Invalidating.. Since there are two alternative solutions (memmap and
grub options) and it seems like interest upstream is slowing...
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
So, shall we mark this bug as Invalid then, if the feature exists in
GRUB already?
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Hi,
> Can someone with defective memory test this works as described?
I'm one of the GRUB developers. We've tested this feature, in fact I
tested it myself, I've been using it on my laptop for several months
with no problem whatsoever.
> If so, we should update the community documentation:
http
Grub2 has a BadRAM option. It looks like the default /etc/default/grub
file on Debian Squeeze explains it's use, along with the Grub2
documentation: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#badram
Since we now use Grub2, this is probably the correct way to handle and
document this feature.
debain already has a package.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-patch-badram
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Would that be part of SWAP space or something else?
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
Badram has other uses for eliminating issues like memory holes, etc.
I have an Intel 865GLC motherboard. There are lockups if memory around
4077Mb is addressed - even though there's only 2048Mb onboard.
Memtest86+ reports the errors when scanning memory, then freezes solid.
I want to try and tell
I wrote a howto:
http://gquigs.blogspot.com/2009/01/bad-memory-howto.html
It is for all intensive purposes just as easy as using the badRAM patch.
(And I have been running with the memmap options for some time now with
no issues).
I'm thinking about closing this bug, does anyone still have a use
Bumping/looking for comments on this one .
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
Well, no need for automation at the moment. A simple boot option and a
small howto on converting memtest output to that boot option would be
totally sufficient for me right now.
Will this be in Intrepid?
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You re
A very neat idea! I agree this is really useful, especially in cases
such as soldered memory where you can't just "buy new memory" (which is
a pretty ignorant argument to begin with anyway).
>From reading the mailing list article from gQuigs, it sounds like memmap
works fine and is already include
Tom: Unfortunately that posting is it for now...
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
Pivo, that posting is hardly a howto IMHO.
So is there any kerneloption to map bad memory in 2.6.25 or not?
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
They submitted it and then discovered memmap could do some (most?) of what
badram does apparently. The whole thread is an interesting read:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/11/319
Memmap "can" do what badram does, (I think) but I have yet to really get it
working. I would love to see the badram optio
GQuigs, cannot understand what u mean by that. A link to the lkml where
you read whatever u read would be helpful.
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
An interesting thing mentioned in one of the pages is
http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/download.html
Specifically this part :-
BadRAM in mainstream kernels? I have submitted the patch to the kernel
and memory management maintainers on March 2nd, 2008. I am looking
forward to reporting good re
Yea.. I was reading the lkml and apparently the creators of badram hadn't
heard of it either.
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14338567/unnamed
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification
Oh wow!
I must not have looked hard enough(.!!) as all I could find was badram. I was
shocked that nothing like it was packaged or anything. Someone, through a forum
system, somewhere, claimed that badram was my only option in software, and I
believed it.
>And last but not least, if it's worth
If I get it right, there's no need for badram patch unless bad bytes are
spread all over the map. With a bit more manual effort one can use
memmap=exactmap parameter already present in current kernels.
A howto for 2.6.25 kernels:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/msg/d90e920265afafd8
I have a use for this, it's worth a couple of hundred dollars to me.
One day perhaps the boot managers, kernel and memtest will all work
seamlessly together to identify, flag and dishonour bad ram (meaning, by
downloading a metapackage and running memtest86, perhaps you could
automatically flag th
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: New => Triaged
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubun
That would be cool. Subscribing to the request.
--
[needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
22 matches
Mail list logo
