[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance

2009-01-23 Thread Milan Oravec
Today I have tested intel 2.6 drivers and 2.6.28 kernel. I can't report any improvement in 2D compiz performance setup is same as in my previous posts. I've tried kernel with PAE enabled and disabled, system is i386 (32 bit), acceleration UXA and the same error in log: (EE) intel(0): Failed to se

[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance

2009-01-15 Thread Milan Oravec
Thank's Jeffrey. Yes, you are right. Glxgers performance was limited due vsync settings. In 2.6.27 kernel with disabled vsync and unchanged conf. form my previous posts is now glxgers performance: r...@migo-vaio:/etc# glxgears Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic. 3280 frames in 5.0

[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance

2009-01-14 Thread Milan Oravec
I'm sure I've HW acceleration on all the tests: Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic. direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 945GM 20080716 x86/MMX/SSE2 and r...@migo-vaio:~/# glxgears Failed to initialize GEM. Falling back to classic. 293 frames in 5.0 s

[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance

2009-01-13 Thread Milan Oravec
I'm also suffering under this issues. My hw is i945GM in sony vaio sz1xp, distribution is ubuntu interpid with Jaunty xorg-edgers ppa packages. I always compile my own kernel which exactly suits my hw, and have tux on ice support. When I'm on 2.6.28 kernel, I'm able to enable GEM via UXA option in

[Bug 160711] tux on ice compile problem

2007-11-07 Thread Milan Oravec
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 Hi! After some investigations we have found bug with compilation of linux-source-2.6.22 witch enhanced hibernation (tux on ice), see description bellow: It looks to me like Gutsy is broken without TuxOnIce in the case where CONFIG_BLK