Oh yes, my bad, it wasn't a duplicate. However I think that most of the
respondents probably suffered from this bug and not the one you
described. If you think your bug still needs to be fixed on 2.6.32 feel
free to unmark it as a duplicate.
It's very interesting that you don't have the problem with an AR2413,
though. I don't have other tests aside from trying other packet sizes,
but if you use this computer daily you would quickly notice sluggish
performance if you were affected by the problem.
Perhaps the "Subsystem:" line of lspci -vnn could be an indicator:
(scottl, unaffected by the bug)
06:01.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR2413 802.11bg
NIC [168c:001a] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Atheros Communications Inc. Device [168c:2052]
(Jan-Olof Lindqvist and exogenetic, likely affected by the bug)
09:04.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR2413 802.11bg
NIC [168c:001a] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Askey Computer Corp. Device [144f:7094]
That's a small sample size, it would be nice to see if other AR2413
users have the same pattern.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568090
Title:
ath5k should be loaded with nohwcrypt parameter
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
