I personally think what we have is good enough. If someone thinks
otherwise, please file a merge request in https://salsa.debian.org/php-
team/php-defaults
** Changed in: php7.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Opinion
** Changed in: php7.3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Opinion
--
You re
The "php" package *does not* install libapache2-mod-php by default, it's
the APT dependency solver that picks the first dependency as the best,
but in fact, f.e. the "php7.3" package dependency can be fulfilled by
any web SAPI: `libapache2-mod-php7.3 | php7.3-fpm | php7.3-cgi`.
The dependencies ar
Sorry to come in late with this, but after consulting with the team the
summary is that this bug is present in Debian too. So it would be best
fixed in Debian, and then Ubuntu will pick it up on the next merge. It
is not an issue worth to maintain a delta for IMHO.
Would you mind filing a bug with
** Also affects: php7.3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: php7.3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: php7.3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:21:08PM -, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Bryce, is this something we could do for eoan's new php 7.3?
Yes, I think so too. Also:
* php7.2 needs some security fixes SRU'd
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.2/+bug/1823386
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ub
Bryce, is this something we could do for eoan's new php 7.3?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834963
Title:
apache dependency should be documented in package description
To manage not
** Changed in: php7.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: php7.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834963
Title:
apach
Moses, that sounds like a straightforward way to address this confusion,
I'll update the bug report to reflect your suggestion of clarifying the
package description.
** Summary changed:
- apache dependency
+ apache dependency should be documented in package description
** Description changed:
That does help. The package description doesn't mention this package is
meant for the most common assumed scenario, nor what that most-common
scenario would be -- good thing I wasn't installing packages unattended.
Took me a few guesses to figure out what I could install so I'd have php
for nginx
Thanks for filing this bug in Ubuntu.
The "php" package is meant to be the easiest way to install php for the
most common scenario, which is using a webserver. If you know you want
to use just the cli, you can install php-cli, for example, which won't
pull in a webserver.
If you want to use it as
10 matches
Mail list logo
