This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
---
libreoffice (1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1) groovy; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1913353)
[ Rico Tzschichholz ]
* Update yaru icon style "2021-01-31"
* Move libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb to Recom
Groovy verified per LP: #1913353.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
** Description changed:
+ [Verification and regression analysis is all handled via the main SRU
+ bug of LP: #1913353]
+
See http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice/cosmic/arm64.
In the past 30 days, 8 out of 45 test runs failed. That a 18% failure
rate. It would be good to un
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:7.1.1~rc2-2ubuntu1
---
libreoffice (1:7.1.1~rc2-2ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Fix autopkgtest failures
-- Rico Tzschichholz Mon, 01 Mar 2021 11:17:32
+0100
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fi
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage notifications about
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:7.0.4~rc2-0ubuntu2
---
libreoffice (1:7.0.4~rc2-0ubuntu2) hirsute; urgency=medium
* Revert "Re-enable coinmp (LP: #1905422)" until MIR is sorted out
-- Rico Tzschichholz Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:05:19
+0100
** Changed in: libreoffice
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:46:52PM -, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
> This issue is not restricted to arm* but have been seen occasionally on amd64.
> It effects the binary package build too, where these tests are part of "make
> check".
>
> There are a lot tests disabled in
> 'sw/qa/uitest/writer
Launchpad has imported 3 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129838.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
http
This issue is not restricted to arm* but have been seen occasionally on amd64.
It effects the binary package build too, where these tests are part of "make
check".
There are a lot tests disabled in
'sw/qa/uitest/writer_dialogs/openDialogs.py' for similar reasons.
So while it locks up at "test_21
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #129838
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129838
** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129838
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notifica
After some more investigation, here are the main points that make this issue a
tricky one to debug:
1. The test failure is not isolated. While the uicheck-sw test is the culprit,
it is just an umbrella for many other tests. And it's those smaller tests that
the failure occurs all over. This make
> That would seem to rule out FTBFS for example too.
We have been rls-not-fixing build failures in the past as well yes,
especially in non lts series
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785
> Would work for me, can we mark flaky-on-armhf only (I'd not be aware)?
The only way I could think to do this would be to duplicate the test and
use "Architecture:" to run the "Restrictions: flaky" one on armhf arm64
only and the other one otherwise.
In this case the failure is a *timeout* thoug
> we don't believe it's a release issue
It would be good to elaborate when making such comments.
It's a drag on the archive in general when we have flaky tests, and even
more so when they take many hours and potentially multiple retries to
succeed.
What's the criteria you're using here? Are we s
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Heather Ellsworth (hellsworth)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage
Tagging notfixing, the bug is assigned and we will try to get it fixed
rather sooner than later but we don't believe it's a release issue
** Tags removed: rls-hh-incoming
** Tags added: rls-hh-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:00 PM Heather Ellsworth
<1785...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> I agree that the uicheck-sw test has increased in flakiness. How about
> instead of removing the test or sinking the resources into actually
> fixing them right now, I can mark them flaky so that at least a fa
I agree that the uicheck-sw test has increased in flakiness. How about
instead of removing the test or sinking the resources into actually
fixing them right now, I can mark them flaky so that at least a failed
test looks like a skipped test:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/blob/master
This recently showed up often enough that I bothered to find this bug :-/
I think it degraded again into a state where we should consider:
IRC:
[13:16] Was there any hope to not expect this to be a retry-monster
forever?
[13:17] The desktop team should be asked if they can work on making
that
Christian raised this with us just now - I think we should consider
taking a look at this.
Looking at
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice/hirsute/arm64
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice/hirsute/armhf
the tests are basically OK but one of the uicheck-* ones ends up
** Tags added: rls-hh-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage notifi
1 failure out of 57 test runs in the past 30 days, that's a 1.75%
failure rate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage notifications abo
3 failures out of 54 test runs in the past 30 days, that's a 5.6%
failure rate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785262
Title:
arm64 autopkgtests are flaky
To manage notifications abo
25 matches
Mail list logo
