[Bug 584567] Re: package grub-pc 1.98-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-05-25 Thread Graeme Harrison
I'm a long-time proponent of Ubuntu BUT in 10.04 ISO install disk, someone forgot to fix the GRUB install. I wouldn't have minded if the Lucid Install ISO CD download page has said that the install CD will not work with a previously set-up dual-boot WinXP+Ubuntu system... but just tell people it wo

Re: [Bug 280991] Re: CPU Load 20x higher than sum of 'by process' load

2008-11-03 Thread Graeme Harrison
-- CPU Load 20x higher than sum of 'by process' load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi

[Bug 280575] Re: Nautilus fails on Ctrl-X then Ctrl-V 'MOVES' on NTFS

2008-10-10 Thread Graeme Harrison
It seems that Nautilus was completely unstable by the time the above effects were noted. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280713 for subsequent 'over-delete' misbehaviour. I believe that the inability to handle large NTFS directories (some memory over-flow problem) led to the unresponsiveness

Re: [Bug 280713] Re: Dangerous Over-Delete - Large NTFS Directories can cause a 'Delete ALL'

2008-10-09 Thread Graeme Harrison
-- Dangerous Over-Delete - 'Single-File Shift-Delete' on NTFS deletes ALL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280713 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

Re: [Bug 280713] Re: Dangerous Over-Delete - 'Single-File Shift-Delete' on NTFS deletes ALL

2008-10-09 Thread Graeme Harrison
-- Dangerous Over-Delete - 'Single-File Shift-Delete' on NTFS deletes ALL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280713 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

[Bug 280991] Re: CPU Load 20x higher than sum of 'by process' load

2008-10-09 Thread Graeme Harrison
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18379267/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18379268/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18379269/ProcStatus.txt -- CPU Lo

[Bug 280991] [NEW] CPU Load 20x higher than sum of 'by process' load

2008-10-09 Thread Graeme Harrison
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor For many minutes my total CPU load has been showing at 80-100% on both CPUs on the 'Resources' display graph. Yet when I change top-tab to 'Processes' and sort by CPU, gnome-system-monitor is using c0-10%, gnome-video-thumbnailer is

[Bug 280713] [NEW] Dangerous Over-Delete - 'Single-File Shift-Delete' on NTFS deletes ALL

2008-10-09 Thread Graeme Harrison
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Like lots of people with dual-boot systems, or external USB drives that must be read elsewhere, I have some volumes which are NTFS. Using latest Ubuntu with Nautilus 2.22.5.1, I went into a user-area of my XP NTFS drive (a sub-directory within

[Bug 280575] Re: Nautilus fails on Ctrl-X then Ctrl-V 'MOVES' on NTFS

2008-10-08 Thread Graeme Harrison
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18360178/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18360179/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18360180/ProcStatus.txt -- Nautil

[Bug 280575] [NEW] Nautilus fails on Ctrl-X then Ctrl-V 'MOVES' on NTFS

2008-10-08 Thread Graeme Harrison
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I love Ubuntu Linux and shout it praises everywhere... but there are still too many niggling bugs in Nautilus v2.22.5.1 (ie current distribution - system updated). At first Nautilus was not preserving time-stamps when copying to/from NTFS driv

[Bug 215499] Re: Nautilus not preserving timestamps

2008-06-23 Thread Graeme Harrison
I think it is REALLY URGENT that a general fix get out there for all Ubuntu users. I (and everyone else) am wildly promoting 8.04 as the Vista alternative... and it strikes me as plain silly to not fix this problem pronto. It is so off-putting to use an OS that cannot keep file dates correct..