[Bug 1874453] Re: ubuntu/focal64 very slow to boot and reboots once

2020-06-30 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I just tried firing up 20200629.0.0 and it has the same issue. I'm also not able to terminate the VMs at all. I've waiting 10+ minutes for them to stop and nothing. I eventually just killed the PIDs for everything VirtualBox related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 203295] Re: upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel

2009-10-13 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I haven't done the same upgrade on those versions, so I can't tell you. I would assume that if the upgrade is working for anyone it is fixed. -- upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203295 You received this bug notification because y

Re: [Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances

2009-10-07 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I replied to your thread post. I don't think a source build is a good idea. Check out my reply and we can continue discussions from there. I'll also work on the Google code project for the entire thing at some point this week. -bp On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:38 AM, born2chill wrote: > hi, > > as

[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances

2009-10-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I was using the same method for my init scripts via symlinks and I changed it to a real file because I found myself tweaking the scripts quite a bit and modifying the parameters and options for each instance. This could still be done by sourcing additional scripts for each instance, but that's some

[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances

2009-10-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
David, Great suggestions. I've actually abandoned the Tomcat 5.5 project and I've also stopped using all of the Tomcat packages in the repositories. The Tomcat packages in the repository are completely invalid. If you download Tomcat from Apache and compare it to the Tomcat from the repository pac

[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances

2008-09-10 Thread Brian Pontarelli
You can check them out from my Google code project here: svn checkout http://debian-tomcat-scripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ debian-tomcat-scripts-read-only Or visit the project page at: http://code.google.com/p/debian-tomcat-scripts -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances

2008-09-09 Thread Brian Pontarelli
This sorta covers the case, but not entirely. This creates instances for developers. My scripts and solution create multiple instances on servers. Often companies run multiple instances of Tomcat on a server to scale things up and also run different webapps on a single server in separate Tomcat ins

[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Rebooted, nothing. Removed all compiz packages and reboot and now everything is back to normal. Compiz is definitely not ready for this release quite yet. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 216043] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
This bug might be related. I opened it today because compiz.real was crashing as well as consuming 100% CPU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/218721 -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216043 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Some more investigation... If I turn off visual effects and log out and back in, compiz.real is still eating up 100% CPU. I'm going to try rebooting, but this is pretty bad. Luckily I have 2 CPUs so I'm not totally out of commission. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
This is getting worse. Compiz is now consuming 100% CPU all of the time and my system is getting hammered. Can someone please review this bug and advise. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Nevermind, realized that this version of launchpad allows me to edit the title and description. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Copmiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Oops. Can someone please fix my typo on the title. This should be compiz not copmiz. It will make this bug impossible to search. I'll wait for a few minutes to see if someone fixes it, otherwise I will open another bug with the correct title. ** Summary changed: - [Hardy] Copmiz crashing system +

[Bug 218721] [NEW] [Hardy] Compiz crashing system

2008-04-17 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz After updating to the latest compiz, I figured this bug would be fixed, but it is not. Here's the issue: When Thunderbird or some other application pops up a dialog, usually from another virtual desktop onto the current virtual desktop, Compiz spi

[Bug 185854] Re: Setting static IP in Network Settings doesn't produce correct data

2008-04-06 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Here's the upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526137 -- Setting static IP in Network Settings doesn't produce correct data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts

2008-04-03 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I tried the layout tweak with "Super is mapped to the Win-keys" and it doesn't work for me. The keyboard-shortcuts application then interprets the Win-key as Mod4 and will allow me to set things to something like "Mod4+P", but the rest of Gnome doesn't see the key event once set. I don't have anyth

[Bug 211066] Re: [2.6.24-14] Cannot upgrade linux-restricted-modules-generic

2008-04-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Still not working. Did an update and tried to run the partial-upgrade again with the same message. -- [2.6.24-14] Cannot upgrade linux-restricted-modules-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 211134] Re: [Hardy] update-manager could not update

2008-04-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
** Attachment added: "Apt log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13082437/apt.log -- [Hardy] update-manager could not update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 211134] [NEW] [Hardy] update-manager could not update

2008-04-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager This seems like a new bug in the latest updates. I have around 199 updates available and update-manager says, "Not all updates can be installed. Run a partial upgrade, to install as many updates as possible. ... " Clicking "Partial Upgra

[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode

2008-04-02 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I'm managed to calm the networking stack by rebooting and then taking everything out of roaming mode and placing it into static IP addresses. The reboot was necessary because after these failures occurred the Network Management application kept telling me that I didn't have permissions to change th

[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode

2008-04-01 Thread Brian Pontarelli
As it turns out this bug is slowly becoming a blocker. This is now happening even with roaming mode disabled, using DHCP or static IPs. My network is completely unstable and at random will stop working completely. -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode

2008-03-30 Thread Brian Pontarelli
** Attachment added: "syslog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12979321/syslog -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 209280] [NEW] [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode

2008-03-30 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager I have a single wired connection (eth0) that is set to use roaming mode. NetworkManager starts up fine when I log in but then begins to spin. It is trying to get a DHCP connection over and over. If I change the connection to not use roamin

[Bug 151536] Re: Hangs on login and uses 100% cpu

2008-03-28 Thread Brian Pontarelli
This is still an issue with all updates to Hardy on 3/28/2008. There is also another bug tracking this with much less information. Someone on the Ubuntu team should collapse into a single bug that is still open, active and a high priority and possibly linked upstream. The other bug is 204623: http

[Bug 204623] Re: evolution-data-server-2.22 high cpu utilization

2008-03-28 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Same issue on a dual core dell. Nothing extra installed. Upgrade from Gusty. Don't use evolution. No wireless. I have other issues with networking that are annoying. The nm-applet is constantly spinning and sometimes it takes 10-15 minutes to get a solid DHCP connection. -- evolution-data-server-

[Bug 203295] Re: upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Had the exact same problem. It seems as though Hardy upgrade is selecting the wrong kernel. My guess is that you had a number of kernels installed on your system. I had about 20 or so going back to 2.6.18 days or before. After I upgraded to Hardy my system was only configured (insmod, initramfs, ld

[Bug 207787] [NEW] Multiple tomcat instances

2008-03-27 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat5.5 This is an enhancement. I have written some scripts that change the standard debian/Ubuntu tomcat packages to allow multiple tomcat instances on a single system. They provide the following features: - Setup system to allow multiple instances -

[Bug 173748] Re: Gnome menu items displayed twice

2007-12-04 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I've recently deleted all of my .gconf, .gnome and other configuration directories. I was having a number of issues with Gnome, Metacity and other applications not working correctly and I figured I'd start over and see it things resolve. This computer has been upgraded all the way from 6.x and was

[Bug 173748] Re: Gnome menu items displayed twice

2007-12-03 Thread Brian Pontarelli
** Attachment added: "Image of menu with duplicates" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10712426/Screenshot.png -- Gnome menu items displayed twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu

[Bug 173748] Gnome menu items displayed twice

2007-12-03 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Sometimes the Gnome menu displays all of the menu items twice. This only occurs for items and not sub-menus. See the attached screenshot. The only way I can think to fix it is to log out and then back in. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 88210] Apache2 package requires apache to be running

2007-02-26 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2-common When doing a dist-upgrade from Edgy to Feisty, the package for apache2-common (the old edgy version) required the Apache2 server to be running in order to correctly complete. This should check if Apache is not running, it should just contin

[Bug 47758] Re: Swap partition created incorrectly and swapon always failing

2007-02-08 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Sorry, I wish I could test this, but I'm now on Edgy and have too much going on with this machine or other machines to re-install. I might be able to get to this in a few months, but my guess is that it won't help much. I could also try it with the next release (7.x) if you want. I plan on upgradin