> Keeping s2ram in the archive just confuses the issue horribly This way reminds me somewhat on the 'Redmond attitudes':
a) collect information from what is available around and build a own piece of software out of that. b) if it works without major complaints try to prohibit other solutions to be used. c) do not disclose details of the proprietary solution. To proove type 'man s2ram' and type 'man pm-suspend' Currently with Ubuntu we still do have a solution: use Debian's uswsusp But this is probably the way to fix Bug#1 ? -- Please re-enable build of s2ram binary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
