** Changed in: xfce4-places-plugin
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
Title:
should allow opening non-removable partitions (port to Gio)
T
Launchpad has imported 19 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6663.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.la
Yup, the patch is not suitable for SRU (also, I didn't include it in
natty because of that, too big and too late). It's fine for a backport
though, feel free to request it.
Indeed, xfce4-places-plugin was dropped from the default install because
it wasn't ported and still using exo-mount at that t
Although it may not be default in 11.04, it was included and part of the
default panel configuration for earlier Xubuntu releases, so anyone
upgrading to 11.04 will be met with the error message.
This is a functionality regression for existing Xubuntu users.
--
You received this bug notification
The plugin isn't in the default installation. This was one of the
reasons it was dropped IIRC.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
Title:
should allow opening non-removable partiti
I would rather call it a bug fix, not a new feature, because exo-mount
is no more present in natty, and thus the user gets an error message. I
don't think that's desired for a default installation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Thank you for recommending the SRU. However, since it's a 1600+ line
patch and a new feature (places accessing volumes through GIO), I don't
think this would be a good candidate for an SRU. However, you can file
a backport request against the natty-backports project. Instructions
for filing this
I recommend this package for SRU, because it (1) has an obviously safe
patch and (2) affects an application rather than critical infrastructure
packages (like X.org or the kernel).
- It impacts all users of xfce4 using the default config, confronting
them with an error message when they try to mou
** Summary changed:
- should allow opening non-removable partitions
+ should allow opening non-removable partitions (port to Gio)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
Title:
should
Yes, otherwises the bug would have been closed (it needs someone to port
it to gio & udev, cf. upstream bug).
** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #6663
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
** Also affects: xfce4-places-plugin via
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
Impor
Is this still an issue with current xfce?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
Title:
should allow opening non-removable partitions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Changed in: xfce4-places-plugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
should allow opening non-removable partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
** Changed in: xfce4-places-plugin (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Wishlist
--
should allow opening non-removable partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
"currently, unlike in thunar and xfdesktop, the volumes that are non-
removable are greyed out. Our thunar is patched to do that, and the
places plugin should behave similarly."
I feel like I entirely missed your request. Please explain.
"high prio, for consistency with the rest of the default d
I have just noticed there's a way to mount by clicking on the small
context menu that appears on greyed out volumes. Is there a disadvantage
to just mounting without showing that menu at all? That is how thunar an
dnautilus behave.
--
should allow opening non-removable partitions
https://bugs.lau
high prio, for consistency with the rest of the default desktop
** Changed in: xfce4-places-plugin (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
should allow opening non-removable partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
16 matches
Mail list logo
