[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007371
T
Dvorak David, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an
issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest server
release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from
http://releases.ubuntu.com/raring/ .
If it r
To switch - servers ("A" and "B") are connected to same switch and
configuration of ports is the same (and server "A" works fine).
To failover test - this weekend I tested failover again. Now when unplug two
ports. (In the previous test I unplug only one port). Result is this :
- when unplug two
Hi,
You say that server B has 3 interfaces in the bond; have you tried dropping
down to 2 ports?
Also, is there any diagnostics from the cisco as to what mode it thinks the set
of ports is in? Does it show anything different between server A and B ?
Dave
--
You received this bug notificatio
To Brad Figg #6 => I did run "apport-collect 1007371" and logged in
launchpad. I believe that the log has been sent.
To Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) #7 => I installed this kernel :
$ uname -a
Linux artur 3.5.0-030500rc2-generic #201206082235 SMP Sat Jun 9 02:36:22 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 G
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer
to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
v3.5kernel[0] (Not a kernel in the daily directory) and install both the
linux-image and linux-image-extra .deb packages.
Once you've tested the upstream
In regards to your saying this is a critical bug, I'll say this:
Lets all refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance for bug importance
criterion. "Critical" is not a valid importance for this bug.
Thanks to Dave Gilbert for setting this against "linux" i couldn't do
that yesterday because
I'm sure that's bug, but I do not know if in kernel or bonding driver. Next - I
think, that is it critical bug. For corporate sector is bonding on server (I
think) very important and without link aggregation is that server in large
network unusable. For example, our network has about 100 PCs (~8
If it is a bug it's probably a kernel one (not sure what wrote that
bonding config ?)
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007371
Title:
Preci
Hello, and thanks for filing a bug.
We're having a little bit of difficulty telling what you're trying to
do, are you asking for support or filing an actual bug? In the current
state it's a little bit ambiguous.
We're going to set this as "Incomplete" until we hear back from you, as
in its curre
10 matches
Mail list logo
