[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2018-06-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for Ubuntu on IBM z Systems because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2018-06-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for debian-installer (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2018-02-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Assignee: bugproxy (bugproxy) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694206 Title: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in defaul

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2018-01-30 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694206 Title: op

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2017-07-02 Thread Frank Heimes
We do not really like the idea to install such kinds of additional packages by default, because not everybody is going to really make use of them and they would introduce a certain level of additional risk. A bug in one of the packages would require a resin of the iso and other architectures don

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2017-06-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
This is not the first bug report that mentions "Userspace rpm". Is this a template of some sort? And if yes, can you please adjust to use a different term for Ubuntu, or at least use more generic term? E.g. "Userspace packages"? On Ubuntu, we do not ship nor install "userspace rpm". Instead, we us

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2017-06-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Usually, packages on Ubuntu systems are configured and ready for use (e.g. installing apache2 starts httpd daemon and it serves stock pages on port 80). Installing openssl-ibmca will not enable it by default as further configuration is required. What is the goal here? To have packages more availab

[Bug 1694206] Re: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation

2017-05-29 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694206 Title: openssl-ibmca and libica2 should be in default installation