Strange... I'd say that the ISO is using Joilet extension if it would
not be Karmic... The program clearly drops to plain ISO9660 file table,
but why? I think it's better to start a new bug and follow it upstream.
Your problem is not related to this bug.

-- 
Iso's don't mount correctly through 'archive mounter' 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to