[Bug 2098961] Re: Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17 (Xubuntu) on Proxmox 8.3 (bnxt_en + VirtIO)

Is not working: sysadmin@hostname:~$ wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.belwue.net/10G /dev/null 0%[ ] 261,30K 102KB/s ^C sysadmin@hostname:~$ uname -ar Linux hostname 6.8.0-53-generic #54 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Feb 22 02:20:44 UTC 2025 x

[Bug 2098961] Re: Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17 (Xubuntu) on Proxmox 8.3 (bnxt_en + VirtIO)

Hi, uname -r 6.6.30-060630-generic 6.5.0-060500-generic 6.7.0-060700-generic no changes. E1000 slow virtio okay -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961 Title: Severe network perform

[Bug 2098961] Re: Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17 (Xubuntu) on Proxmox 8.3 (bnxt_en + VirtIO)

Hi Tim, I also tested the provided test kernel and the issue was completely resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098961 Title: Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.

[Bug 2098961] [NEW] Severe network performance issues with Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17 (Xubuntu) on Proxmox 8.3 (bnxt_en + VirtIO)

Public bug reported: Since upgrading to Kernel 6.8.0-53 and 6.11.0-17 on Xubuntu 22.04/24.04 VMs, we are experiencing extremely low network speeds (100-200 KB/s) when running these VMs in a Proxmox 8.3.4 cluster with AMD CPUs and Broadcom NetXtreme-E network adapters (bnxt_en driver). With Ke

[Bug 2019968] Re: Add missing feature bits in EPYC-Milan model

Hi Christian and Lukas, For qemu, I can confirm that the patch works as expected: # qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu ? | grep Milan x86 EPYC-Milan(alias configured by machine type) x86 EPYC-Milan-v1 AMD EPYC-Milan Processor x86 EPYC-Milan-v2 AMD EPYC-Milan-v2 Processor Since t

[Bug 2019968] Re: Add missing feature bits in EPYC-Milan model

Thank you for looking into this. If you are planning to do a SRU for this and the missing Genoa model , please consider the whole patch series: https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg01202.html Since you have applied the patch with the updated cache info, you can also cherry pi

[Bug 2097163] [NEW] release Upgrade von Kubuntu 22.04.05 LTS -> 24.04.1 LTS bricht ab ohne eine Fehlermeldung

Public bug reported: Es gibt keine zurückgehaltenen Pakete und ich habe sudo apt clean sudo apt update sudo apt upgrade sudo apt dist-upgrade sudo reboot sudo apt autoremove --purge vorher durchgeführt In den log Dateien finde ich nur einen Hinweis auf zurückgehaltene Pakete, es wird aber bei s

[Bug 2074003] Re: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket

Hello everyone, Packages tested: autofs_5.1.9-1ubuntu4.1 autofs-ldap_5.1.9-1ubuntu4.1 both from noble-proposed. Our auto mount maps are stored in an LDAP server using Kerberos authentification. Without the proposed patch, the auto mounter does not renew its initial Kerberos ticket. Hence it loo

[Bug 2074003] Re: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket

The auto mounter is now running for one week straight without any issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074003 Title: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket To manage notifications

[Bug 2074003] Re: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket

The auto mounter from your PPA is now running for 38 hours in our setup and it keeps renewing its Kerberos tickets as it should. So the new package looks good to me. Thanks again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 2074003] Re: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket

Thanks Andreas! Of course I will test your fix in our setup. In fact, two days ago, I compiled 5.1.9-1.1 from sources and it works nicely in noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207400

[Bug 2074003] Re: autofs fails to renew Kerberos ticket

We are still experiencing the problem of autofs being unable to renew its Kerberos tickets under noble. Maybe 5.1.9-1.1 can be back ported to noble as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2029876] Re: NetPlan Does Not Support WPA3 Enterprise

In Ubuntu 24.04 I can set -- key-management="eap-sha256" -- in my netplan config file for my specific network. But I did not find an option to set -- ieee80211w=2 -- which is also an requirement for WPA3 enterprise network. In wpa_supplicant I can setup the connection, in netplan not. -- You rece

[Bug 2067897] Re: strongswan fails to configure DNS via systemd-resolved (resolvconf: Failed to set DNS configuration: Link lo is loopback device)

Thank you :) and sorry if I hurt your feelings (partially true, partially ironical) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067897 Title: strongswan fails to configure DNS via systemd-resolv

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

Nick Rosbrook, status: Confirmed → Opinion is this your way of getting rid of a serious issue ? if so, wow I am impressed how ignorant one can be.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 2084206] Re: [SRu] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel

Installed packages from Proposed: dolphin 4:24.08.1-0ubuntu1.1 dolphin-data 4:24.08.1-0ubuntu1.1 dolphin-doc 4:24.08.1-0ubuntu1.1 libdolphinvcs6 4:24.08.1-0ubuntu1.1 Successful tests: = 1) Verify information panel can be enabled and disabled by pre

[Bug 2084206] Re: [SRu] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel

Installed the updated package and can confirm the info panel is back. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084206 Title: [SRu] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel To ma

[Bug 2084206] Re: [SRu] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel

Thanks for the quick turnaround on this bug! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084206 Title: [SRu] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2084206] [NEW] Dolphin 24.08.1 has lost its Information Panel

Public bug reported: STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Hamburger Menu > Show Panels OBSERVED RESULT - The Information Panel (which was previously shown in my Dolphin instance) is not shown anymore. - There is no Information entry in the Show Panels submenu. - There is no Information entry in the Keyboard

[Bug 2078589] Re: fight: desktop-base vs kubuntu-settings-desktop vs fontconfig-common:

Thank you, Danny for your suggestion which worked pretty well for me. I successfully upgraded to 24.04.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078589 Title: fight: de

[Bug 2078589] Re: fight: desktop-base vs kubuntu-settings-desktop vs fontconfig-common:

Is it really the only solution to leave Kubuntu? Are there no helpful partial instructions or advice to solve the problem myself? Is there anything I should uninstall instead of reinstalling the machine? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2078589] Re: fight: desktop-base vs kubuntu-settings-desktop vs fontconfig-common:

Any news on this issue? (my duplicate is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2081956) How to savely upgrade from Kubuntu 22.4.1 to 24.4.1? It still does not work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 2081956] Re: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

ppa-purge didn't change anything ... Help needed, please! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081956 Title: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1) To manage notifications a

[Bug 2081956] Re: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

It still does not work. Any suggestions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081956 Title: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1) To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 2081956] Re: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

Could somebody please advise? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081956 Title: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://

[Bug 2082246] [NEW] Using CMake config file fails because of missing HIP package

CMake config file: https://github.com/ROCm/rocALUTION/commit/a7cdd397f1a293fe8fab2082e6e6aa13ac4af640 Would it be possible to cherry-pick that change for the package that is distributed by Ubuntu? Thank you. Markus ** Affects: rocalution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Descrip

[Bug 2081956] Re: do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

There are no "pending" packages: 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. How to solve? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081956 Title: do-release-up

[Bug 2081956] [NEW] do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

Public bug reported: Upgrade still does not work ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-122.132-generic 5.15.163 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-122-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVers

[Bug 2081844] [NEW] do-release-upgrade does not work (22.4.5 -> 24.4.1)

Public bug reported: Updating from Kubuntu 22.4.5 to 24.4.1 via do-release-upgrade does not work do to dangling packages: The following packages have been held back: ubuntu-minimal ubuntu- standard How to solve? Thank you for your support ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: u

[Bug 2081776] [NEW] Syntax warning during install

Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS Release:24.04 Codename: noble gedit (46.2-2) wird eingerichtet ... /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gedit/plugins/externaltools/library.py:212: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\-' RE_KEY = re.compile('^([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-

[Bug 2081641] [NEW] Error during upgrade that asked me to report it

Public bug reported: Install is on a MacBookPro late 2012 running Catalina host OS using Virtualbox 6.1.44 to host Ubuntu Studio. Upgrade was from 22.04.4 to 24.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.19 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-105

[Bug 1972762] Re: Firefox and Chromium snaps preventing apps and devices from working correctly.

@don Johnson: > Why do we even need snap? We do not. I'm off to Debian. Just too fed up with Snap being forced onto me while it is unusable by design. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19

[Bug 2073940] Re: Micro version mismatch between libgtk2.0-0 and libgtk2.0-dev (2.24.33-2ubuntu2)

ug". With best regards, Markus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073940 Title: Micro version mismatch between libgtk2.0-0 and libgtk2.0-dev (2.24.33-2ubuntu2) To manage notificatio

[Bug 2078460] [NEW] Mouse cursor distorted in screen captures

Public bug reported: Under both vanilla Ubuntu 22.04.x and 24.04.1 running Wayland with native GNOME session, the mouse cursor is captured in a distorted way when capturing the screen with some applications, for example with OBS or when screen sharing under Firefox. This happens both, when sharing

[Bug 2078460] Re: Mouse cursor distorted in screen captures

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of distorted cursor" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/2078460/+attachment/5811006/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-08-30%2014-47-58.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2023424] Re: GCC 13 on Lunar exhibits AddressSanitizer/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer bug that doesn't manifest elsewhere

I've managed to run into this as well. Here's a C++ version that runs into the same problem when compiled with `g++ -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=undefined`: struct Hash { alignas(64) unsigned long acc[8]{0}; unsigned int s1 {0}; }; struct B { unsigned int hash() const { retur

[Bug 2059738] Re: Kernel 6.8 - Shutdown/Reboot hangs on Noble 24.04

The shutdown/suspend problem stopped for the after disabling the TTL chip in the security tab in the BIOS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059738 Title: Kernel 6.8 - Shutdown/Reboot ha

[Bug 2059738] Re: Kernel 6.8 - Shutdown/Reboot hangs on Noble 24.04

Today I tried disabling the bluetooth in the BIOS, without success. I also tried the Mainline Kernel 6.10 and LTS Kernel 6.6.47, also without success. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059

[Bug 2059738] Re: Kernel 6.8 - Shutdown/Reboot hangs on Noble 24.04

It happens with my ThinkPad T460 as well. It apperars to be a problem in 6.8 Kernel, as described in this workaround: https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues/3269#issuecomment-2282823931 The problem do not manifest in Fedora 40 with Kernel 6.10 or in Ubuntu 23.10 with older Kernel. ** Bug watch add

[Bug 2076980] [NEW] Unable to specify limits in rush.rc file

Public bug reported: Since Rush 2.3 (Ubuntu 24.04) it is not possible to specify limits in the rush.rc file. Rush fails when parsing the limits string with an 'unknown limit' error. Example: limits t10r20 Result: /etc/rush.rc:19: unknown limit: 10r20 ** Affects: rush (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 2074352] Re: Password to uncrypt system sometimes not accepted on boot

Can confirm. Same behavior on Linux Mint 22 with kernel 6.8.0-40-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074352 Title: Password to uncrypt system sometimes not accepted on boot To ma

[Bug 2028282] Re: SSH pubkey authetication fails when GSSAPI enabled

It appears to be solved in 24.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028282 Title: SSH pubkey authetication fails when GSSAPI enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 2073940] [NEW] Micro version mismatch between libgtk2.0-0 and libgtk2.0-dev (2.24.33-2ubuntu2)

: Installed: 2.24.33-2ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.24.33-2ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.24.33-2ubuntu2 500 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status With best regards, Markus ** Affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

Hello, I acutally run a shell script /root/foo.sh which runs several commands. Maybe that is a difference. And I only use FTPS to connect. Regards, Markus Am 12.07.24 um 09:33 schrieb Christian Ehrhardt : > Hi, > first of all thanks for all the prep work. > The patch LGTM and I

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

. Regards, Markus Am 10.07.24 um 06:10 schrieb Mitchell Dzurick: > Thank you for your time in attempting to install the package Markus. > > I agree with Paride in > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/2069324/comments/8, > we should go ahead and implement this f

[Bug 2066983] Re: Bug in /etc/update-motd.d/50-landscape-sysinfo script - incorrect variable used for load threshold calculation

Hi Timo, thank you very much and also thank you Spencer for fixing the bug! I have tested the proposed package on Ubuntu Noble, Jammy & Focal using the `stress` tool to simulate high load and can confirm that the bug is fixed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verif

[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Files on local network shares are not opened / written

Re #103 Just tested the new package from proposed together with Firefox 127.0.2. Things appear to work just as expected now and I can no longer reproduce the issue. Haven't found any side-effects in other places either so far. Looks like this is now finally fixed in 22.04 with only a few weeks l

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

Sorry, I have no oracular to install the package. Only debian bookworm where it is not installable due to missing dependencies. I only uses the ubuntu sources to build my own patched version for debian. Am 03.07.24 um 06:14 schrieb Bryce Harrington: > Hi Markus - looks like Mitchell's P

[Bug 1975528] Re: [SRU] Crash on window close -- Stable Release Update possible?

Hi, thank you for working on this. Unfortunately, I am not so familiar with this site, where do I see your patches? I will update the bug description as soon as I have time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

When it is needed I can try to install it on my server. Am 21.06.24 um 07:33 schrieb Mitchell Dzurick: > Markus, if we prepare a package with the patch, would you be willing to > help out testing the patch? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

First of all, thank you. I use ansible (to deploy many machines) so a simple copy of 2 files fixes the problem in another manner. I hardcode "eth0" in /etc/strongswan.d/charon/resolv.conf as my default device (iface=eth0). Then I also hardcode the DNS server in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf (DNS=myD

[Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #952421 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952421 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324 Title: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

Well, there is a bug report from 2020 about the problem: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952421 Am 18.06.24 um 21:01 schrieb Mitchell Dzurick: > Markus, would you mind making a bug report upstream to see if this could > be included? > -- You received this bug not

Re: [Bug 2069324] Re: vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

ebug quiet /root/my_script.sh And simply run "logger test" inside. Without the patch the vsftpd hangs as soon as someone logs in. Kind Regards, Markus Am 15.06.24 um 02:50 schrieb Mitchell Dzurick: > Markus, if I were to create a PPA with this patch applied, would you be > wil

[Bug 2069324] [NEW] vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used

Public bug reported: When you try to run a script with pam_exec.so on login vsftpd freezes with SIGCHLD. This was fixed in 2015 by redhat and never adopted to Debian/Ubunutu. See also: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198259 - https://git.centos.org/rpms/vsftpd/blob/54ac5fac29fcc1

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

then there is another problem in comparison to ubuntu 22.04, right now if you install all needed packages for strongswan (I do this via ansible so this issue came to the surface): "strongswan strongswan-charon charon-systemd libstrongswan-extra-plugins libcharon-extra-plugins strongswan-pki" the

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

ok, I confirm all this, on my 24.04 systemd-networkd.service has also the status inactive. "systemctl status systemd-networkd.service" reports: systemd-networkd.service - Network Configuration Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service; disabled; preset: enabled) Act

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

@john, where is this dns.conf located at ? "locate dns.conf" does not find the file on my system. I would like to test your hack as a temporary solution for my VPN server issue (without my DNS servers the connection is useless) thanks for clarification -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

** Description changed: # lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Release: 24.04 # dpkg --status systemd Package: systemd Status: install ok installed Priority: important Section: admin Installed-Size: 11728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Deve

[Bug 2067897] [NEW] Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

Public bug reported: # lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Release:24.04 # dpkg --status systemd Package: systemd Status: install ok installed Priority: important Section: admin Installed-Size: 11728 Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers Architecture: a

[Bug 2066983] [NEW] Bug in /etc/update-motd.d/50-landscape-sysinfo script - incorrect variable used for load threshold calculation

Public bug reported: There is a bug in the /etc/update-motd.d/50-landscape-sysinfo (Symlink to /usr/share/landscape/landscape-sysinfo.wrapper) script in Ubuntu. The script incorrectly sets the load threshold due to a typo, causing the system information to be disabled unnecessarily when the system

[Bug 1772451]

Still repro on: Version: 7.6.6.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 60(Build:3) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: fi-FI Ubuntu package version: 4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 Calc: threaded -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1774244]

Still repro on: Version: 7.6.6.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 60(Build:3) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: fi-FI Ubuntu package version: 4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 Calc: threaded -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1793126]

Still repro on: Version: 7.6.6.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 60(Build:3) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: fi-FI Ubuntu package version: 4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 Calc: threaded -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 1775517] Re: Inputlirc systemd file incorrect syntax

I think we should remove the dependency to lircd.service completely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775517 Title: Inputlirc systemd file incorrect syntax To manage notifications abo

[Bug 2058821] Re: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04

all python3.11 packages are missing now. I wonder: will 24.04 ship with python3.11 or not? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058821 Title: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04 To manage

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

Yeah, but the default is crun. I could have modified the config file of course. But I have not: ...snip # podman run --systemd always -d cruntest 231947c35e1d58cfb3d1ca37e52b6324288af515e3ce6c25a0873a721a213f1b # podman run --systemd always --runtime crun -d cruntest e655a24b5c11d7bd572942533db4b9

[Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

CIA is not happy this got discovered. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059417 Title: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 2058821] Re: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04

yes. package back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058821 Title: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

I also tried the package in some CI runs on github. Looks Good. I changed verification-needed-jammy to verification-done-jammy, however, I would appreciate if another one affected can confirm that it works for him too. Don't know about tag verification-needed, so I did not touch it. -- You rece

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime e

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

I installed the package ...snip # dpkg -l crun Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionArchitecture Description +++-

[Bug 2058821] Re: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04

It disappeared some time after March 16, if I read my CI logs correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058821 Title: python3.11-venv is missing on 24.04 To manage notifications abo

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

Hi Faustin, #12 This bug is a little bit about which image to use, because not every image is triggering this bug. First, systemd must be present in the image. Second, some images are known to not trigger it, e.g. Debian older than 12, Fedora, Rocky, the whole RedHat world does not show the behavi

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

for the record, the crun from https://launchpad.net/~juliank/+archive/ubuntu/podman/+packages passes my reproducer Setting up crun (0.17+dfsg-1.1ubuntu0.1) ... ...snip $ podman run --systemd always -d cruntest 792cc9c24c9c1e936686e63c26befdb67b7e45dd8f9e70c608d164fb49fff7a4 snap... no error mess

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

to reproduce create a systemd image ...snip $ cat - >Containerfile

[Bug 1970074] Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-9H675w/linux-5.15.0/drivers/ata/libahci.c:968:41

From analysis of our setup at work, it should be the JMicron SATA Controller. It works with kernel 5.8 (Ubuntu 20.04) and fails with kernel 5.15 (Ubuntu 22.04). No other kernel versions tested yet. We already contacted our manufacturer (Icy Dock), but no feedback yet. -- You received this bug n

[Bug 1939910] Re: vital entities missing

I have the same issue with Vivado unisim and ghdl-gcc on Ubuntu22.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939910 Title: vital entities missing To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 1975528] [NEW] Crash on window close -- Stable Release Update possible?

Public bug reported: Hi everyone, there is a bug in vtk9, see here for details: https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/18372 In short, the program crashes under certain circumstances when the window is closed. The problem is fixed upstream, affected VTK versions are 9.0.2, 9.0.3, and 9.1.0

[Bug 1964851] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 (dev-branch) shutdown/reboot hangs

I have the same issue on the following system: OS: Ubuntu 22.04 (updated from Ubuntu 21 on May 20th 2022) Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-30-generic, Linux 5.15.0-30-lowlatency Hardware: Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga 460 (20EM), Intel Core i7-6500U Both poweroff and switching Ubuntu into standby lead into a

[Bug 1973091] Re: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

hen I have run "ink -p usb" and got the expected result: ink 0.5.3 (c) 2018 Markus Heinz hp deskjet 5550 Black: 0% Color: 0% Therefore with the updated libusb packages the segfault does not occur anymore. Thank you f

[Bug 1973091] Re: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

** Attachment added: "whoopsie file for incident added" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libusb-1.0/+bug/1973091/+attachment/5588779/+files/_usr_bin_ink.1000.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1973091] Re: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

** Tags added: jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973091 Title: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.l

[Bug 1973091] Re: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

To my knowledge this issue is not related to the Linux kernel, but to the libusb-1.0-0 package. ** Changed in: libusb-1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1973091] Re: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => libusb-1.0 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973091 Title: Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink To manage notifications

[Bug 1973091] [NEW] Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

/libc.so.6 #8 0x5795 in ?? () I have compiled libusb-1.0.26 into my $HOME and pointed LD_LIBRARY_PATH to it. Then I get the expected result: ink -p usb ink 0.5.3 (c) 2018 Markus Heinz hp deskjet 5550 Black: 0% Color: 0

[Bug 1971168]

(In reply to Al Savage from comment #6) > [...] it may not be limited to FF, snaps, or even Mozilla, since my Chrome > install behaves similarly. You are right, this is actually affecting other applications, too. I get the exact same behavior described in the steps to reproduce when using Chromiu

[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share

I've updated the bug to reflect that multiple applications are affected by this. On my system I can reproduce the issue with Firefox and Chromium, both installed via snap. ** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Steps to reproduce:

[Bug 1971967] [NEW] TestInotifyOverflow test fails on newer host systems

Public bug reported: The included TestInotifyOverflow test unexpectedly fails on newer host systems if the host system's fs.inotify.max_queued_events is greater than 128*1024: [2022-05-06T11:15:11+0200] ubuntu@pbuilder-amd64:/var/cache/pbuilder/tmp/podman_buildah_skopeo% grep FAIL golang-fsnoti

[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share

Corresponding bug in Mozilla bugtracker: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767316 ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1767316 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767316 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1971191] Re: No Ubuntu Desktop option in tasksel, in Ubuntu Server 22.04

Same issue. I chose one of the Gnome options and my desktop now appears to be Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971191 Title: No Ubuntu Desktop option in tasksel, in Ubuntu Serv

[Bug 1971168] Re: [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share

** Description changed: Steps to reproduce: 1. Run Firefox as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 2. Have a SMB file server available where the network shares can be mounted just by clicking on the share in Nautilus file manager (smb:// protocol, usually mounted dynamically via `/var/run/use

[Bug 1971168] [NEW] [snap] Downloaded files not saved when saving to local network share

Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1. Run Firefox as a Snap package in Ubuntu 22.04 2. Have a SMB file server available where the network shares can be mounted just by clicking on the share in Nautilus file manager (smb:// protocol, usually mounted dynamically via `/var/run/user/.../gvfs/

[Bug 1784774] Re: snapd is not autofs aware and fails with nfs home dir

It may also be worth noting that Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication for NFS works a bit differently from Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication for applications, because NFS happens in the kernel, and therefore the kernel needs to get access to the Kerberos tickets (credentials). The kernel's NFS client does s

[Bug 1968258] Re: Data corruption in qemu_rbd_co_block_status

Hi Christian, thanks you very much for getting this out of the door so fast! I can confirm that new version with the patches resolves the issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968258

[Bug 1968258] [NEW] Data corruption in qemu_rbd_co_block_status

Public bug reported: Hi Christian, we have started testing jammy and triggered a qemu bug which has already been fixed upstream. The qemu 6.2 in jammy has currently a buggy implementation of .bdrv_co_block_status in block/rbd. This can result in data corruption and/or crash of the instance. ht

[Bug 337377] Re: please restore netselect package: it's _not_ debian-specific

Any news on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337377 Title: please restore netselect package: it's _not_ debian-specific To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 1772451]

Reproducible on: Version: 7.3.0.3 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 0f246aa12d0eee4a0f7adcefbf7c878fc2238db3 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR); UI: fr-FR Calc: CL -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1772439]

The problem seems to have been resolved on LO 7.3.0.3 on Windows 10. To test PDF output this time, I used Adobe Acrobat DC 2021.011.20039 64-bit. I haven't tested on Linux, where the problem initially appeared. Version: 7.3.0.3 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 0f246aa12d0eee4a0f7adcefbf7c87

[Bug 1772445]

Reproducible on: Version: 7.3.0.3 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 0f246aa12d0eee4a0f7adcefbf7c878fc2238db3 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR); UI: fr-FR Calc: CL -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >