FYI, it's now easier to interface with Geoclue2 if you don't mind a dep
on glib/gio:
http://zee-nix.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/geoclue-convenience-library-just-got.html
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/geoclue/docs/libgeoclue/GClueSimple.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are
commit: 4ad5069d95d681c716074d8bbfc40b6312fdbd66
wifi: Add a missing NULL check
This avoids a crash if we get a NULL as BSS list from wpa_supplicant.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
(In reply to marius from comment #5)
> Seems like this is fixed in GeoClue2 codebase. I see that it is using libmm
> library, and see the use of MM_MODEM_LOCATION_SOURCE_3GPP_LAC_CI in
> "src/gclue-modem-source.c" as pointed to in comment #1.
That is correct.
--
You received this bug notificatio
(In reply to Guilherme Gonçalves [:ggp] from comment #24)
> I had a look at geoclue2 and as far as I can see it's Linux-only so far,
> right? If so, it will be kind of difficult for me to work on this, as I'm
> currently on a Mac.
Ryan Lortie recently made it work on the basic level (only IP-based
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #20)
> We're currently working on geoclue2, a trimmed down, more secure version of
> geoclue. See:
> http://www.hadess.net/2013/04/geocluing-desktop-slowly.html
> for some details.
>
> I'll try and update the code here if it hasn't changed too much since, w
Closing all bugs on old geoclue. If your bug still applies to new
geoclue, please do re-open, I really don't have time to go through each
and every bug and evaluate separately. :( Apologies for any
inconvenience caused by this change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Closing all bugs on old geoclue. If your bug still applies to new
geoclue, please do re-open, I really don't have time to go through each
and every bug and evaluate separately. :( Apologies for any
inconvenience caused by this change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
(In reply to comment #3)
> So where should a new bug for the 2.x codebase be filed instead?
Right here on this bz, just that older bugs don't apply to new code.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
FWIW, debian is shipping the i386 version:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gnome-
boxes&searchon=names&suite=unstable§ion=all
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066203
Title:
Public bug reported:
I see that you guys are only shipping 64-bit build of gnome-boxes. If
this is because of the fact that gnome-boxes 3.4 did not really work on
32-bit x86 hardware, I thought I should let you know that we have
removed that limitation so please do build and ship 32-bit build as
w
found out that this bug belongs to ad-hoc wifi networking and bridging
has nothing to do with it.
--
bridge produces duplicate packets
https://launchpad.net/bugs/46644
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
11 matches
Mail list logo
