[Bug 568090] Re: ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter

2011-04-01 Thread Musaraigne
Oh yes, my bad, it wasn't a duplicate. However I think that most of the respondents probably suffered from this bug and not the one you described. If you think your bug still needs to be fixed on 2.6.32 feel free to unmark it as a duplicate. It's very interesting that you don't have the problem wi

[Bug 568090] Re: ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter

2011-04-01 Thread Musaraigne
Kernel developers are looking into it and may need some testing or feedback: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30342 I can't do testing myself as the computer on which I encountered the bug was not mine. ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #30342 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/s

[Bug 565892] Re: ath5k driver (AR2413): dropped packets, high latency

2011-03-01 Thread Musaraigne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 568090 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568090 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 568090 ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter * You can subscribe to bug 568090 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/li

[Bug 568090] Re: ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter

2011-03-01 Thread Musaraigne
What exactly is holding this bug back? The bug is 1 year old, has a low-impact temporary fix, has been reproduced many times (including duplicates like bug 565892), and makes wifi almost entirely unusable to anyone unaware of the workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 568090] Re: ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter

2010-12-30 Thread Musaraigne
I still have the same problem on a fully updated Maverick (installed from scratch from the 10.10 CD). Before learning about this nohwcrypt workaround I did a bit of investigation and found the following: The cause of the high and unpredictable latencies is that packets are dropped depending on t