gvfs via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577647
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.lau
** Changed in: gvfs
Status: Unknown => New
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
This is a terrible error. I experience this with every iso.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
I am not sure if one of these bug reports should be a duplicate, but here is
another bug report for a different package that is also having this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gmount-iso/+bug/303448
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2999
this thing have place only on some tips of iso, if you make iso with
Brasero this bug should not appear, more important is the direction
where iso is mounted, no program can found it.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received thi
I can confirm this bug and it drove me nuts when I tried copying files
from sysresccd.iso over to my usbstick. I ended up having boot errors
and it took me some time to find this bug to be responsible.
I also cannot understand why this is low priority, but as long as gvfs
is not able to mount ISOs
+1 - Archive Mounter is a liability to the user experience right now. It
would be better to force people to 'mount -o loop ... bla bla' .. or to
install 'cdemu'
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification beca
affects me too.
this really makes archive-mounter useless for me. this bug should be given a
higher level and action must be taken to rectify it before the next release.
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notific
Confirmed. This is rather annoying, especially since GMount-ISO seems
to do it properly.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: nautilus => gvfs
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Archive mounter is working correctly for Zips, Tars, etc however when I
mount an ISO it appears to work but all the filenames in the mounted
archive have ';1' appended to the end.
e.g. 'install.exe' becomes 'install.exe;1'
** Attachment added: "Picture of issue"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19789371/iso%20problem.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19789372/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19789373/ProcMaps.txt
** At
50 matches
Mail list logo
