> /etc/default/grub is clean
Please share its contents, and that of /etc/default/grub.d as well
anyways
> , and there are no significant manual edits in /etc/grub.d/
Please also share any "insignificant" manual edits..
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You rece
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112179
Title:
Cannot pass unescaped double quotes to the linux command line
To manage
Uploaded this, it seems reasonable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116328
Title:
iptables-netflow-dkms FTBFS in Questing with 6.15 kernel
To manage notifications about this bug go t
I have synced this.
** Changed in: lenovolegionlinux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: lenovolegionlinux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
It looks like this might not be fixed in call cases:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2119155
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hmm okay in that case this is duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2060695 and that
bug should be re-opened as still not fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
etups might brake in the
future in other ways.
Mate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866
Title:
grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
To manage notifications about
Everything was built against correct u-boot and grub.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Try
> echo "set grub-pc/cloud_style_installation false" | sudo debconf-communicate
Then do
> sudo dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc
And select /dev/sda and /dev/sdb when asked for disks.
That should fix this issue, but the question is, did this installation
come from a cloud image? Or what media was used
I am just curious, how did you end up with this OS installation?
We've seen a few like these before, it looks like it came from a cloud
image, but it is on RAID?
cloud_style_installation: true should only be set in cloud images for
what it is worth.
--
You received this bug notification because
Hmm i wonder how did you end with a raid setup on an installation that
looks like it came from a cloud image?
you can fix it by setting
> echo "set grub-pc/cloud_style_installation false" | sudo debconf-communicate
then doing
> dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc
--
You received this bug notification beca
I believe that is the case for riscv binaries already, only arm binaries
were held back, no?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118787
Title:
[SRU] [noble] Rebuild cd-boot-images-* for .
Done riscv64 just now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2118787
Title:
[SRU] [noble] Rebuild cd-boot-images-* for .3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
I think I can upload risc-v as well know, the u-boot we are depending on
for risc-v is already in updates, only arm64 was a problem which is not
relevant for cd-boot-images-arm64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Try `dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64` and select the correct disk Ubuntu
is installed on when asked.
This is either a case of the installation having been moved to a
different disk, or possibly a case of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2083176
--
You received this bug notifi
Public bug reported:
This isn't really a regular SRU, the bootloader assets in question are
already part of noble and tested, these packages are just technical debt
in the process of being eliminated.
** Affects: cd-boot-images-amd64 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Af
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116736
Title:
[25.10 FEAT] Upgrade cryptsetup to latest v2.8.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116736
Title:
[25.10 FEAT] Upgrade cryptsetup to latest v2.8.0
To manage noti
I can probably do the merge from experimental unless someone already
picked this up?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 8:15 PM Sebastien Bacher
<2116...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Medium => High
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you a
Incomplete
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mate Kukri (mkukri) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: Mate Kukri (mkukri) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Summary changed:
- 25.04 beta TPMFDE: first boot failure
+ grub2+sys
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Adriano Cordova Fedeli (adrianoco) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Plucky)
Assignee: Adriano Cordova Fedeli (adrianoco) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Summary changed:
- GRUB (re)installation failing due to stale grub-{pc,efi}/install_devices
+ GRUB (re)installation failing due to stale grub-{pc,efi}/install_devices
(implement UUID based grub-install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Only ESM updates are left which are tracked separately and will only
land in the ESM ppa so marking those releases as 'Invalid' for archive
uploads.
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Invalid
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20
wrote:
>
> On ven. 11 juil. 2025 15:15:08, Mate Kukri wrote:
> > We shouldn't be handling cryptsetup downstream, it should be updated in
> > Debian first (which I am sure the maintainers are working on), then
> > merged.
>
> No. That's only true if you ei
We shouldn't be handling cryptsetup downstream, it should be updated in
Debian first (which I am sure the maintainers are working on), then
merged.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2116736
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* The aim of this bug is to stop using the package cd-boot-images-* in noble.
This has been done for plucky in LP: #2086841. This is similar, but an SRU.
+ * Cd-boot-images caused a duplication of binary bootloader assets, resulting
+in increas
** Summary changed:
- Please remove cd-boot-images-* from noble
+ Stop using cd-boot-images-* in noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112584
Title:
Stop using cd-boot-images-* in no
Title still wrong rest okay.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112584
Title:
Please remove cd-boot-images-* from noble
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Does not seem to affect kernel.
** No longer affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Focal)
** No longer affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Jammy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
So this definitely will not get a CVE, please post the patch to grub-
devel mailing list.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2114
/en/latest/reference/services/signing/
The script that does the concatenation mentioned above is part of the
grub2-signed source package which is provided in the previously
discussed PPA (you can use apt source for example to acquire it).
Mate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is not a setup created by the Ubuntu installer is it?
I believe ESP on RAID is not created by the Ubuntu installer and not
supported by GRUB2, please use multi ESP support we have for the same
purpose.
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received t
Seems like your /etc/default/grub is corrupt, please double check that.
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112
This is good, but grub2 MP needs to be re-filed against correct repo at
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/grub/+git/ubuntu.
Also I am not sure if there is much benefit to actually removing the cd-
boot-images packages (removal SRUs are super rare) in case a user relies
on them, but updat
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995751
Title:
update to 2.04-1ubuntu47.4 drops zz-update-grub
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995751
Title:
update to 2.04-1ubuntu47.4 drops zz-update-grub
To manage not
ESP on RAID is not supported in Ubuntu GRUB because we don't create such
configurations.
Unlike other distros, there is also no reason to do this because we have
multi ESP support in the GRUB package.
You can just RAID your regular filesystems and have two (or N) ESPs, one
on each disks and GRUB
Was this RAID setup created by the Ubuntu Installer, or did you create
it yourself?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112229
Title:
failure during update package grub-efi-amd64-signed w
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2112179
Title:
Cannot pass unesca
Yes I can look into picking up the new patches.
Re: signature size allocation, the binary build and signing happens at
different stages on purpose, so allocating the exact size is impossible,
and one binary might even be signed with different keys. (Also extra
space is intended to leave room for m
Hi Dann,
I hope the bug this is trigerring will be fixed in the questing cycle
and then we can re-enable the memory attribute protocol by default.
I am not against syncing this now, but re-enabling NX by default might
still cause problems with older distros/releases that wont carry all the
necess
nullboot on focal was beta only and this bug is 3 years old, so closing.
if you are experiencing it on newer ubuntu and nullboot, please report a
new bug.
** Changed in: nullboot (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
new upstream release; usual vendored dependency updates per Go MIR policy
(vendor/ directory is automatically generated by go mod vendor based on go.mod).
Targeted releases: noble, jammy
[Test plan]
* Test suite passes
* Deploy Azure CVM and TPM FDE
* Upgrade to t
Yes everything with appended signatures built in that PPA is signed
using that certificate.
It should hopefully verify correctly, and can be used for testing, but
please note that it is not to be used in production.
Kind regards,
Mate Kukri
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Uploaded again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104572
Title:
Booting the daily noble RISC-V installer image fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
The test grub has a slightly older version number, you can install the
exact versions using:
apt install \
grub-ieee1275-signed=1.209.1+powersb7+2.12-5ubuntu7+powersb9 \
grub-ieee1275=2.12-5ubuntu7+powersb9 \
grub-ieee1275-bin=2.12-5ubuntu7+powersb9 \
grub-common=2.12-5ubuntu7+powersb9 \
grub2-com
I don't believe this is an edk2 problem.
The GRUB side will be resolved by picking up Vladimir's patch from grub-
devel.
** No longer affects: edk2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Pushed a test build of phcoder's mshared patches to the uefi team build
ppa
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106208
Title:
Relocation overflow in GRUB when booting with RISC-V EDK II a
Verification done, test matrix here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a5tlAWPNriB2JvvItAb-
ISSYnQlcmdVm2mesuM2jC3c/edit?tab=t.0
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular
** Tags added: verifica
Can you try booting the hard-disk via the same boot menu you booted the
installer from?
Some devices unfortunately have issues where the boot UI is included in
the measurements and if you autoboot the HDD without going through the
menu it fails.
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107408
Title:
do-release-upgrade
This still needs a grub2 upload and systemd stub change to properly fix
so i wouldnt remove, edk2 is only a workaround.
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this
My dev PPA can be added with
add-apt-repository ppa:mkukri/dev-ppc64el
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064319
Title:
Power guest secure boot with key management: GRUB2 portion
To m
This is waiting to be signed at https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-
signing-jobs/+bug/2106805
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106728
Title:
grub-efi-arm64 fails with out of memory e
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Plucky)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Plucky)
Ah the changelog entry post facto fixup was my bad, cleaned up the git
history after the mistake in the original upload, but we can rid of that
change.
> The rootfs should be the only filesystem in the image containing a file named
> /.disk/info. If not, we risk loading an incorrect filesystem.
I
So update is im 99% sure this a is bad interaction between the systemd
UKI stub and the memory attribute protocol...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104316
Title:
25.04 beta TPMFDE: f
I made the judgement that picking up those patches alongside the new
ones marked as security fixes has a lower overall regression potential
compared to me trying to untangle the security fixes from the old(er)
XFS patches.
Perhaps not a perfect solution, but in GRUB world there never is, we've
don
> This makes sense because other systems boot after all. Is this "borked
hooking" only in newer systemds? (because Noble TPM FDE installs
apparently work with plucky ovmf)
Hmm I am not sure, I'll look into this in more detail as part of fixing
this bug properly after edk2 workaround is done.
> Yo
Sorry the test plan perhaps could have been clearer:
- The automated tests do _not_ currently include XFS.
- "create an XFS /boot; boot from it" was part of the manual tests planned
Updated test plan now.
** Description changed:
Just to be clear this is now the tracking bug for all GRUB2 CVE f
NUMA nodes usually represents two or more pieces of silicon, each with
memory connected to them directly, but where both are also
interconnected into a proper SMP system using some bus like DMI.
Which means memory all memory is logically accessible to all processors
same ways as UMA SMP system, bu
I think NUMA here is just causing the memory map to have big enough
holes in it, and the allocator to behave in such a way that some
relocations will have addends that overflow a 32-bit signed slot.
We had the same issue exposed by a 4GB memory limit here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
GRUB issue is that peimage tries to write relocations addends to read-
only sections after setting them read only
But i suspect fixing that will make the GRUB problem be the same as the
firmware direct boot problem, so we nicely caught two bugs here.
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Status
these are fixed.
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Ass
Uploaded noble with the version number change mentioned in the MP, and
committed to ~ubuntu-core-dev/cd-boot-images-riscv64.
If the same debian-cd breakage is happening on jammy and/or oracular,
please file MPs for those too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mate Kukri (mkukri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104316
Title:
25.04 beta TPM
Also keep in mind that the /EndEntire message was simply removed from
GRUB a while back, so that not showing up means nothing by itself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104316
Title:
I wouldn't discount an edk2 regression here, ive seen another recently
too.
Will try to look into this today.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104316
Title:
25.04 beta TPMFDE: first b
Maybe the presence of the mem attr protocol triggers edk2 to change
memory attributes to NX on allocated buffer for even explicitly non-NX
images...
We have an optional NX compat chain available in the shim package
(that's off by default) and all this was tested a while ago, but at that
point the
Hello,
Code https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/grub/+git/ubuntu/+ref/power-sb
My PPC test PPA (the power-sb ppa is out of date):
https://launchpad.net/~mkukri/+archive/ubuntu/dev-ppc64el
Signing key for the PPA above:
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/mkukri/dev-ppc64el/ubuntu/dists/plu
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101797
Title:
built-in shell still present in AAVMF secboot image
To manage
Branches for the noble and oracular fixes are here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2/+ref/ubuntu/noble
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+git/edk2/+ref/ubuntu/oracular
Seems like the SRU team wants this released as a security
But also we should test arm64 AAVMF VMs too, the laptops might be fine,
but maybe AAVMF loads the core high?
It is also possible that the arm64 module loader is correct in the sense
that it allows modules to be loaded anywhere without overflowing
relocations.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
It seems like risc-v EFI loads the core high, and restricting dynamic
allocations <=4GB causes modules to be loaded low.
Then the module loader tries to patch up some relocations with the delta
between some symbols in the core and the module, but it fails due to the
large offset.
Modules should b
Welp, we need to remove the 4gb address limit on risc-v i think.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103864
Title:
grub-efi-riscv64-bin 2.12-5ubuntu9 fails with "relocation overflow"
To
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101797
Title:
built-in shell still present in AAVMF secboot image
To manage notif
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055835
Title:
GRUB 2025 spring security update
To manage noti
This was fixed in debian sid already.
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * A large batch of secure boot CVEs in GRUB2 were fixed earlier this
+ year and recently un-embargoed earlier.
+
+ * This has an obvious impact on everyone relying on Secure Boot for any
+ purpose.
+
+ [ Test Plan
Was verified a long time ago and not released, but 14.8 will
cumulatively include this fix, so mentioning this if and when a reviewer
of that will inevitably run into this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
This is all verified now, and because 14.8 will cumulatively include
this fix, it is worth mentioning this if and when a reviewer of that
will inevitably run into this.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verifi
No doubt it isn't really on the radar for Landscape, but I would be
inclined to include Oracular as well if this gets uploaded before
Oracular goes EOL.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21
affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mate Kukri (mkukri)
Status: New
The overall security model of the CA on which we would sign such UKIs
already allows loading external initrds without a UKI being used.
This would be for the simple convenience of being able to use the stub
purely as a (temporary) mechanism for signing dtbs and the kernel
together, not to provide
Hi Dann, News entry is fine by me, i've already worked around this for
my usecase, but others might run into this as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069439
Title:
edk2 2024.05-1
> The grub file system drivers have a huge number of security issues and
we should run them isolated, they should be using user namespaces, mount
namespaces to hide / or have it all readonly, and like empty network
namespaces so they can't phone home.
No doubt about that, but in a perfect world e
Im gonna set this public if this is just an apparmor rule issue.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099811
Title:
Os-prober s
What filesystem and/or device mapper container your /boot is located on?
If /boot is not writable from GRUB the 30 second timeout is expected
behaviour due to recordfail not working.
A 30 second timeout should not happen if grub can write to /boot.
--
You received this bug notification because
The short answer is that we do not support an F2FS /boot filesystem and
support is not built into signed monolithic GRUB for that reason.
If you need to have an F2FS root partition, you can use a separate /boot
with a supported file system as you suggested.
If you insist on having F2FS as /boot,
Public bug reported:
Platform: UTM virtual machine on arm64 macOS
ISO: 24.04.2 465 milestone build, arm64 server ISO.
Issue:
Console output only shows up on the serial port without manually
specifying console=tty0.
** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
Public bug reported:
serial.mod not included in signed GRUB2 for Jammy and older.
** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mate Kukri (mkukri)
Status: New
** Tags: foundations-todo
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu
The debug counter crash is likely the same as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2086104.
Afaik this version of bpftrace has a linking issue against LLVM where it
sometimes pulls in a static and a shared copy into the same process and
when the versions mismatch it fails.
Ther
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073634
Title:
[SRU] Enable suppression of /EndEntire message
To mana
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076651
Title:
[SRU] Crash on RISC-V in virtual machine using KVM
To m
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
1 - 100 of 1020 matches
Mail list logo
