I originally reported this issue but can no longer reproduce it
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354
Title:
Crash
Many years later I can no longer reproduce this
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365
Title:
mdadm does not add spa
Evidence that --offroot is being used by systemd during boot:
Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[430]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental
/dev/sdc1 --offroot' failed with exit code 1.
Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[428]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental
/dev/sdb1 --offroot' failed with
I experienced and reported this issue on Ubuntu 16.04, but have now
verified that it also affects Ubuntu 18.04.3.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858317
Title:
man mdadm does not docu
Public bug reported:
I can see in the logs that systemd incrementally assembles mdadm arrays
using the --incremental and --offroot options, yet the --offroot option
is not documented in the mdadm manpage.
I can see it here though: https://linux.die.net/man/8/mdadm
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease:
Here is a way (untested by me) to do what Andreas suggests:
https://marek.dopiera.pl/2018/10/03/fetchmail-imap-idle-systemd-
generators/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021699
Title:
A few days in I have now had a chance to reboot this machine once more
into the -72 kernel, and I was unable to reproduce the issue.
** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Public bug reported:
Following the linux 4.15.0-72-generic kernel update my Hauppauge 1950
tuners no longer work.
This is a production machine, so I did not have time to troubleshoot and
had to quickly recover by rebooting into the previous kernel version
(which is 4.15.0-70).
ProblemType: Bug
D
I cannot reproduce the issue at present.
But it's strange that I encountered a problem in 2016 which was fixed upstream
in 2009.
Anyway, let's close this for now.
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
This kernel update crashes my old machine (Intel Core i3-540, H55
chipset) solid on boot. It needs to be powercycled. Selecting the
previous kernel (3.13.0-139) in grub revives the machine.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.13.0-141-generic 3
I know that this is an old ticket etc, but:
I also have this card and use it in a laptop that's running Ubuntu
16.04. Meanwhile it's 16.04.3 rather than .1, but that's by the by.
The card works fine for me using the Hardware Enablement kernel.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack
O
Public bug reported:
I need the proxy to be bypassed for a number of sites. These sites are
listed in the no_proxy environment variable. However, this is ignored by
Chromium. There does not appear to be any way in Chromium (nor in the
system proxy settings) to specify sites for which the proxy sho
# fwupdmgr refresh
Failed to download
https://s3.amazonaws.com/lvfsbucket/downloads/firmware.xml.gz.asc: SSL
handshake failed
Yet that link works in a browser.
Related?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
According to discussion on the apcupsd-users mailing list [1] this issue
is OS-specific rather than being a problem in upstream apcupsd.
Specifically it is believed that this issue is due to Ubuntu shutting
down USB before the killpower command is issued to the UPS, which which
it is no longer pos
** Description changed:
- I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer)
- did against Debian:
+ I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (upstream lirc
+ maintainer) did against Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199
===b
Public bug reported:
I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer)
did against Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199
===begin===
The lirc sources used (0.9.0-pre1) is now very old (2011), lagging two
major and several minor releases behind u
On 09/07/2014 12:38 PM, Ruben Rocha wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> On 12.04 it is a bit tricky for the driver to install ok because the one
> on the fprint repo replaces the one of the deb package.
>
> Try this:
>
> sudo apt-get remove libfprint0
> install the deb again
> sudo apt-get install fprintd libp
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is
installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the
package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system
needs in order to enable pps support.
[1]: http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/201
Thank you very much. This package however requires glibc 2.17 whereas my
12.04.4 LTS system only has 2.15. Would you be able to make available a
package that works on the other currently supported Ubuntu versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Actually, the crash happens when anything is dragged in Firefox:
- attempt at reconfiguring the toolbars
- dragging a link
- ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354
Title:
Crash wh
Public bug reported:
When I try and drag a bookmark on Firefox's bookmarks toolbar, lightdm
crashes and I'm taken back to the login screen.
janc@mordor:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS
Release:12.04
janc@mordor:~$ apt-cache policy lightdm
lightdm:
Installed: 1.2.3-0
The released 2.6.32-43-generic kernel crashed after about 5 hours uptime
while the corresponding compat-wireless package was not also installed.
So I think that this validates the hypothesis that the determining
factor is the presence of the compat-wireless package (i.e. whether or
not newer ath9k
The released 2.6.32-43-generic (with the corresponding compat-wireless
package) has now been running for nearly 39 hours, so I'm going to go
ahead and remove the -43 compat-wireless package and reboot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
I have now purged all -43 and -44 kernels (i.e. the released -43 kernel
and all test kernels v1 through v5), then reinstalled the released -43
kernel, and also pulled in the compat-wireless package for -43. After
rebooting the machine has stayed up overnight.
Luis and I both had a theory about the
I guess I need to wait for a compat-wireless package to become available
that corresponds with the -44 ABI. Although I can start by installing
the -43 compat-wireless package and test that with the v1-v3 kernels you
previously built for me (just to see whether the results are any
different from the
I ran the lsmod commands just after a fresh reboot, so this doesn't seem
to be it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861
Title:
After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes a
I can now explain one class of differences between the modules loaded
under -42 versus -44. I am using the compat-wireless package, a version
of which does not yet exist for the -44 kernel (or at least: I hadn't
installed it). The two ath9k-related modules which are not being loaded
under -44 but a
I'm really sorry, but this kernel (v5) is BAD.
But I noticed that for some reason a different set of modules is being
loaded. I have no idea why. I attach a file that shows the differences
between the first column of lsmod's sorted output under each kernel (-42
and -44 v5). Why are a lot more (fil
Assuming I've managed to install the correct package from -proposed:
Linux skr03 2.6.32-44-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 17:32:45 UTC
2012 i586 GNU/Linux
the new kernel is BAD (it crashed after an hour and 10mins)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
By the way, I just noticed that I should have mentioned the presence in
the box of a wireless adapter as well. Since the box is a broadband
router it also acts as a wireless access point, using an ath9k card. No
offload options (TSO, GSO) are active on this interface.
--
You received this bug not
I can confirm that the box is stable when running -42.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861
Title:
After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours
of uptime
v4 seems to behave similarly to v3: it also crashed after many hours,
i.e. after a longer period than the released -43 package and the v1 and
v2 packages did. But it still crashed.
Once again I'm back on -42. I think I now need to stay on this package
for a couple of days just to make sure that I'
I am indeed not using ecryptfs.
I am using GSO (generic segmentation offload) on one of the ethernet
interfaces (the one that faces the LAN). Whereas the box has four
ethernet interfaces I'm using only two. One faces the LAN (eth3), the
other faces the VDSL modem (eth2), across which I set up a PP
Right. I'm glad I qualified my previous statement. It crashed after
about 20 hours, which is much longer than than it took v1 and v2 to
crash before. Could be coincidence, who knows. Going back to the -42.96
package now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
v3 has stayed up overnight, which leads me to suspect that it is GOOD.
I can't be categorical about this you understand: if it freezes it is
certain to be bad, but if it doesn't it might merely not yet have
crashed. So I'll leave it running and report back tomorrow.
--
You received this bug noti
By the way: I may be able to test a few more kernels than one per day
over the weekend. If this is a practical proposition, could you prepare
three or four packages in one go? Please only do so if it's not too much
trouble.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The v2 kernel is also BAD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861
Title:
After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours
of uptime
To manage notifications abo
The v1 kernel you gave me to test is BAD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861
Title:
After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours
of uptime
To manage no
Looking at the security notice that describes this kernel update I see
that one of the changes is to do with TCP segmentation offload. Some
additional information therefore.
This machine has four Ethernet interfaces:
root@skr03:~# lspci | grep Ethernet
00:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologie
I am the original bug reporter.
I can confirm that reverting to the previous kernel package (linux-
image-2.6.32-42-generic, version 2.6.32-42.96) returns the machine to
stability.
This is my broadband router, and my wife and I work from home a lot. I
can test kernels for you, but only overnight
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861
Title:
After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours
of uptime
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
Public bug reported:
I upgraded the kernel on this machine to linux-image-2.6.32-43-generic
yesterday, and the machine has locked up solid three times since. This
is a broadband router (Soekris net5501) without video or keyboard. I am
monitoring the serial console and no messages are output when t
@cometdog: In the iPod's Sync menu, first disable syncing with all of
your playlists. Sync. Then re-enable syncing with all of your playlists
and sync again. That did it for me (Rhythmbox 2.96 on Ubuntu 12.04 and a
30GB 4th-gen iPod).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Attachment added: "Full output of banshee --debug (start banshee, sync ipod,
quit banshee)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014985/+attachment/3195636/+files/banshee.debug.out
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Public bug reported:
Podcasts are not being synced to my ipod (30GB 4th gen). That is:
Banshee's GUI says that it transfers the files across, but then they do
not show up in the Podcasts menu, neither in Banshee nor on the device
itself. Please refer to the debug output: this is the full output of
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989532
Title:
Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
Public bug reported:
Thunderbird fails to connect to the POP and SMTP servers. These servers
reside on the same subnet. There are no error messages to speak of; the
connections just time out.
This is not a firewall problem. I have verified that I can connect to
the POP and SMTP servers using teln
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799144
Title:
Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: i8kutils
If i8kmon is started with --nouserconfig, then it reads its
configuration from /etc/i8kmon.conf, rather than /etc/i8kmon as
suggested by the manpage (last paragraph in section CONFIGURATION).
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package:
I added also-affects update-manager because this problem has clearly not
yet been fully resolved, despite the fix-released state on a number of
affected packages.
** Also affects: update-manager
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Reproduced in Maverick Meerkat.
Sorry, but it is not a reasonable request to a user to reproduce in an
as-yet-unreleased distro.
** Changed in: xcfa (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 614993 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614993
Confirmed: this is indeed a duplicate of bug 614993.
This did not jump out at me when I filed the bug though. Perhaps this is
a problem worth fixing?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 614993
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722146
Title:
Upgrade fails while calculating changes
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
While trying to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, update-manager fails with
the following error message:
Could not determine the upgrade
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
Please report this bug in the 'update-man
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697770
Title:
Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ureadahead
Two problems on the manpage:
(1) the word "content" in the second sentence explaining the --daemon
option should read "contend". So the sentence becomes "This is ignored
when reading on rotational hard drives, since it's important for
perfor
--
User interface language changed to French
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666468
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xcfa
The user interface language has inexplicably and unexpectedly changed to
French (from English).
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xcfa 3.7.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linu
Carlos,
Please can you return the status to Triaged? I'm unable to do so myself.
Thanks, Jan
C de-Avillez wrote:
> argh, wrong bug
>
> ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318
>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318
>
> ** Also affects: ntp via
>http://bugs.debi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144
Actually, the bug has been fixed when Ubuntu 9.10 adopted upstream
stable kernel release 2.6.31.7 in the form of linux-image-2.6.31-17. See
bug #480144
Ubuntu has since issued further kernel updates which als
I successfully installed and booted this kernel on a machine having a
National Semiconductor SC1200 PATA controller:
00:12.2 IDE interface: National Semiconductor Corporation SCx200, SC1100
IDE controller (rev 01)
The previous 2.6.31 kernel would crash at boot.
So I conclude that the issue "pata
Martin,
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Accepted linux into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be
> available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
> enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
>
> *
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480144
[Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel
--
[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575
You receiv
Also fixes bug #454575
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/454575):
"[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot"
--
[Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Fix released upstream in 2.6.31.6
--
[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is
/var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift
relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and
its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart.
The recent change of description of this bug suggests a particular
solution to the problem, which I think is incomplete.
The problem occurs on my machine because, although /usr is located on
the root filesystem, several of the directories under /usr are soft
links to targets on a different filesys
In case the fix does not make it to you via -stable in time for the
karmic release, here it is.
Obtained from linux-next thusly:
# git show 6d4f950e9ea15816c6a4f266ce6b9e438346771e > fix-14227.patch
** Attachment added: "fix-14227.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34357961/fix-14227.patch
Turns out the fix hadn't been submitted to stable. Jeff Garzik has now
done so.
--
[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Not fixed in the Karmic Release Candidate
--
[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
A patch has been posted on lkml:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125484259025909&w=2
--
[karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic
Kernel oops on boot into karmic generic kernel. Same thing happens on -386
kernel.
Hardware: Soekris net4801.
[4.668423] CR2: 73627653
[8.038252] ---[ end trace 0a414785c1792278 ]---
[8.093818] Kernel pa
** Attachment added: "main.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840433/main.log
--
Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
** Attachment added: "xorg_fix_intrepid.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840453/xorg_fix_intrepid.log
--
Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840413/apt.log
--
Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
When trying to upgrade to karmic beta, the following is the last bit of
output:
--begin--
Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade:
gdm: reloading...done.
dovecot: stopping...starting...done.
cron: stopping...starting...d
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock?
--
OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Filed bug #399883 against intrepid-backports so that an explicit
decision can be made on whether to backport this fix to intrepid.
--
sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I have now upgraded this system to jaunty from intrepid while running
the hardy kernel.
I confirm that the kernel included with intrepid (Linux soekris
2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 19:49:51 UTC 2009 i586)
works with the sc1200 disk controller.
So: fixed in jaunty.
Question mark re
Feel free to change back to incomplete if you disagree that the issue
needs to be resolved in 8.10 only on the strength of the facts presented
thus far
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I won't have time to test this for a few days, but my concerns are as
follows:
- intrepid (8.10) is currently a necessary step on the upgrade path from 8.04
LTS to 9.04 LTS;
- 8.10 does not boot on a system that depends on an sc1200 disk controller;
- the work-around is to boot the 8.04 LTS kerne
I apologise, the attachments I just added are related to another bug of
mine, not to this-one. Please discard these attachments.
I no longer have the requested information, because since upgrading this
machine to hardy I have further upgraded it to januty.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
xorg_fix_intrepid.log
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/xorg_fix_intrepid.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738958/xorg_fix_intrepid.log
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
https://bugs.launchp
main.log
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738949/main.log
--
Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
apt-term.log
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738937/apt-term.log
--
Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Files attached as requested. First: apt.log
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738902/apt.log
--
Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
My Soekris net4801 won't boot after the upgrade from hardy to interpid:
it can't find the root partition.
I think that this is the case because neither version of the disk
controller module (drivers/pci/sc1200, drivers/ata/pata_sc1200) is
supported in the generic config.
I c
Public bug reported:
The report produced by /etc/cron.daily/system-health contains the error
message "Specified sensor(s) not found!" on my system, instead of the
sensors report.
This is the case because /usr/bin/system-health invokes /usr/bin/sensors
with parameter lm79-isa-*. This parameter is
I'm afraid I'm not able to actually fix this
** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu)
Assignee: JanCeuleers (jan-ceuleers) => Mario Limonciello (superm1)
--
Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204
You received this bug notification because you
Here is the full list of deb files I searched through, just in case you
can point me to files I should also have inspected:
libmyth-0.20_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb
libmyth-dev_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb
mytharchive_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb
mytharchive-data_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_all.deb
mythbrowser_0.20.2-
Here's my feeble attempt at diagnosing this:
mythbuntu-control-centre_0.10-0ubuntu1_all.deb is not the smoking gun, but it
does contain the following in
data/usr/share/pycentral/mythbuntu-control-centre/site-packages/MythbuntuControlCentre/changer.py:
def write_mysql_txt(self,user,pass
Mario,
I will attempt to identify the cause of the mode squashing of this file.
It will be a fez days before I have a chance to look at this though.
Thanks, Jan
--
Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204
You received this bug notification because you
Mario,
Thanks for your comment.
Unfortunately, trying 9.04 is not an option for me right now; this is a
"production" system which has many version dependencies outside of
mythtv.
If you believe that this problem has been solved in recent versions of
mythtv (or mythbuntu) then I'm happy. Meanwhil
Public bug reported:
My frontend machine runs mythfrontend as user frontend, not as user
mythtv. I believe that this is a supported configuration.
User frontend is a member of group mythtv.
This is however not enough for user frontend to be able to read
/etc/mythtv/mysql.txt, since it has mode 6
I have been advised on the linux-raid mailing list [1] that this problem
is more likely to be caused by mkinitrd than by mdadm, and that I should
therefore file a bug against initramfs-tools.
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=123421650832520&w=2
** Also affects: initramfs-tools
Importance
I'm sorry for having let this bug linger for such a long time. I think I
have now found the proper solution to this problem.
Restating the problem: I have six disks, four of which are served by a
sata-sil24 controller, the other two being served by a sata-via
controller. The active partitions of m
Not a problem.
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
installer skips primary partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318393
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
Further tests show that what I reported does not present a problem for
the use cases I explored (other than the cosmetic aspect). Please feel
free to close the bug AFAIAC.
--
installer skips primary partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318393
You received this bug notification because you ar
Thanks for your quick response.
I don't know whether this is a cosmetic problem, as the one install I
attempted with the 1/3/5 partition layout failed (grub error 18 upon
reboot at the end of what up until that point looked like a successful
install), but several other things also differed between
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
(Not sure I got the package right)
I netbooted into the Ubuntu installer from the 7.10 ISO. Selected expert
mode. When it comes to partitioning the disk, the results are
inconsistent, depending on the order in which partitions are create
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
