[Bug 1972159] Re: systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-27 Thread ChM
Problem definitely disappeared once I upgraded memory to 40GB. But memory usage displayed in top never exceed 6GB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972159 Title: systemd-oomd frequentl

[Bug 1972159] Re: systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-11 Thread ChM
I have upgraded my computer to 40GB of memory and restarted systemd- oomd. Memory usage is stable. No memory leak to report. I can make further test if needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1972159] Re: systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-09 Thread ChM
The free -h information was collected by me after my firefox and visual studio code were killed. The values in the log report were generated by systemd-oomd when it killed the apps I assume. I disabled it, I thus can't contribute any further. sorry. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1972159] Re: systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-09 Thread ChM
$ LANG=en free -h totalusedfree shared buff/cache available Mem: 7.7Gi 3.3Gi 2.1Gi 113Mi 2.2Gi 4.0Gi Swap: 2.0Gi 1.1Gi 941Mi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1972159] Re: systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-09 Thread ChM
$ free -h total utilisé libre partagé tamp/cache disponible Mem: 7,7Gi 3,3Gi 2,2Gi 113Mi 2,2Gi 4,0Gi Partition d'échange: 2,0Gi 1,1Gi 936Mi Syslog: May 9 09:55:32 xxx systemd[2839]: snap.firefox.firefox.b

[Bug 1972159] [NEW] systemd-oomd frequently kills firefox and visual studio code

2022-05-09 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: Since I installed Ubuntu 22.04, firefox and visual studio code are frequently killed by systemd-oomd (every 2hours). I have 8 GB memory and never experienced this before the upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04. I thus assume that the claim that there is not enough memory is abusive. Did

[Bug 1540819] [NEW] systemd-logind on Ubuntu 15.10 crashed with SIGSEGV at login after reboot

2016-02-02 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: After a reboot the systemd-logind process crashed with SIGSEGV. No stack trace available. Here is the top of the crash report: ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 2 09:00:02 2016 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 ExecutablePath: /lib/systemd/systemd-logind Execu

[Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2016-01-26 Thread ChM
Hello, the problem is solved for me by using the proposed version of unattended-upgrades. Thank you Brian for the detailed explanation for installing proposed packages. >From my point of you, the package is ready for release. Thank you Michael. -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2016-01-18 Thread ChM
The reported error is fixed by changing the line 814 In file /usr/bin /unattended-upgrade subject = _("unattended-upgrades result for '%s': '%s'") % ( host(), res) into subject = _("unattended-upgrades result for '{}': '{}'").format( host(), res) Unfortun

[Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2016-01-14 Thread ChM
Unfortunately, the suggested fix doesn't work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527106 Title: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go t

[Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2016-01-13 Thread ChM
The problem only shows up when the following line has been uncommented in the file /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades Unattended-Upgrade::Mail "root"; -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2016-01-13 Thread ChM
The problem is still not solved. I could fix the problem with the following change to the code. In file /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade at line 814 I changed subject = _("unattended-upgrades result for '%s': '%s'") % ( host(), res) into tmp = _("unattended-upgrades resu

Re: [Bug 1527106] Re: Fatal exception failure of unattended-upgrade

2015-12-18 Thread ChM
Le 18/12/2015 09:40, Michael Vogt a écrit : > Thanks for your bugreport > > Could you please attach the output of the commands: > $ locale > $ sudo -i locale > $ apt list -a unattended-upgrades > ? > > Thanks, > Michael > > ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) > Status: Confirmed =

Re: [Bug 378228] Re: eclipse looses focus when tool tip windows disappear

2009-10-15 Thread ChM
Niels Thykier a écrit : > Hi > > Is this still a problem in eclipse 3.5.1-0ubuntu3 from the Ubuntu (9.10) > archives? Please note that you may have to remove your ~/.eclipse for > all of the changes to apply (eclipse tends to cache quite a lot in > ~/.eclipse). > > ~Niels > > > ** Changed in: eclip

Re: [Bug 293001] Re: SCIM disturbs keyboard focus

2009-07-21 Thread ChM
Rolf Leggewie a écrit : > Is this merely a configuration issue? > > I'm not sure. I solved it by installing a missing package which was not signales as missing when (re)installing SCIM. I now have no problems to handle compose characters properly, but I do saw a SCIM zombie process after that

[Bug 243399] Re: SCIM eats X11 KeyRelease event

2009-06-04 Thread ChM
I encounter a problem apparently due to SCIM which has the effect that the keybord focus is apparently loss. I'm using Ubuntu 8.04 and have to stay with it. In Eclipse, when a tooltip windows shows up and disapear, keybpard entry are ignore afterward. I have to switch edited text (clicking tabs) t

[Bug 378228] Re: eclipse looses focus when tool tip windows disappear

2009-06-04 Thread ChM
Problem is apparently related to the SCIM application. I saw a similar problem when switching from gedit to a shell window. The SCIM rectangle pops up on the bottom right side of the screen each time I switch windows. If I select SCIM option to not show this window, when switching from gedit to sh

[Bug 378228] [NEW] eclipse looses focus when tool tip windows disappear

2009-05-19 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse When editing code with eclipse 3.4.2 (Build: M20090211-1700) and java 1.6.0_14-ea-b06 (java HotSpot 64bit server 14.0-b15) and a tool tip shows up to give information on an error (yellow underlined), the keyboard focus is not returned to the sourc

[Bug 250990] Re: Java keyboard layout problem

2009-02-18 Thread ChM
Problem solved ! There an error in the configuration of SCIM. Note: the problem showed up with JEdit and with ImageJ. In the file /etc/scim/global there is a line /SupportedUnicodeLocales = en_US.UTF-8 to which I simply added support for my local keyboard. /SupportedUnicodeLocales = en_US.UT

[Bug 250990] Re: Java keyboard layout problem

2009-02-17 Thread ChM
It didn't solved the problem. Though I noticed that if I run the java program as root, it does pick the right keyboard. That was the reason I thought changing /etc/environment worked. -- Java keyboard layout problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250990 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 250990] Re: Java keyboard layout problem

2009-02-17 Thread ChM
Same problem here and I would qualify it as serious ! In my configuration the /etc/environment has the utf8 suffixe in uppercase. Though Java doesn't recognize the French keyboard layout. In /etc/environment I have LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 If I switch it to lowercase java recognizes the franch keyboar

[Bug 176213] Re: eth0 init failed because dhcbdb not running

2007-12-17 Thread ChM
Changing dhcbdb daemon startup order solved the amavis-clamav-spamassassin problem. It changed it to rc2.d/S24dhcbdb. I have another ubuntu computer but it doesn't use dhcp, so no problem. It also has rc2.d/S24dhcbdb -- eth0 init failed because dhcbdb not running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 176213] Re: eth0 init failed because dhcbdb not running

2007-12-17 Thread ChM
Oops, I ment I changed from rc2.d/S24dhcbdb. to rc2.d/S14dhcbdb. dhcbdb is started just before ssh -- eth0 init failed because dhcbdb not running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 176213] eth0 init failed because dhcbdb not running

2007-12-13 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: Since I upgrade to gutsy I see these messages in syslog in a boot phase: Dec 13 20:57:09 home NetworkManager: SWITCH: no current connection, found better connection 'eth0'. Dec 13 20:57:09 home NetworkManager: nm_dhcp_manager_get_state_for_device(): dhcdbd not running!

Re: [Bug 76841] Re: edgy i386 iso cd check fails: 1 checksum error

2007-06-12 Thread ChM
Hello, no this is not an issue anymore. You can close the bug ticket. Brian Murray a écrit : > Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu > better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any > activity in it recently. We were wondering is this stil

Re: [Bug 76842] Re: Install of fam package removes ubuntu-desktop

2007-02-14 Thread ChM
Daniel Holbach a écrit : > Can you explain why fam is more efficient than gamin? > > ** Changed in: gamin (Ubuntu) >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > > Sorry I don't know to whom this question is addressed. The problem I am facing is that I want to install clamav and spamassassin with

[Bug 76842] Install of fam package removes ubuntu-desktop

2006-12-22 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: fam I need to install fam because it makes courier-imapd more efficient in shared access, and it is apparently also usefull for amavisd-new, clamav and spamassassin. fam requires to remove ubuntu-desktop which caught me by surprise and was un unpleasant

[Bug 76841] edgy i386 iso cd check fails: 1 checksum error

2006-12-22 Thread ChM
Public bug reported: I downloaded the iso from four different sources in France. I checked the md5 published on the ubuntu site and it was always Ok. I burned the CD with two different CD writers on two different PC with two different programs. First time at x24, second time at x4 and last time a