[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2025-01-13 Thread Chengen Du
** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054390 Title: Refine proc mounts entries traversal To manage notific

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2025-01-12 Thread Chengen Du
Hi Heitor, As referenced in the corresponding bug report [1], the ZFS-related logic should ideally be backported to Focal. However, the reason for not doing so remains unclear. Since the issue is unrelated to the reported bug, addressing it as part of this fix might not be appropriate. [1] http

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2025-01-12 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] The shell's read builtin iterates through /proc/mounts one line at a time. This becomes problematic when LDAP automount maps generate a large number of entries in /proc/mounts. It can lead to timeout issues, especially when iterating through the entries twic

[Bug 2078659] Re: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work

2025-01-05 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] io_commit_cqring() writes the CQ ring tail to make it visible and also triggers any deferred work. When a ring is set up with IOPOLL, it doesn't require locking around the CQ ring updates. However, if there is deferred work that needs processing, io_queue

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-12-26 Thread Chengen Du
@enr0n It seems that none of the regressions are related to this patch. Would it be possible to retrigger the autopkgtest? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209 Title: PTP device sym

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-12-16 Thread Chengen Du
The -proposed version in Jammy has been thoroughly tested and confirmed to function without any issues. [Jammy] root@ptp-jammy:~# apt policy udev udev: Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.14 Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.14 Version table: *** 249.11-0ubuntu3.14 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-11-20 Thread Chengen Du
Hi Mauricio, Thank you for the update. The test plan has been revised accordingly. ** Description changed: [Impact] The shell's read builtin iterates through /proc/mounts one line at a time. This becomes problematic when LDAP automount maps generate a large number of entries in /proc/mount

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-11-17 Thread Chengen Du
Both -proposed versions in Jammy and Noble have been tested and confirmed to work without any issues. [Jammy] root@jammy-ptp:~# apt policy udev udev: Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.13 Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.13 Version table: *** 249.11-0ubuntu3.13 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/u

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-11-13 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp2054390-noble-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5837060/+files/lp2054390-noble-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff -- You r

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-11-13 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2054390-jammy-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5837059/+files/lp2054390-jammy-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff -- You r

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-11-13 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Focal ** Patch removed: "lp2054390_focal_refine_proc_mounts_entries_traversal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5747548/+files/lp2054390_focal_refine_proc_mounts_entries_traversal.debdiff ** Patch removed: "lp2054390_jammy_refin

[Bug 2078659] Re: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work

2024-11-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] io_commit_cqring() writes the CQ ring tail to make it visible and also triggers any deferred work. When a ring is set up with IOPOLL, it doesn't require locking around the CQ ring updates. However, if there is deferred work that needs processing, io_queue

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-10-13 Thread Chengen Du
tream has a patch to fix this issue. commit 6bd12be3fa7761f190e17efdbdbff4440da7528b Author: Chengen Du CommitDate: Thu Aug 15 15:38:46 2024 +0900 - udev: Handle PTP device symlink properly on udev action 'change' + udev: Handle PTP device symlink properly on ude

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-25 Thread Chengen Du
A quick status update: we're currently waiting for the upstream backport work to be completed. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59621 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59620 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/59619 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-13 Thread Chengen Du
Kindly provide an update on this bug if there are any developments in progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078906 Title: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_ino

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-09-12 Thread Chengen Du
The issue is present in Bionic, but it will only be addressed in Ubuntu Pro. ** Also affects: ubuntu-pro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-pro/18.04 Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-09-12 Thread Chengen Du
** Also affects: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) -- You received this bug n

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-09-06 Thread Chengen Du
The proposed version in Jammy has been successfully verified according to the test plan. [amd64/generic] root@dixie:~# uname -a Linux dixie 5.15.0-119-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 2 19:25:20 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@dixie:~# lsb_release -sc jammy root@dixie:~# apt policy op

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-09-06 Thread Chengen Du
The proposed version in Noble has been successfully verified according to the test plan. [amd64/generic] root@dixie:~# uname -a Linux dixie 6.8.0-41-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Aug 2 20:41:06 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@dixie:~# lsb_release -sc No LSB modules are

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-09-04 Thread Chengen Du
I have tested both ussuri-proposed and yoga-proposed according to the test plan, and the results are as expected. root@juju-494255-openstack-focal-7:~# apt policy nova-common nova-common: Installed: 3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.7~cloud0 Candidate: 3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.7~cloud0 Version table: *** 3:25.2.1

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-04 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "lp2078906-ceph-oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2078906/+attachment/5813616/+files/lp2078906-ceph-oracular.debdiff ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-04 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp2078906-ceph-noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2078906/+attachment/5813615/+files/lp2078906-ceph-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-04 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2078906-ceph-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2078906/+attachment/5813614/+files/lp2078906-ceph-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 2078906] Re: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-04 Thread Chengen Du
The problematic code is already wrapped by the lock in Focal, so no fix is needed. ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 2078906] [NEW] Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode

2024-09-03 Thread Chengen Du
commit that fixes this issue: commit 2b78a5b3147d4e97be332ca88d286aec0ce44dc3 Author: Chengen Du Date: Mon Aug 12 18:17:37 2024 +0800 client: Prevent race condition when printing Inode in ll_sync_inode In the ll_sync_inode function, the entire Inode structure is printed without ho

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-09-03 Thread Chengen Du
Hi Mauricio, If I understand correctly, the issue is dependent on the GCC version. I tested it before submitting the patches. On Focal, the issue cannot be reproduced because the GCC version is outdated. root@openafs-focal-arm:~# gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.2) 9.4.0

[Bug 2078659] Re: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work

2024-09-02 Thread Chengen Du
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078659 Title: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work To mana

[Bug 2078659] Re: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work

2024-09-02 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] io_commit_cqring() writes the CQ ring tail to make it visible and also triggers any deferred work. When a ring is set up with IOPOLL, it doesn't require locking around the CQ ring updates. However, if there is deferred work that needs processing, io_queue

[Bug 2078659] Re: Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work

2024-09-02 Thread Chengen Du
** Summary changed: - io_uring: ensure IOPOLL locks around deferred work + Hold IOPOLL locks when triggering io_uring's deferred work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078659 Title: Ho

[Bug 2078659] [NEW] io_uring: ensure IOPOLL locks around deferred work

2024-09-01 Thread Chengen Du
s any issues, it may lead to a deadlock. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chengen Du (chengendu) Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Unde

[Bug 2076398] Re: Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL2

2024-08-29 Thread Chengen Du
I have tested the proposed version on Focal/Jammy and confirmed that the issue is fixed. [Focal] root@focal:~# apt policy libpcap0.8 libpcap0.8: Installed: 1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1 Candidate: 1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1 Version table: *** 1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1 500 500 http://archive.ubunt

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
@mfo Could you please find some time to verify this patch? The patch set is lp2054390-XXX-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time- on.debdiff. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
There are no issues with the patch; it turned out to be a misunderstanding. We are currently awaiting the SE sponsor's review. ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => In Progress ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Incomplete => In Progress ** Ch

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "lp2077929-openafs-oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2077929/+attachment/5809716/+files/lp2077929-openafs-oracular.debdiff ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openaf

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp2077929-openafs-noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2077929/+attachment/5809714/+files/lp2077929-openafs-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
: openafs (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu

[Bug 2077929] Re: Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-08-27 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2077929-openafs-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/2077929/+attachment/5809713/+files/lp2077929-openafs-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077929] [NEW] Failed to insert openafs module on ARM platform: Exec format error

2024-08-26 Thread Chengen Du
Public bug reported: [Impact] The openafs module cannot be installed on the ARM platform, resulting in the following error: insmod /lib/modules/6.5.0-1025-gcp/updates/dkms/openafs.ko modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'openafs': Exec format error [Fix] There is an upstream commit that addresses

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-08-23 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "lp209-systemd-oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/209/+attachment/5808827/+files/lp209-systemd-oracular.debdiff ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: system

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-08-23 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp209-systemd-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/209/+attachment/5808825/+files/lp209-systemd-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-08-23 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp209-systemd-noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/209/+attachment/5808826/+files/lp209-systemd-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077779] Re: PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-08-23 Thread Chengen Du
: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu

[Bug 2077779] [NEW] PTP device symlink missing after running udevadm trigger command

2024-08-23 Thread Chengen Du
rly. [Fix] Upstream has a patch to fix this issue. commit 6bd12be3fa7761f190e17efdbdbff4440da7528b Author: Chengen Du CommitDate: Thu Aug 15 15:38:46 2024 +0900 udev: Handle PTP device symlink properly on udev action 'change' PTP device symlink creation rules are currentl

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-08-19 Thread Chengen Du
I have conducted tests on Focal, Jammy, and Noble. The command functions correctly without forcibly restarting the system. === Focal === root@test-focal:~# apt policy nvme-cli nvme-cli: Installed: 1.9-1ubuntu0.2 Candidate: 1.9-1ubuntu0.2 Version table: *** 1.9-1ubuntu0.2 100 100 /va

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-08-13 Thread Chengen Du
Here is the link to the upstream bug related to the configuration option: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2076891 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969643 Title: RBD: Unable to d

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-08-12 Thread Chengen Du
Hi @hopem, Thanks for your suggestion on this issue. For the proposed upstream patch that adds a configuration to enable RBD flatten operations during delete_volume/delete_snapshot calls, we've currently set the default to false. However, it may be challenging to get upstream approval, especially

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-08-12 Thread Chengen Du
Hi Heitor, I understand that you’re busy with other high-priority tasks. Is there anything I can do to help move this forward? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072381 Title: NVMe show-

[Bug 2076398] Re: Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL2

2024-08-09 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Focal ** Also affects: libpcap (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libpcap (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "lp2076398-libpcap-focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpcap/+bug/2

[Bug 2076398] Re: Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL2

2024-08-09 Thread Chengen Du
The commit has already been integrated into Noble/Oracular. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076398 Title: Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL

[Bug 2076398] Re: Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL2

2024-08-09 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2076398-libpcap-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpcap/+bug/2076398/+attachment/5804033/+files/lp2076398-libpcap-jammy.debdiff ** Changed in: libpcap (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen

[Bug 2076398] [NEW] Tcpdump utility captures incorrect packets on VLAN interface when using SLL2

2024-08-09 Thread Chengen Du
Public bug reported: [Impact] When using the `tcpdump -i any` command with SLL2, bogus packets may be captured. This issue arises due to differing offsets used for inserting VLAN tags across various data link types. [Fix] An upstream commit has been made to address and fix this issue. commit 4b

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-08-04 Thread Chengen Du
The nova package in focal-proposed has been tested according to the [Test Plan]. The test results met our expectations. root@juju-757eba-openstack-focal-7:~# apt policy nova-common nova-common: Installed: 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.13 Candidate: 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.13 Version table: *** 2:21.2.4-0ubunt

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-08-02 Thread Chengen Du
@mfo @slyon I apologize for the indentation issue in the focal patch. I may have inadvertently modified the patches after testing them. The issue originates from nova/tests/functional/db/test_archive.py, where the test_archive_deleted_rows_parent_child_trees_one_at_time function is not indented

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-08-02 Thread Chengen Du
The nova package in jammy-proposed has been tested according to the [Test Plan]. The test results met our expectations. ubuntu@juju-7d3324-openstack-jammy-7:~$ apt policy nova-common nova-common: Installed: 3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.7 Candidate: 3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.7 Version table: *** 3:25.2.1-0ubunt

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-25 Thread Chengen Du
Hi Heitor, I appreciate your help with this fix! Hi Dan, Thank you for your notice. The reason why the f/j/n series diffs are backports is that they don't contain mmio_write32/mmio_write64 related modifications. The mmio_write functions are only used in the `nvme set- reg` command, which is not

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-07-11 Thread Chengen Du
Noble 3:29.0.1-0ubuntu1.3 already contains the patch, so no changes are needed. ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20242

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-07 Thread Chengen Du
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress **

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794977/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794978/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Mantic ** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_mantic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794976/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_mantic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794975/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Focal ** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794974/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794969/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794970/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** C

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794972/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 2072381] Re: NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Patch added: "lp2072381_nvme-cli_mantic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/2072381/+attachment/5794971/+files/lp2072381_nvme-cli_mantic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 2072381] [NEW] NVMe show-regs command forcibly reboots ARM-based VM

2024-07-05 Thread Chengen Du
Public bug reported: [Impact] The ARM-based VM will reboot after executing the 'nvme show-regs' command. [Fix] There is an upstream commit that fixed this issue: commit fa5a46cc25b884a61a14f06e6693373bcefff29d Author: Oliver Upton Date: Thu Jul 4 19:59:26 2024 +0200 common.h: Avoid usi

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-07-03 Thread Chengen Du
@mfo I apologize for the haste earlier and have now modified the test plan. ** Description changed: [Impact] Deleting a volume will fail if it has snapshot or volume children, resulting in an ImageBusy error. [Fix] Upstream has a patch that uses RBD flatten operations to break depende

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-07-02 Thread Chengen Du
@mfo I have introduced a configuration option, 'enable_flatten_children_deletion', to enable RBD flatten operations during delete_volume/delete_snapshot calls (default is False). Please take a look and proceed with the SRU process. Thanks for your continued support. ** Patch added: "lp1969643-cind

[Bug 1969643] Re: RBD: Unable to delete a volume which has snapshot/volume children

2024-05-30 Thread Chengen Du
* Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-05-28 Thread Chengen Du
(Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-05-28 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Focal ** Description changed: - Observed downstream in a large scale cluster with constant create/delete - server activity and hundreds of thousands of deleted instances rows. + [Impact] + Originally, Nova archives deleted rows in batches consisting of a maximum number of parent rows

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-05-28 Thread Chengen Du
** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-05-10 Thread Chengen Du
I have followed the test plan to test the proposed package on Jammy and Mantic. The result meets the expectation. root@deductive-oilbird:/var/crash# apt policy crash crash: Installed: 8.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 8.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 8.0.2-1ubuntu1.1 100 100 http://arc

[Bug 2064201] Re: Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-05-06 Thread Chengen Du
@sergiodj Apologies for the oversight in not providing a detailed test plan earlier. I've now updated it. Thank you for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064201 Title: Use De

[Bug 2064201] Re: Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-05-06 Thread Chengen Du
I have followed the test plan and confirmed that the issue won't be occurred in 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4. root@focal:/# apt policy multipath-tools multipath-tools: Installed: 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4 Candidate: 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4 Version table: *** 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/u

[Bug 2064201] Re: Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-05-06 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] The issue arises from the installation of the udev rules file /lib/udev/rules.d/68-del-part-nodes.rules by kpartx. This file references /usr/sbin/partx, but on Debian, partx is located in /usr/bin. This incorrect path leads to the following error: syste

[Bug 2064201] Re: Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-04-30 Thread Chengen Du
unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chengen Du (chengendu) ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New =>

[Bug 2064201] Re: Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-04-30 Thread Chengen Du
debdiff for Bionic ** Patch added: "lp2064201-multipath-tools-bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064201/+attachment/5772882/+files/lp2064201-multipath-tools-bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 2064201] [NEW] Use Debian-specific partx path in kpartx rule

2024-04-30 Thread Chengen Du
Public bug reported: [Impact] The issue arises from the installation of the udev rules file /lib/udev/rules.d/68-del-part-nodes.rules by kpartx. This file references /usr/sbin/partx, but on Debian, partx is located in /usr/bin. This incorrect path leads to the following error: systemd-udevd[3302

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-15 Thread Chengen Du
Following the discussion with the SRU sponsor (i.e., @mfo/@halves), the SRU will be put on hold until the Noble release. The patch is not considered critical for the release, as it focuses on optimization rather than bug fixes. It would be advantageous to opt for a safer approach, allowing for addi

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] - When LDAP automount maps generate a substantial number of entries in /proc/mounts, it has the potential to induce a timeout issue, particularly during the process of iterating through the entries twice in the cryptroot hook. + The shell's read builtin iterate

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "lp2054390-noble-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5761411/+files/lp2054390-noble-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff ** Change

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
Upstream has merged the patch [1]. I have backported the new patch for SRU. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup- team/cryptsetup/-/merge_requests/36 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Mantic ** Patch added: "lp2054390-mantic-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5761410/+files/lp2054390-mantic-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff -- Yo

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "lp2054390-jammy-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5761409/+files/lp2054390-jammy-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff -- You r

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-04-03 Thread Chengen Du
Debdiff for Focal ** Patch added: "lp2054390-focal-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2054390/+attachment/5761407/+files/lp2054390-focal-d-functions-get_mnt_devno-Speed-up-execution-time-on.debdiff -- You r

[Bug 2032164] Re: A general-proteciton exception during guest migration to unsupported PKRU machine

2024-03-26 Thread Chengen Du
Mantic has already included this two commits in #2049202 [1]. c95b65ba744d x86/fpu: Allow caller to constrain xfeatures when copying to uabi buffer 97cdceb46fb3 KVM: x86: Constrain guest-supported xfeatures only at KVM_GET_XSAVE{2} [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049202 -- You receive

[Bug 2032164] Re: A general-proteciton exception during guest migration to unsupported PKRU machine

2024-03-15 Thread Chengen Du
We have backported the following two patches in Jammy and waiting for review: 18164f66e6c5 x86/fpu: Allow caller to constrain xfeatures when copying to uabi buffer 8647c52e9504 KVM: x86: Constrain guest-supported xfeatures only at KVM_GET_XSAVE{2} The fix will also apply to Focal-

[Bug 2032164] Re: A general-proteciton exception during guest migration to unsupported PKRU machine

2024-03-15 Thread Chengen Du
** Description changed: [Impact] When a host that supports PKRU initiates a guest that lacks PKRU support, the flag is enabled on the guest's fpstate. This information is then passed to userspace through the vcpu ioctl KVM_GET_XSAVE. However, a problem arises when the user opts to migrat

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-02-26 Thread Chengen Du
There is some feedback from upstream regarding this implementation [1]. Before proceeding with the SRU process, I will reach out to them to confirm that the patch won't introduce any regressions. I'll keep the bug updated with their response. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup- team/cryptsetu