** Tags added: bugnameltc-136144 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
--- Comment From gowrishanka...@in.ibm.com 2017-02-09 06:25 EDT---
New request for openvswitch-switch-dpdk to be in main archive:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch-dpdk/+bug/1663206
** Tags removed: bugnameltc-136144 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notificat
Please do note that I happened to find that openvswitch rebuilt fine as well
but there ppc is not enabled for DPDK.
See: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/2.6.1-0ubuntu4
There was no bug about that, so no one considered enabling that as well so far.
If you want/need that as well pl
Hi,
I got the issues fixed that prevented it from migrating.
Now fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/16.11-1ubuntu3
ppc build fine
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/16.11-1ubuntu3/+build/11981275
The auto-close in the changelog got lost in the back and forth between
sync an
Let me clarify:
- dpdk is hereby enabled for ppc64el
- dpdk is not yet enabled for openvswitch-switch-dpdk for ppc64el
If you happen to need the second as well, please get in touch asap.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Assigning to paelzer since he has this bug already fix committed.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) => ChristianEhrhardt
(paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Since release is correctly in queue but blocked due to the component
mismatch for now setting back from released to committed to reflect
that.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
What ?
It has the 16M code we discussed a while ago in its init script:
grep 16 debian/dpdk-init
if [ -n "${NR_16M_PAGES}" -a -z "$(get_hugetlbfs_mountpoint '16M')" ]; then
_mount_hugetlbfs 16M
_setup_hugepages "hugepages-16384kB" "$NR_16M_PAGES"
Is there an issue with it?
--
Y
Upload which has it enabled is in the queue, waiting for one more
approval and then a rebuild of openvswitch - but ppc enabled dpdk is
there now https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/16.11-1.
I'll ping you again once it is consumable.
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix
I wanted to let you know, that I've made the latest changes available for you.
The ppa now holds dpdk - 16.07-1~git2 which contains the contributions of your
coworker gshankarmk.
I also pushed a newer version of openvswitch openvswitch -
2.6.0~git20160912.dc61b4e-0ubuntu5~ppa1 including the ppc e
Thank you Pradeep,
Thanks for the clarification about the MLX drivers.
I'm a bit afraid that this will just be another drop on spinning the
"mlx-often-broken-by-being-too-special" wheel instead of once getting them
upstream for real and by that to "just work". But that is a debate outside of
th
Hi,
thanks for your reply - it improved my expectation a bit, but not in all
regards.
I'll slim down the content of the discussion a bit and try to focus on the
important pieces.
> 1. Start with Ubuntu 16.10 Tech Preview and support only Mellanox
adapter (requires MLNX_OFED)
As I explained befo
Hi,
thanks for testing, sad that there could have been no HW test and also that it
was only testpmd.
I think it is time to discuss what we do about your request to have it as "tech
preview only".
To my knowledge there is no such thing as a tech preview per package
(please correct me if I'm wrong
Hello Christian,
Thanks. I will ask Pradeep, who is our DPDK specialist, to test it.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notificati
Hi,
the issue with the xenvirt dep was a weird one. After some analysis I could
track it down to a build artifact from a change to dpdk packaging a few weeks
ago that made it into the uploaded tarballs. That was hard to spot.
I fixed that up and after that also found a few other related creeping
Hi,
I doubt a spec file will help deb packaging, but I can still use that info :-)
You changes look good, I was able to apply and extended them for you.
Some of that as-is would have broken arm or the dep8 tests.
Regarding this change:
Removing "CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_BOND=n" from config/
Could you
Hi,
this is just the "old" patch we had in the past isn't it?
It still refers to 2.0, libdpdk0 and many other things long gone, has no ref to
any current PMD packages and so on.
Also these days you shouldn't need to patch default vars, you have your own.
We set machines and such via d/rules as ne
** Tags added: bugnameltc-136144 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launc
** Tags removed: bugnameltc-136144 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
I consider the ppc build issue a task of IBM to look into, but took the
chance to researched the case of the MLX issues a bit.
I found bugs that would address this, but aren't fixed due to people changing
at mellanox that were supposed to work on this.
To get the MLX drivers working we are blocke
@Mark - thanks for your feedback about the prio.
In fact we have discussed here and on IRC about DPDK for Power for quite a
while.
I wouldn't mind setting any higher priority, but so far the bug was never
blocked on us and wishlist reflected the "somewhen in the future when upstream
ppc is ready
Hi Pradeep and Breno,
since you refer to MLNX_OFED I assume that implies you will need the mlx4/5 pmd
drivers in DPDK.
Those drivers are disabled by default in DPDK which usually implies they are
not considered is not stable to be used. In this case they are disabled due to
external dependencies
Folks, we should not consider this a "wishlist" so much as a "why isn't
this already in Power since we are claiming equivalent support for
features". This also blocks some of our NFV market.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Hi,
it is kind of late for 16.10 I think.
Since I lack HW to test it - as already made aware before in this bug -
this depends to some extend on your commitment to validate and test.
If I enable it in a ppa tomorrow are you willing and able to test that ppa
Tue-Friday to ensure that DPDK and Vswitc
Hello, I have been working internally and we want to enable and support
DPDK on Ubuntu. Is it still possible to enable it to be compiled against
ppc64el?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Hi Christian.
My apologies for not replying to this earlier.
I will try to check how it is on our side and let you know.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1610
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1704
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about t
Hi,
I've seen upstream ppc work recently.
So I wanted to know whats your status on testing/stability and so on?
We are working on dpdk 16.04 currently - is ppc something we
should/could consider now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-16.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: dpdk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc6
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin1604
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin1610
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about t
So all I said on the other bug still applies.
Everbody is invited to use my ppa for testing purpose, but since dpdk is going
to be in main in 16.04 we would need someone to commit seriously on testing and
working on dodk-ppc64el.
For that I need the taco Team and IBM to coordinate if/how it shal
Hello Christian.
This is exactly the same as 1538664 because I created this immediately after
invalidating the other one.
Please consider this as the feature request.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Package changed: ubuntu => dpdk (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539775
Title:
Enable ppc64el on dpdk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.
34 matches
Mail list logo
