** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
Title:
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
To manage notifications
Installing uswsusp on 12.04 now gets me s2ram. (Which is effectively
deprecated / unmaintained / obsolete now, but hey :). That is, it still
works for existing machines, but new whitelist entries are no longer
being added).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Is this bug now fully fixed for you?
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
Title:
Please re-enable build of s2ram bi
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/uswsusp
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
This bug was fixed in the package uswsusp - 0.8-1.1ubuntu1
---
uswsusp (0.8-1.1ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #241115, #132603), remaining Ubuntu
changes:
- debian/control: modify libsplashy1-dev to libusplash-dev in Build-Depends
field
diehardlinux wrote:
> I must conclude with the others on this issue. I two would find use for
> the command: s2ram. Like others here and abroad I experience a similar
> problems when attempting to go into "suspend mode" my machine shutdown
> instead of suspending, and in the process it does not rec
I must conclude with the others on this issue. I two would find use for
the command: s2ram. Like others here and abroad I experience a similar
problems when attempting to go into "suspend mode" my machine shutdown
instead of suspending, and in the process it does not recover from the
suspend. I hav
+1
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
Please readd s2ram, and provide up to date version of the only one
software that does sleep my computer correctly.
I was waiting interpid to see new version of uswsusp with s2ram!
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:55 +, Jaba wrote:
> I have working suspend with default ubuntu installation. Although hibernate
> is not working.
> It seems that it saves the state to disk and shutdowns the computer, but by
> boot there's
> no mention of resume or anything else that has something t
Jaba wrote:
> I have working suspend with default ubuntu installation. Although hibernate
> is not working.
> It seems that it saves the state to disk and shutdowns the computer, but by
> boot there's
> no mention of resume or anything else that has something to do with suspend.
>
> With uswsus
I have working suspend with default ubuntu installation. Although hibernate is
not working.
It seems that it saves the state to disk and shutdowns the computer, but by
boot there's
no mention of resume or anything else that has something to do with suspend.
With uswsusp I can have working hibe
For those of you who can't suspend with pm-suspend, check out the
workaround in bug #212660, and see if it helps.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/212660/comments/15
In my case, it worked without the chmod command.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launc
Great sluething, Sune! I was almost as far along, having figured out
that pm-is-supported --suspend was failing due to missing s2ram, but
hadn't made the connection that removing uswsusp might make the problem
go away. I can confirm that gnome-power-manager regrows the suspend
option after an "/etc
The following is the case on my IBM ThinkPad X32 running Intrepid Ibex
on September 10th:
I couldn't suspend with pm-suspend but it worked with pm-suspend-hybrid and
pm-hibernate. Also, the suspend option had gone missing from my Gnome Power
Manager menu.
pm-is-supported --suspend failed while -
Ingo, I've got a ASUS M2N mobo as well. but with the uswsusp 0.7-1
package from http://packages.debian.org/sid/uswsusp my machine still
won't return from suspend properly. I just got a black screen, did you
have this issue as well? If so could you send me a e-mail?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to fix
+1 vote. s2ram works for me since Edgy ! I'm on Hardy and pm-utils can't
make my computer suspend 'out of the box'
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Yay, I'm glad to see this confirmed & nominated, if not yet implemented.
I'd just like to add: when "s2ram" was removed, it was left in the
"command-not-found" data. That means if uswsusp is not installed and
you try to run "s2ram", it lies to you - telling you that s2ram can be
found in the usws
+1 vote for re-adding s2ram.
@DaveAbrahams: Ehr, no, I will not add a debian repo to my ubuntu.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
Those looking for s2ram might want to try
http://leoslog.wordpress.com/2008/03/29/putting-the-thinkpad-t60p-to-
sleep-in-ubuntu-hardy-heron-beta/
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Are you sure you don't need s2both? s2both is included in the latest
uswsusp / μswsusp
s2both (like s2disk) is useless for me:
writing my 6GB of ECC-RAM to disk takes by far longer than shutdown and reboot!
For what did I invest in ECC-RAM and a UPS?
Ingo
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram b
Savvas Radević,
I *can NOT* use s2both. ONLY s2ram will work with me. As explained in previous
comments. Hibernating+suspend just does NOT work, whereas suspend does.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you a
Well, that would be nice, too.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Savvas Radević <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ** Description changed:
>
> Please re-enable build of the s2ram-binary, it has some configuration
> options that are missing with the "/etc/acpi/sleep.sh"-way of
> suspending, primarily t
** Description changed:
Please re-enable build of the s2ram-binary, it has some configuration
options that are missing with the "/etc/acpi/sleep.sh"-way of
suspending, primarily the VBE Mode option instead of VBE Save, which is
the only way I've ever been able to resume my laptop from susp
add another vote for putting this back.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Changed in: uswsusp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
> That's why I use free software in the first place.
Absolutely right!
Just silently removing s2ram from uswsusp package without proper documentation
of that modification, may even violate the GPL.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received thi
>Keeping s2ram in the archive just confuses the issue horribly.
Here's a solution -- put the s2ram binary in it's own package. Have both
pm-utils and swsusp dependent on this third package. The pm-suspend script can
execute the s2ram binary rather than introduce more bugs by trying to
re-impleme
It is absolutely crazy:
Meanwhile I have 6GB of good ECC-RAM and do not need a swap anymore!
(with an USV there is no danger of power loss) and s2ram works perfect.
If writing those 6GB to the hard-disk it will take about 2.5 minutes (40MB/s)
and re-reading another 2.5 min.
Alltogether by far lo
I dont use (have) a swap. This feature is vital to me.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
pm-suspend works fine for me with the generic ATI driver. but not wih
fglrx, which is why i wanted to use uswsusp so bad in the first place.
so for me - no help.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Forgot to attach the link to uswsusp 0.7-1:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/uswsusp
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
> Keeping s2ram in the archive just confuses the issue horribly
This way reminds me somewhat on the 'Redmond attitudes':
a) collect information from what is available around and build a own piece of
software out of that.
b) if it works without major complaints try to prohibit other solutions to
To make things definitely clear I sent a mail to the developer which had
removed the build of s2ram from the package uswsusp, asking him a kind
of justification.
Matthew Garrett answered:
We use pm-utils in 8.04, and if things work with s2ram and not that then it's a
bug that should be filed rath
oh, it works for me to!!!
but it's important to first istall gutsy's default uswsusp-0.6 and only than
debian's uswsusp-0.7.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the b
please re-enable build of the s2ram-binary, it was the only working
method to suspend for me on HP NX8220 with feisty.
downgrading to Feisty's uswsusp (or upgrading to debian uswsusp 0.7)
doesn't work for me out of the box. are there any additional steps i
must do?
--
Please re-enable build of s
Confirmed, downgrading to Feisty's uswsusp fixes the problem.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
I see that s2ram is integrated in powersaved
http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/admin/powersaved
" Powersave
s2ram is integrated in the latest version of powersaved, there are some
configuration variables that let you select the workaround if your machine is
not yet in the whitelist. They are expl
even better solution is to just install the original Debian-package on Gusty
which contains version 0.71.
Works perfect here and since my M/B is on the whitelist, I even do not require
the '-f' option any more
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You
Info for you all:
you can force Synaptic to install the 'old' uswsusp 0.3 from Feisty's
universe rpository - then s2ram works perfectly here on Gusty as well!
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
The same from me: please give us back s2ram!
s2ram is the only tool to suspend my PC. The ACPI-functions in GNOME do
not work neither with Gusty nor Feisty.
s2ram works perfectly on my ASUS M2N-E and my motherboard even was put
onto the whitelist for s2ram by the developer. And now with Gusty s2r
I second the argument. As far as I understand, the "it can be done otherwise"
argument holds for the main section, but does not apply to universe. Feel free
to correct me if I'm wrong.
I'd also like s2ram to be re-enabled.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I must agree with the others: re-enable the build of s2ram. First of
all, there is no reason NOT to build it. If the only reason is "You
don't need s2ram, there are other ways to do it", why do you offer
uswsusp at all? There are also other ways to hibernate the system.
The next thing is, that if
> Seems like a rather abrasive solution. Take away a working, packaged
> solution that works, and ask users to fix another solution that
> doesn't work.
Besides, pmi explicitely *has* support for powersaved, which in turn does work
best with uswsusp. Why acpi-support doesn't use s2ram by default,
On 9/13/07, Whoopie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, could you try improving Ubuntu's way of suspend-to-ram instead of
> using s2ram? Just a question, no offence.
>
Seems like a rather abrasive solution. Take away a working, packaged
solution that works, and ask users to fix another solution that
I actually did post working acpi-support files for the hardware I have on the
wiki. There are some corner cases that seem to be handled better by s2ram,
though. And Ubuntu infrastructure can't do s2both for all I know.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13
Hi, could you try improving Ubuntu's way of suspend-to-ram instead of
using s2ram? Just a question, no offence.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
** Changed in: uswsusp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
My Satellite 6100 pro suspends real nice with s2disk... the normal
sleep.sh method fails. Btw. it works just one time and then it fails and
let the laptop crash while it is shutting down.
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notifi
I'm in the same boat. s2ram works with '-f -p'. Why remove this?
Also, pm-utils looks for s2ram/s2disk in /usr/sbin, but its in /sbin
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Tags added: packaging
--
Please re-enable build of s2ram binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
51 matches
Mail list logo
