The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be
fixed for that release
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Thanks, Felix.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module F
> If someone with the appropriate permissions can set this back to
Confirmed in Precise, that would be appreciated.
Done.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Since I don’t have the ability to unmark this as fixed in Precise (which
it is not), as opposed to Precise Backports (which it is), I’m reopening
it in Ubuntu. Users are still running into this problem because most
users do not have backports enabled. For example, bug 1325352 was just
filed today.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.
This is fixed in precise-backports, not precise. Can you please unmark
this as fixed in precise, if nothing else so that affected users can
find this report?
** Also affects: precise-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: precise-backports
Status: New => Fix R
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS o
Sorry, the correct LP number is LP #1324288.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifications about
Backport accepted on -backports (LP #1274324).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifications abo
Micheal,
I have fulfilled the -backports request as guidelines request on public
bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1324288
Awaiting for ubuntu-backporters to respond.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
I was able to install the openafs 1.6.7-1~precise1 packages from the
provided PPA and they installed and built modules via DKMS with the HWE
linux-generic-lts-saucy kernel on a 12.04 system.
Currently we can use these packages in a separate repo we add to systems
during install time and doing apt-
: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS
on 3.8.0
After this discussion (and some other customers/users requests on the
same bug), knowing that the 1.6.5 backport was not eligible for a SRU
(just like Steve pointed out) I started to cherry-pick code from openafs
1.6.5 to openafs 1.6.1, so
openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1_source.changes
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1_source.changes"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4121053/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1%7Eprecise1_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Of course Anders. You're absolutely right, my fault.
I've updated package version and fixed ppa repository.
I'm also attaching new package source.
Thanks!
PS: Functional tests still needed.
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs
openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.debian.tar.xz
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1~precise1.debian.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4121051/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1%7Eprecise1.debian.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: modul
** Attachment removed: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4120568/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc
** Attachment removed: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206
(Er, I meant ~ubuntu10.04.1, of course.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifications about thi
The version number is too high. Packages in -backports need to have a
smaller version number than the releases they were backported from;
otherwise release upgrades will not work as expected. Usually this is
accomplished with a decreasing ‘~’, as in 1.6.7-1~precise1 or
1.6.7-1~ubuntu8.04.1.
--
Yo
Thank you very much Rafael. I'll test the packages from the PPA today on
our HWE installs and provide any feedback we may have.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-m
openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4120569/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
IMHO backporting OpenAFS from trusty to precise (-backports) would be
the best in this case and probably meet with customers/users
requirement/expectation (just like Micheal pointed out).
With that in mind,
I have backported openafs, from trusty (1.6.7-1) to precise
(1.6.7-1ubuntu1), and made ava
openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1_source.changes
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1_source.changes"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4120570/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc
** Attachment added: "openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/4120568/+files/openafs_1.6.7-1ubuntu1.dsc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
After this discussion (and some other customers/users requests on the
same bug), knowing that the 1.6.5 backport was not eligible for a SRU
(just like Steve pointed out) I started to cherry-pick code from openafs
1.6.5 to openafs 1.6.1, so the openafs dkms module was able to compile
on HWE kernels.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
--
You received this bu
Is it possible to get the OpenAFS 1.6.5 packages into precise-backports
while not replacing the original 1.6.1 packages? I thought the backports
repository was build for situations like this where newer versions can
be installed on older LTS releases.
--
You received this bug notification because
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:04:52AM -, Jonathan Reed wrote:
> Not to get too off topic (and I tried to bring this up in UDS chats when
> rolling releases/HWE became a thing), but that really only works in
> homogenous environments, which are not really a thing in academia or
> other large non-en
On Dec 2, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Only if you use the new point release media, or
> explicitly opt in to the new enablement stack, do you get the newer kernels.
>
> [...]
>
> If you have newer hardware that requires the newer enablement stack, it's
> better to have it available
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:31:26PM -, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I will say that this is the serious problem with accepting new kernels
> into a stable release. If you accept a new kernel version but don't
> accept new upstream releases of all the separately-packaged kernel
> modules, you basically
Steve Langasek writes:
> I don't think we would want to accept a wholesale update, even with
> added userspace test cases. The previous SRU upload was based on a
> package *not* intended for a stable release update; it includes many
> changes that are clearly appropriate to make in a development
> You could pull up only the necessary changes for Linux kernel portability,
> I think there were quite a few, but that's probably still easier than the
> solution that Steve recommended.
Indeed, that would be our first choice from an SRU POV. I was just offering
the "upgrade only the kernel bits
Jonathan Reed writes:
> Running a 1.6.5 module against a 1.6.1 userspace seems like a worse idea
> than taking 1.6.5 as an SRU.
It *should* be harmless, but I think it's also safe to say that it's not
something anyone's likely intentionally testing.
You could pull up only the necessary changes
Running a 1.6.5 module against a 1.6.1 userspace seems like a worse idea
than taking 1.6.5 as an SRU. Would you accept the backport if we
provided additional userland test cases?
I'm not interested in starting a debate about the HWE process, but from
our perspective, the HWE stack broke a package
I don't think we can accept this backport as an enablement SRU. The
openafs package doesn't just include a kernel module, it also includes
all the related userspace components (as you know), including libraries
and pam modules, for which you've included no test case; and there are
extensive packag
I have validated the package pending acceptance in proposed
(1.6.5.1-1~ubuntu0.12.04.1) builds and functions as an OpenAFS client on
all four supported kernels in Precise. That is, 3.2.x, 3.5.x, 3.8.x,
3.11.x.
This was on a system with Debathena packages that installed MIT's
OpenAFS and Kerberos c
I've uploaded 1.6.5.1-1ubuntu0.12.04.1 and it is currently sitting in
the queue for precise-proposed
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Luke Faraone (lfaraone) => (unassigned)
--
You received thi
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Patch added: "openafs_1.6.5-1ubuntu0.12.04.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+attachment/3870917/+files/openafs_1.6.5-1ubuntu0.12.04.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Updated backport for saucy’s 1.6.5-1ubuntu3, which adds one patch for
kernel 3.11 support (bug 1222376), so we won’t have to go through this
yet again for the 12.04.4 cycle. No changes to the backport diff itself,
just the debian/changelog context.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Description changed:
- Looks like we need to patch for 3.8.0 changes again in the LTS…
+ [Impact]
+ Since the backported Raring kernel 3.8 was released into Precise and is
installed by default, OpenAFS cannot be installed on Precise. The out-of-tree
OpenAFS kernel module needs to be upgraded
I endorse the backporting of 1.6.5 as an SRU. This version of AFS has
been widely tested and deployed, and looking over the changelog there do
not appear to be material changes that would cause compatibility issues.
No packages depend on OpenAFS libraries, and the semantics for
interacting with AF
Open a bug task for precise.
** Also affects: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
The attachment "openafs_1.6.5-1ubuntu0.12.04.1.debdiff" seems to be a
debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report
so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the
attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the
https://launchpad.net/~openafs/+archive/stable has the current version
for all supported Ubuntu releases.
But yeah, I think the only real solution is to get OpenAFS 1.6.5 into
precise universe. This is a patch for backporting the current OpenAFS
package to precise.
** Patch added: "openafs_1.6.
I just installed Raring HWE thus updating to the 3.8 kernel. Now I am
also affected by this incompatibilty. Is it possible to get OpenAFS
1.6.5 in the standard repo? Or is there a recomended third party repo
for OpenAFS?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
op
Hmm. We’re going to need to cherry-pick _a lot_ of patches to backport
kernel 3.8 support to OpenAFS 1.6.1. I count at least 22 (on top of the
ones we already took for kernel 3.5):
5842f85 afsd: include sys/resource.h in afsd_kernel.c
54db9af Linux: bypass: consolidate copy_page macros into a si
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387
Title:
openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0
To manage notifications about this b
50 matches
Mail list logo
