[Bug 619754] Re: alt + backspace; alt+d etc. don't work anymore

2010-10-13 Thread ChosenOne
Still affected in upstream :( Too bad it didn't make it into maverick. Any chance of going for upstream soon? -- alt + backspace; alt+d etc. don't work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 37288] Re: Bluetooth not discovered on Dell Inspiron 9400

2010-03-14 Thread ChosenOne
This affects me on a Dell Inspiron 13z. I will try to test/debug if this exists in current Alpha3, but I am not sure how to test this thoroughly. Any hints? -- Bluetooth not discovered on Dell Inspiron 9400 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37288 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-28 Thread ChosenOne
Sorry, I forgot where my Firefox version is coming from. I am using the "ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable" ppa-repository. -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522727 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-28 Thread ChosenOne
Okay, it is the following (background: I activated that I'm being asked before accepting any cookies) No chrome package registered for chrome://cookie/content/cookieAcceptDialog.xul -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens https://b

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-27 Thread ChosenOne
The bug appears to be profile-bound. Using a new profile, will not trigger the bug, although safe-mode will. -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522727 You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-27 Thread ChosenOne
uh, sorry. I use 3.6 from the firefox-3.5 package - should I run apport again? :> -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 522727] XsessionErrors.txt

2010-02-27 Thread ChosenOne
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39852311/XsessionErrors.txt ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Tags added: apport-collected -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after th

[Bug 522727] apport-collect data

2010-02-27 Thread ChosenOne
Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: firefox-3.6 (not installed) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom di

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-27 Thread ChosenOne
Ignoring task https://api.edge.launchpad.net/beta/ubuntu/+source/firefox because it is closed ;) -- tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522727 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 522727] Re: tabs are not clickable sometimes, and firefox-bin needs to be killed when exiting after this happens

2010-02-26 Thread ChosenOne
For a few days now, I'm having the exact same bug - even with addons disabled. I am running Firefox in safe-mode right now, with my tabs still not-clickable. (Firefox 3.6 (not 3.6.2), on amd64, karmic and linux-kernel 2.6.31-19) Kris' steps to reproduce the bug work - although it occurred to me i

[Bug 500153] Re: transmission is using the wrong upnp device for portforwarding

2010-01-03 Thread ChosenOne
The point is: My network is using 172.16.3.1 - a debian box - for routing, internet access etc. But there was also a normal "home router" (at 172.16.3.10) provided by my ISP connected to that debian box to provide wireless access at my home. This "home router" was advertising kinda rogueish, so

[Bug 164793] Re: Logitech MX610 mouse special functions doesn't work

2009-12-25 Thread ChosenOne
"The mouse is a bit strange - it has two logical "interfaces" for the USB receiver/transmitter. They are on the same plug, but they are treated as separate devices by the Linux USB subsystem. The first USB interface is the normal mouse device - it has the X/Y motion, the normal buttons and the

[Bug 164793] Re: Logitech MX610 mouse special functions doesn't work

2009-12-25 Thread ChosenOne
Okay, I did what you suggested Teej, but I am using the left-handed version of MX610 (which should not and does not make a difference): Here's what xev says: left-button: ButtonPress event, serial 33, synthetic NO, window 0x621, state 0x10, button 1, same_screen YES right-button: ButtonP

[Bug 500153] Re: transmission is using the wrong upnp device for portforwarding

2009-12-24 Thread ChosenOne
Thanks Charles :) -- transmission is using the wrong upnp device for portforwarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 500153] Re: transmission is using the wrong upnp device for portforwarding

2009-12-24 Thread ChosenOne
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37158553/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37158554/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37158555/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 500153] [NEW] transmission is using the wrong upnp device for portforwarding

2009-12-24 Thread ChosenOne
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: transmission Transmission gladly reports that it enabled port forwarding via UPnP on 172.16.3.10, but (as it should know!) 172.16.3.10 is *not* my gateway and not responsible for any port-forwarding regarding my internet connection. A simple "route -n"

[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2009-12-01 Thread ChosenOne
So here's the dilemma: Either we enable it by default (like Windows 7 does, btw!) and take a few risks (networks are harder to debug, difficulties with applications, etc.) or we disable it and lessen privacy for end-users. I'd prefer the second option, but only if we had a way of disabling it *

[Bug 240147] Re: conntrack error prevents cutter from working

2009-11-27 Thread ChosenOne
this is in progress for far too long.. what's wrong? -- conntrack error prevents cutter from working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub

[Bug 258803] Re: Current version is obsolete

2009-01-27 Thread ChosenOne
I agree with the previous posts. @ Jérémy Subtil: Who is to decide between SRU and backport? Is there a way to speed things up? :) Thanks. -- Current version is obsolete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 240147] [NEW] conntrack error prevents cutter from working

2008-06-15 Thread ChosenOne
re it is a compatibility problem worth fixing. Console output of cutter: $ cutter usage: cutter ip [ port [ ip [ port ] ] ] $ sudo cutter 172.16.3.104 openning /proc/net/ip_conntrack: No such file or directory Best regards, Frederik "ChosenOne" Braun P.S.: It is stated in the man page,

Re: [Bug 229304] Re: upgrade from dapper to hardy fails

2008-05-19 Thread ChosenOne
Hello, I'll directly start: ~# ls -l /usr/lib/libcups* ls: cannot access /usr/lib/libcups.so.2: No such file or directory Note the "cannot access". Also. see this result: :~# ls -al /usr/lib/ ls: cannot access /usr/lib/libcups.so.2: No such file or directory ?? ? ?? ?

[Bug 229304] Re: upgrade from dapper to hardy fails

2008-05-11 Thread ChosenOne
** Attachment added: "tarball of log files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14452613/update.tar -- upgrade from dapper to hardy fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 229304] [NEW] upgrade from dapper to hardy fails

2008-05-11 Thread ChosenOne
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Upgrade during the upgrade-process and after having successfully upgraded a few packages. Details as follow: Could not install the upgrades The upgrade aborts now. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg