[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

Thanks for the update Daniel. I cannot confirm the fix in 12.04/10 because I stopped using Unity because of this bug. I guess if nobody else confirms/denies you can just close it. If I switch back to Unity and still have issues I'll open another issue. -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

Here is the strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized. ** Attachment added: "strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580682/+files/maximized -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

To be clear, I can reproduce this with any progress bar. The easiest is a file copy: 1) Start file copy of a reasonable (10's to 100's) of files which will last a few minutes 2) Peek at `top`, notice compiz is using 15%+ CPU and system has become extremely laggy 3) Minimize progress bar, notice

[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

Here is the strace of compiz when the copy-progress-bar is minimized. ** Attachment added: "strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is minimized" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580681/+files/minimized -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

** Attachment added: "lsof of compiz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387/+attachment/2580646/+files/lsof -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy o

[Bug 884387] [NEW] Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU

Public bug reported: Since upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10, I've noticed incredibly poor performance with Compiz and progress bars. For example, I just attempted a network copy of a directory of files (10's of them). My computer ground to a halt while the copy went, but as soon as I minimized the pr

[Bug 776261] Re: xdg-settings fails: awk: cannot open /home/user/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list (No such file or directory)

I too am affected by this bug. Touching the file resolved the issue for me. I am on i686 and its a 10.10-upgraded install of Natty (Unity). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776261 Title:

[Bug 772177] Re: Alt+Tab "Feels" slow

FWIW, this setting is configurable under 'Window Management' -> 'Static Application Switcher', under the 'Behaviour' tab. And yes, 0.2 makes no sense so much so I came looking to file a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 367175] Re: thunderbird not using indicator applet

Evolution's Exchange plugin is broken for Exchange 2007+, so there really is no reason to use Evolution anymore. I'm using DavMail + Thunderbird + Lightning to talk to Exchange at work, and (IMO) it's a much happier experience than using Outlook on Windows. The only piece of the puzzle missing is

[Bug 493314] Re: gnomebaker exits unexpectedly

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509056/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509057/XsessionErrors.txt -- gnomebaker exits unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493314 You received this bug

[Bug 493314] [NEW] gnomebaker exits unexpectedly

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnomebaker *** glibc detected *** gnomebaker: free(): invalid pointer: 0x094cdcd8 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c95ff1] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c976f2] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0x6c9a79d] /usr/lib

[Bug 490976] Re: Ubuntu looses internet connection after 10 minutes.

Summary: * Boot up * Start workflow (open IRC, browse Internet).. all is peachy * Random amount of time later: no new connections can be made (IRC stays connected, but can't browse Internet and so forth) * Rebooting only fixes this after a cooloff period * Problem does not present on Windows --

[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault

Thanks. That sounds reasonable to me. -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b.

[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault

What is the C++ behaviour if no QApplication is made? Surely it doesn't segfault as well? -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings

[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874367/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874368/XsessionErrors.txt -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45459

[Bug 454597] [NEW] Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault

Public bug reported: $ irb irb(main):001:0> require 'Qt4' => true irb(main):002:0> Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() (irb):2: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux] ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 18 13:38:38 2009 DistroRelease: Ub