Running a 1.6.5 module against a 1.6.1 userspace seems like a worse idea than taking 1.6.5 as an SRU. Would you accept the backport if we provided additional userland test cases?
I'm not interested in starting a debate about the HWE process, but from our perspective, the HWE stack broke a package in universe (albeit one with a small userbase compared to, say, Xorg). From our perspective, any working package is better than a broken package. Because of AFS' small userbase, this SRU should also have far less of an impact than one for, say, Xorg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206387 Title: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1206387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
