Given the rework of NetworkManager and nm-applet in later releases, the
best I can offer is that this was fixed by no longer displaying a
different signal "bar"; just the icons should be matching appropriately.
I'll close this bug an Fix Released now since there is nothing more I
can offer for thi
And the list with bars (taken with mobile phone, as print screen does
not work now)
** Attachment added: "menu_with_bars.jpg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24046717/menu_with_bars.jpg
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178883
I'm running Intrepid Ibex, with proposed and backports enabled.
The list of the nm-applet shows much lower signal strength (the bar in the list
shows about 20%-25%), but the balloon of the systray shows 52% (it is not
constant). See the attachment.
** Attachment added: "balloon.png"
http://la
Problem is still with the current test Jaunty--unless I run a "pure" N
network--then both read 100%--I guess due to signal strength being so
high that NM can't report less.Looks like the signal strength report
needs to be retested for N networks. If I run a "mixed" network, NM
reports around 70
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178883
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
I am running Intrepid (released version) with all the updates and the
nm-applet shows 14% signal strength and the Network monitor shows
average value of 59% signal strength, which is in good agreement with
the Vista (dual boot) value. Based on the performance I would say that
the network monitor
having the same problem here. oddly enough it only shows in the list of
wireless networks in networkmanager.
once i connect to a network, it shows the signal strength correcty in systray
(but still not in the list)
network monitor obviously reports the correct value (same as in systray)
running
Same here:
Network Manager reads 28%, and Network Monitor shows ath0 at 65%.
Behavior/speed-wise, the 65% number seems more accurate.
OS: Up-to-date Hardy, running an Atheros AR5416 802.11abgn pci card.
Wonder if this behavior is consistent regardless of hardware -- I'm
running a dated Compaq Arm
Just a update--this is still happening in the current testing Ibex--
Network Monitor Applet reports 80% while the current version of nm-
applet reports 51%. Looks like the metrics have not changed.
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
same problem on hardy, T60. Network Monitor Applet displays 85% while
the nm-applet reports 57%.
#lspci -vv
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC
(rev 01)
Subsystem: IBM ThinkPad 11a/b/g Wireless LAN Mini Express Adapter
(AR5BXB6)
Control:
same problem on an hp pavilion dv2708ca
specs are:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c01297719&lc=en&cc=ca&dlc=en&product=3653328&rule=40708&lang=en
except for the wireless card which is a broadcom 4310 (cuz hp doesn't know
their own products...trust me i called them)
- using
I should have added the hardware:
My System: Dell Latitude D620, Video: Intel 945GM, Audio: Intel 82801G,
Wireless: Intel 3945ABG, Ethernet: Broadcom CM5752, Bluetooth: Toshiba
Internal
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178883
I have always noticed a difference between what NM reports and WinXP
reports. Just for the heck of it after seeing this posted in the forum
I started Network Monitor Applet and NM reports 63% where Network
Monitor Applet and WinXP reports over 90%.
This is on current updates of Hardy but it was t
For me it's NM = 26% and Network applet = 65%
All uptodate Hardy and Atheros AR5212 802.11abg.
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178883
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Greetings!! With the updates over the last few days the "gap" has
closed--NM now reads 62% to Network applet reading 82%
Anything else I need to look for?
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi Dean
> could you please include a screenshot showing this issue in action, and also
> the output of iwconfi
Greetings!!
The screenshot is included, but it seems to be unable to include the
balloon from Network Managerat the moment of screen capture the
balloon was reporting 35%. As far as the kernel--is stock issue--no
mods. Output from Iwconfig:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ iwconfig
> lono wirele
Hi Dean
could you please include a screenshot showing this issue in action, and also
the output of iwconfig command, you're using the kernel module shipped with
Ubuntu right?
Thanks
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178883
You
Greetings!! I wanted to report that the difference is still there after
the updates that came thru on the 22/23.
Have a great day!!
Cheers!!
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi Dean
> If its possible for you, the newest one should always being used, since is
> shipped with the latest upgrades and p
Hi Basilio--
Just removed all traces of NM 0.7 & reinstalled NM 0.6.6 in my main
system--fully updated Hardy--reports same as the Beta disc--30%
difference between the two--Is there anything else you need to know that
I haven't reported yet?
Cheers!!
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi Dean
> do yo
Booted beta 8.04---no change in reported strengths--Network Manager
reports 47% & Network Monitor Applet reports 77%Same as NM 0.7 &
associated applet report. Using a D-Link DWL-G520/driver ath0.
Interesting that it stays exactly 30% between the two.
Cheers!!
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi
Sounds good---I've got it downloaded/burned. Will check it tonight &
have answers for you...
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi Dean
> If its possible for you, the newest one should always being used, since is
> shipped with the latest upgrades and patches.
> you can grab the beta from here: http:
Hi Dean
If its possible for you, the newest one should always being used, since is
shipped with the latest upgrades and patches.
you can grab the beta from here: http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/8.04/
Thanks
--
Difference in reported signal strength with network monitor applet
https://bugs.l
Did you want me to use Alpha 6 or wait for the Beta release?
Dean
Basilio Kublik wrote:
> Hi Dean
> do you still experience this issue with the current version of the
> application?, could you please try to reproduce this using the live
> environment of the Desktop CD of the development relea
I'll get that checked within the next couple of days...at work right
now...
Dean
On 3/20/08, Basilio Kublik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dean
> do you still experience this issue with the current version of the
> application?, could you please try to reproduce this using the live
> environm
Hi Dean
do you still experience this issue with the current version of the
application?, could you please try to reproduce this using the live
environment of the Desktop CD of the development release - Hardy Heron.
Thanks in advance
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undeci
25 matches
Mail list logo
