Wine developer here. FWIW, here's some of the big changes between 1.1.42 and
1.2:
more complete 64/32 bit wine sharing, better fonts on LCD's (fontconfig taken
from user settings), better support for .Net apps, long standing opening urls
in browser bug fixed, fixes for Microsoft Office 2007, uTo
Screenshot of website.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51917335/Screenshot.png
--
"Report Broken Web Site" option missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605336
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "screenshot"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51917312/Screenshot-Report%20a%20bug%20about%20%E2%80%9Cfirefox%E2%80%9D%20package%20in%20Ubuntu%20%3A%20Bugs%20%3A%20%E2%80%9Cfirefox%E2%80%9D%20package%20%3A%20Ubuntu%20-%20Mozilla%20Firefox.png
** Attachment added: "Dependenci
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
I wanted to report a broken website to Firefox developers, but the
option is missing for me in lucid / firefox 3.6.6.
Website is https://www.citicards.com/cards/wv/home.do, it loads fine at
first, then the top 4/5's or so is blanked out, and I ca
Public bug reported:
configure: libv4l 32-bit development files not found.
configure: Finished. Do 'make' to compile Wine.
Wine needs libv4l, so I've installed libv4l-dev, just like any other
dependency, but since it lacks 32-bit compatibility libs in ia32-libs,
configure can't detect it.
Work
Is that just for Lucid, or is it backported to Karmic?
--
mpg123: breaks 32-bit wine compile on x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456132
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Perfect, thanks! This worked in an older release, I suppose udev's
gotten smarter. I'll update the rule accordingly.
Thanks for your patience/help!
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: linux-firmware
Upon upgrade of a server running karmic from
linux-image-2.6.31-18-generic-pae
Sure, understandable. I considered marking it invalid myself, but it
seems there may be a bug in udev, if it's considering that a
match...Should I file a separate bug (against udev)?
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Reviewing that log showed the problem:
Mar 4 10:23:22 SERVER1 udevd[313]: seq 1210 queued, 'remove' 'module'
Mar 4 10:23:22 SERVER1 udevd[313]: passed 107 bytes to monitor 0x21c081f0
Mar 4 10:23:22 SERVER1 udevd-work[9630]: seq 1210 running
Mar 4 10:23:22 SERVER1 udevd-work[9630]: RUN
'socket:
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug
r...@server1:~# udevadm monitor --property
monitor will print the received events for:
UDEV - the event which udev sends out after rule processing
KERNEL - the kernel uevent
KERNEL[1267652192.053081] remove /devices/pci:00/:00:07.0/net/eth0
(net)
UDEV_LOG=3
ACTION=remove
DEVPATH=/device
Just the usual:
Mar 3 13:36:25 SERVER1 kernel: [73609.467294] e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network
Driver, 3.5.24-k2-NAPI
Mar 3 13:36:25 SERVER1 kernel: [73609.467304] e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2006
Intel Corporation
Mar 3 13:36:25 SERVER1 kernel: [73609.467410] e100 :00:07.0: PCI->APIC IRQ
tran
Yes, it's not there by default. I was desperate and tried putting it in
/lib/firmware/e100 based on a google search and similar results for
other distros (fedora, I believe).
Tried it anyway, to be sure:
r...@server1:/lib/firmware# rm -rf e100/
r...@server1:/lib/firmware# rmmod e100 && modprobe e1
aus...@server1:~$ dpkg -l | grep udev
ii libudev0 147~-6.1 udev
library
ii udev 147~-6.1
rule-based device node and kernel event mana
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load
Rebooting made no difference in /var/log/syslog.
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
I will bring it down for a reboot in a couple hours. If you need any
more debugging done not involving a reboot before then, please let me
know.
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notific
@Chase Douglas:
Something fishy may be going on...those debug messages weren't
triggered.
I used:
patch < firmware.sh.patch
modprobe -r e100
modprobe e100
tail /var/log/syslog
which showed:
Mar 2 14:37:04 SERVER1 kernel: [407483.499357] e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network
Driver, 3.5.24-k2-NAPI
Mar
aus...@server1:/lib$ find . -name *_ucode\.bin | xargs sha1sum | sort
0ba83d215330e99e829963d22c74e6b464016060
./firmware/2.6.31-16-generic-pae/e100/d102e_ucode.bin
0ba83d215330e99e829963d22c74e6b464016060
./firmware/2.6.31-17-generic/e100/d102e_ucode.bin
0ba83d215330e99e829963d22c74e6b46401606
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980048/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980065/UdevLog.txt
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Tags added: apport-collected
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.laun
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980059/UdevDb.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980056/ProcModules.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980055/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980054/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980053/Lsusb.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980050/Lspci.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39980046/BootDmesg.txt
--
e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 2:
ls: cannot access /dev/snd/: No such file or directory
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Ma
Forgot the lspci of the card:
00:07.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100
(rev 08)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 100c
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-firmware
Upon upgrade of a server running karmic from linux-image-2.6.31-18-generic-pae
to linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic-pae, network connectivity was lost. dmesg
reports:
[ 77.481635] e100 :00:07.0: firmware: requesting e100/d101m_ucode.bi
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34025539/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34025540/XsessionErrors.txt
--
mpg123: breaks 32-bit wine compile on x86_64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456132
You re
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mpg123
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/austin/wine-git/dlls/winemp3.acm'
ccache gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wstrict-prototypes
Public bug reported:
I was on Jaunty, using libpng12-dev (among others) to compile wine.
Yesterday, upgraded to karmic and found that wine is not detecting
libpng as installed. It seems it only has 64-bit libraries, and no
32-bit as before.
** Affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecide
Still present in Jaunty. Using SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 still works around it.
--
ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
Contacted author to report bug upstream, he identified the problem
quickly. There is a trailing space on the $version in the debian control
file, which works for .deb, but chokes for rpm.
My problem is fixed, but the bug is still there. Ideally, alien should
strip off trailing spaces.
--
alien f
Linux ubuntu 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 18:59:16 UTC 2009 i686
GNU/Linux
Ubuntu 8.10
Alien 8.72
also tried 8.76 from author's site, same problem.
--
alien fails to convert deb to rpm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Public bug reported:
Trying to convert a custom program (it's really simple, just a set of
files in /opt/program, and some shortcuts), fails when converting
through alien:
aus...@ubuntu:~$ rm -rf program-1.8.0/ ; sudo alien -r
program-1.8.0.1-1_i386.deb
[sudo] password for austin:
Warning: Ski
Public bug reported:
'source foo.sh' in a shell scripts (#!/bin/sh). I often use
checkbashisms as a first step in identifying problems for portability
purposes. checkbashisms didn't notice this, until I ran it on
OpenSolaris, where it failed massively.
aus...@midna:~/bordeaux$ checkbashisms -v
Th
Still present in Hardy.
--
Gproftpd eats 100% CPU when launched, blank menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
Ping
--
Gproftpd eats 100% CPU when launched, blank menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244571
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gproftpd
I'm about to go on a vacation, and before leaving, was checking our
ftp/fileserver for any problems and showing my coworker how to
administrate some things. When testing gproftpd, I found that it's
eating 100% of cpu, and never drawing it's scree
Scott Richie asked me to comment here:
This is in a feisty vm running on a Windows XP host. I build wine from
git daily, in ~/wine-git/, but use WineHQ's repository to keep a copy of
the current stable release for bug testing (easier than recompiling the
stable each time I want to test it). My git
Seems to be a problem with wine gecko. The current feisty package didn't
have this problem, gutsy's do. However, I'm a bit busy ATM, so I'll
close this as invalid now that I've found the problem. This bug has been
sending me on a wild goose chase for almost a week now...
** Changed in: wine (Ubunt
Also tried downgrading wine to a known good working version, so the
problem is not a wine bug.
--
Wine crashes when ran from any folder other than build directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195824
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "crash.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12236441/crash.txt
--
Wine crashes when ran from any folder other than build directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195824
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: wine
Wine, whether from winehq packages, built from git, or using ubuntu's
packages, is constantly crashing for me whenever run in a directory
other than the build directory. I am only seeing this error in a
virtualbox feisty machine (XP SP2 host), my fei
46 matches
Mail list logo