Public bug reported:
There's an issue where pen gets stuck in a loop and does nothing useful
at all, it's been fixed in 0.32.0-2. Could you please update the package
for xenial.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819981
** Affects: pen (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
(initramfs) dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/sda
pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0
(initramfs) dmraid -s -cr /dev/sda
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1" [1/2] on /dev/sdd
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1" [1/2] on /dev/sdc
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_
And yes, unfortunately I'm dualbooting Windows Server for other
experiments.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955
Title:
(fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
To manage
** Also affects: dmraid
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955
Title:
(fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
To manage notificat
I think I've traced it down to a problem with the logic in dmraid-
activate
Raid_Name=$(dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/$Node_Name | grep -vi "No RAID disks" | grep
-vi "formats discovered")
activate_array "$Raid_Name"
Here it tries to activate a subset of a raid10. (pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0,
pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1) wh
(initramfs) dmraid -s -si
*** Superset
name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb
size: 1953124864
stride: 128
type: raid10
status: ok
subsets: 2
devs: 4
spares: 0
--> Subset
name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0
size: 1953124864
stride: 128
type: stripe
status: ok
subsets: 0
devs: 2
spares: 0
--> Subset
name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1
size: 1
(initramfs) dmraid-activate sda
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1" [1/2] on /dev/sdd
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1" [1/2] on /dev/sdc
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0" [1/2] on /dev/sdb
ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874
Title:
(fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
To manage notif
Public bug reported:
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer
from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images
/quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to
drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation.
(initramfs) blkid
(initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d]
/dev/sda: TYPE="promise_fasttrack_raid_member" USAGE="raid"
/dev/sdb: TYPE="promise_fasttrack_raid_member" USAGE="raid"
/dev/sdc: TYPE="promise_fasttrack_raid_member" USAGE="raid"
/dev/sdd: TYPE="promise_fasttrack_raid_member" USAGE="raid"
Withou
(initramfs) dmraid -ay
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0" was activated
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1" was activated
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb" was activated
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb1" was activated
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb2" was activated
RAID set "pdc_ebdeeaiceb3" was activated
--
You received this bug no
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer
from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images
/quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to
drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation.
After the install, I
2. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1
3. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1.1
4. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu5 (works!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513
Title:
network with bonding does no
I just completed my second round of testing, all with a separate /var
partition;
Tested:
1. netboot install of precise.
Could not install, problems installing linux-generic package at end of
installation. (also tried linux-server, and linux-image-generic)
Installation is done via ttyS0, so did n
** Also affects: upstart
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513
Title:
network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var
pa
Fun fact: On a fresh install of natty with working bonding
configuration, "do-release-upgrade" renders the system with a separate
/var partition, without working networking once it boots to oneiric.
Oneiric amd64, 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP
ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1.
--
You received thi
Works on Natty amd64 2.6.38-13-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP
with ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-15ubuntu2.11.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513
Title:
network with bonding does not start on ub
This was tested on Oneiric amd64 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP
and oneiric-proposed 3.0.0-15-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513
Title:
network with bondin
Public bug reported:
I believe there are benefits of having a separate /var partition,
unfortunately having bonding-configured network start up with the OS is
not one of them. Or atleast not in a timely fashion.
I've done this experiment on two identical hp bl460c g1 blades, only
difference was t
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713805
Title:
: 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
Downloaded opera 11.01 package.
db-click to install.
type administrative password for installation.
crash.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic
Ok, so this is probably my own fault. But it says BUG, so I'll report it
anyway.
[12276.094371] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [udevd:17459]
[12276.094376] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_emc fbcon tileblit font bitblit
Will a newer version end up in backports, or is the quick fix getting it
from maverick?
--
libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to
create domain with virt-manager using network bridge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520386
You received this bug notification
Can't netboot with "Atheros AR8132 / L1c Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev
c0)" either on Asus 1001 HA.
--
Installation detects neither wired Attansic interface nor wireless Broadcom
interface
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566673
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Attachment added: "Corrupting image."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076603/COLONY.PIK.tga
--
Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520717
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I first noticed nautilus dissapearing when opening a folder containing that
image.
Then I noticed eog crashing when trying to open/view the image.
** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: eog gdkp
You'll have to excuse all the crap irrelevant text that came with the
apport-bug report, I didn't immediately spot a way to file a bug without
using "ubuntu-bug". And it apparently wouldn't take the core file as a
parameter. The assertion in the summary gives a a great hint as to
what's wrong. Just
** Attachment added: "Image that fails assertion."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076112/COLONY.PIK.tga
--
(eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx->cmap_size > 0'
failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076083/Dependencies.txt
--
(eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx->cmap_size > 0'
failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: eog
This is probably due to a library eog uses. This will also prevents
certain configurations* of nautilus (*those with thumbnailing) from
accessing the folder where such an image is contained. Nautilus will
also crash/assert/segfault when attempting to
The 20080306 i386 build is broken. Having same issues here. Try a newer
version, 20080311 is out.
--
hard disk not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201049
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Is this during the ubuntu-installer, or on an installed system? And
which version of Linux kernel is running?
(I have the 6145 controller aswell, doesn't work during the install, but
works on an installed system with the 2.6.24 kernel.)
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/196
Related bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/139234
same type of marvell sata 6145 controller.
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Description changed:
1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy
2) netboot.tar.gz ?
3) 2008.02.26
- 4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install.
5)
- 1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will
detect the disks.
- The other 19 times, they are n
uname -a
Linux mj 2.6.24-11-generic #1 SMP Fri Feb 29 22:08:31 UTC 2008 i686 unknown
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
** Attachment added: "seriously broken installer (lspci)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544015/lspci.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
** Attachment added: "seriously broken installer (lsmod)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544007/lsmod.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Using the files {linux,initrd.gz}, dated 2008.03.04, from
ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/i386/
None of my disks show up.
I don't have a cd-rom, so i'm not able to test normal/alternate cd-
releases. It needs to be done via pxe.
** Attachment added: "installed system dmesg (working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264275/mj-dmesg.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Public bug reported:
1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy
2) netboot.tar.gz ?
3) 2008.02.26
4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install.
5)
1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will
detect the disks.
The other 19 times, they are not detected.
So I've act
** Attachment added: "installed system lspci (working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264282/mj-lspci.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Attachment added: "installed system lsmod (working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264277/mj-lsmod.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Attachment added: "installer lspci (not working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264297/installer-lspci.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "installer lsmod (not working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264295/installer-lsmod.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: "installer dmesg (not working)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264294/installer-dmesg.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
taken directly from config-2.6.22-generic
# CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set
Which explains why the module was not present in my custom kernel
either. Once I compiled it, I got sound.
--
[gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller
(which working fine in feisty
Here's my output, using libata-dev kernel compiled with
config-2.6.22-12-generic options. (I too have no sound, but snd-hda-intel is
not in modules.)
Linux mj 2.6.23-rc8 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 02:21:06 CEST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High
** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
dmraid45 target please
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-base
Someone decided that it would be funny to have a package in
base to depend on openoffice-writer.
So after a netboot installation. I've got your basic commandline linux,
with no xserver, no windowmanager, yet somehow openoffice-writer found
it
Yep. This wasn't an issue in dapper with the older g-p-m. It's all
g-p-m's fault. g-p-m sees both my batteries, and calculates the total
time and total charge, but shuts down on one empty battery.
--
Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not
recognises second batte
Public bug reported:
I'm sitting, listening to music, wearing earbuds. Suddenly a system beep
comes along. BEEP! It apparently does not care about my volume settings.
I should sue someone for temporary and possibly permanent hearing loss.
On a slightly more serious note though; Come on... It's an
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager
Have two fully charged batteries on your laptop. Let the expansion
battery on your laptop run out of power. Watch your laptop power down
with still 50% charge left.
Ubuntu Edgy: IBM Thinkpad X40.
** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubun
52 matches
Mail list logo
