This bug still happens on Ubuntu 10.10 with the 'recommended' Nvidia
blob.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502237
Title:
Xorg crashes after GDM when switching users
To manage notifica
Been happening me, too. When it does, none of the auto-complete drop-
downs appear so I'm guessing it's related? Also, if I simply press
CTRL-N the new window will not have the problem. So it might even be a
FF bug rather than Ubuntu? I'm only seeing it on Ubuntu however
(currently 10.10 64-bit
I can confirm this bug
1) lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
2) apt-cache policy skype
skype:
Installed: 2.1.0.81-1ubuntu5
Candidate: 2.1.0.81-1ubuntu5
Version table:
*** 2.1.0.81-1ubuntu5 0
500 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ lucid/partn
** Also affects: skype
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Cannot maximize other windows over full-screen shared Skype Video
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647301
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
** Also affects: gnome-media via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629137
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
unable to select different alert sounds with sound preferences
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633813
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The bug has been reproducible on my computer, all one needs to do is
click on the sound icon in the system tray in the top right handside of
the Ubuntu GUI then click "sound preferences." From there on the first
tab, there is a sub screen that allows you to change the default alert
sound for Ubuntu
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #629137
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629137
** Also affects: gnome-panel via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629137
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
unable to select different alert sounds with sound preferences
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633813/+attachment/1559267/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633813/+attachment/1559268/+files/GConfNonDefault.txt
--
unable to select different alert
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-panel
Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release: 10.04
gnome-panel:
Installed: 1:2.30.2-0ubuntu0.2
Candidate: 1:2.30.2-0ubuntu0.2
Version table:
*** 1:2.30.2-0ubuntu0.2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-upda
I did some more work on this recently, particularly relating to icon
bounding boxes. I tried to find any bugs by adding code that generated
frames through Cairo, and it seems the bounding boxes are actually
correct, as shown in my screenshot. It seems the actual issues arise in
collision detection
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43386130/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43386131/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43386132/ProcStatus.txt
--
Gnome
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome
Running Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 1 with latest overnight patches circa 4-7-2010
(AMD64 version). When I first login the Mail/Chat icon says "Set up
Chat" and "Set up Mail" on the drop-down, even though everything is
already setup. When i click "Set up Ma
Actually, the realignment approach was what I did with the modified
first iteration of my patch. As you suggest, the code involved for this
is incredibly simple. Also, after investigating the behavior of Windows
XP, a similar method is used there. I do, however, disagree with the
"realign every 2 s
This bug annoyed me too, so I created a patch and discussed it on the
Nautilus mailing list. I have posted the patch at the Nautilus Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601469
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #601469
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601469
--
D
Public bug reported:
This has now happened twice on my 9.04 setup. I'm still not sure what
triggers it, in fact I might be accidentally hitting the F1 key. But it
certainly continued after I confirmed nothing was touching the top of
keyboard so I suspect it might be completely virtual. Either w
This is an ongoing but intermittent problem. I am running 9.04 (32-bit)
and FUSA was working fine until the updates last week. I don't know for
sure that the problem was caused by the particular patches, however, as
it was also the most recent time I've had to reboot (there was a kernel
update la
Sorry but I don't have a test system that I can try to break; I only ran
into this by accident, and was lucky to be able to fix it without any
data-loss.
--
new Partition Editor 'Check' breaks md partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129855
You received this bug notification because you are
Davias,
Thanks for your report! It's good to know it's not a blatant and consistent
problem. For help fixing your md3, however, please post a request on the
Ubuntu forums -- probably the Server Platforms group is best,
http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=339
If you figure-out what spec
I am also experiencing this problem on Jaunty. If there is any decent
load on my network, the connection dies and I'm forced to reconnect
manually. Same error as Rob Finch above .. and also worked fine in
Intrepid.
--
iwl4965: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x200
https://bugs.launch
I updated to 9.04 this morning. I've 2.7ubuntu6 of ia32-libs installed
but receive this error when starting firefox:
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
*** stack smashing detected ***:
/usr/lib
I have this same problem after updating to 9.04 today. When starting
firefox:
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
*** stack smashing detected ***:
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 314879 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314879
Why is this marked as a dupe of bug #314879 when that bug was fixed back
in January and people are still experiencing this with 9.04 'Gold' ?
--
mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade
https:/
There's no 'crash' per se, just the desktop theme get corrupted. Will
the debugger catch that? I thought this bug was Confirmed and stopped
trying to investigate it; I experience it too on my ATI IGP and Ubuntu
8.10.
--
gnome-display-properties changes desktop theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Ah, I get it.
So then my suggestion would be that Ubuntu delete the .Trash folder ONLY when:
1. the OS has created the folder during the same mount session, and
2. the user has emptied the trash, and
3. the user has requested an unmount
Fortunately computers are good at keeping track of 'all' th
Sorry, but I don't understand your explanation. You seem to be saying
that *I* am manually creating this folder? This is not true.
All I know is that I can take a 'clean' flash drive, copy some files
onto it from my Windows machine, then transfer the files to my Ubuntu
machine and delete them fr
FYI - I just received this update today for Intrepid, via Update
Manager. Yeah!
--
[master] tasksel removes all Ubuntu-desktop dependencies without confirmation
dialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150252
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Please don't mark this as Invalid. I'm not saying the folder is
unnecessary whilst the drive is mounted. However, the user does not
expect it to be there and so I am requesting that it be removed
automatically in this specific situation: Where the user has requested
an unmount AND requested empty
FYI - I just submitted bug 362050 to complain about the leftover .Trash
folder.
--
Shouldn't put .Trash-$USER on removable devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Public bug reported:
This is a follow-up to bug 12893 -- it is not a duplicate!
When you go to unmount a USB flash-drive you are automatically prompted
to Empty Trash. After doing so, however, there is a left-over folder,
e.g. ".Trash-1000" which is hidden on Linux but visible on Windows.
Since
Public bug reported:
I tried to do a test install of Ubuntu 9.04 Beta in a VirtualBox 2.2 VM
but it quickly became unusable. I now realize that I didn't allocate
enough disk space (just 2.6 GB) for the disk image, but I never received
any warnings about "out of space".
The initial install went f
this bug was not fixed soon enough to save me just now...
I'm running 8.10 so this apparently hasn't been released yet? and, why is this
marked Urgency:Low, when it can wipe-out your entire installation?
--
[master] tasksel removes all Ubuntu-desktop dependencies without confirmation
dialog
ht
I just tried Mike's suggestion,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/88746/comments/500
re ' /etc/initramfs-tools/modules' and it seems to have fixed my setup?!
(see my bug for my complete setup and test case,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313603 )
I did *not* twea
I just tried the suggestion from here,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/88746/comments/500
basically, to load the USB2 driver before the USB1 (I think...) and it worked!
At least so far, copying files to/from my same 16GB flash-drive are now
full-speed and error
@Theo
So files that are being updated are immediately marked on-disk as zero-byte but
then the actual replacement write is delayed? Doesn't that guarantee data-loss
in the event of a crash? Or, have I massively misunderstood your explanation
for how this is all the fault of those 'crappy' Syste
Still happening for me, as well. Ubuntu 8.10, all updates, ATI
Proprietary Video (from repos), 1680x1050 LCD. When I change the res
from 1680 to 1280x768 (as well as other combinations) the theme or
appearance or something changes to a 'simpler' uglier setting.
Simply logging-off and then back i
Is three years long enough to wait before doing something about this? I
understand it's a Wishlist item now but it's also still a general issue.
Maybe the forthcoming 9.04 can include better error-handling during
install, i.e., fail gracefully (rather than hanging) and bounce the user
back to the
Public bug reported:
I had an existing computer running Ubuntu 8.04.1 without problem. I
downloaded the 8.10 Alternate CD .ISO and burned it to CD-R. I
shutdown, installed a new hard drive, then booted from the CD. I was
able to successfully complete the "Check Media" test. But when I
actually
ok, so I take back what I'd posted previously about 8.04.1 LiveCD
working properly -- it doesn't.
instead, the Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha-3 LiveCD works perfectly! At least for
my SB700 chipset it seems like it'll be fixed on this next release.
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
htt
I did some more testing:
Ubuntu 8.04.1 LiveCD
- immediately mounts my flash drive (and with full-speed) but then errs-out
Ubuntu 9.04 "Alpha3"
- works perfectly
Sorry, I forgot to check the kernel version with each but surely that's
easy to locate? Same with the ehci driver-version (which I'm n
Another affected system:
- Ubuntu 8.10 with current patches
- ATI "740G" motherboard (SB700 chipset, I've attached my lspci printout)
Disabling 'ehci' seems to workaround the problem, and it also seems to
work properly using the Ubuntu 8.04.1 LiveCD, at least for a quick test.
** Attachment added
Public bug reported:
I have an Ubuntu 8.10 box connected on a KVM. If I boot the machine
with another PC selected on the KVM, then Ubuntu will have the wrong
screen-resolution. The easy fix for this is to press CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE
to reset the X server. I have learned, however, that this only wo
I had this problem, too, though on the 32-bit Ubuntu 8.10.
PROCEDURE
- fresh install of 8.10 on RAID-1 pair (ext3)
- reconnect old 8.04.1 drive (one of previous RAID1 pair)
- I don't think I did a 'proper' mount, e.g. from command-line or through
/etc/fstab. Instead, I think I was able to access
Fresh install of Intrepid, mounted old 8.04 hard drive (ext3) and copied
a huge photo collection to the new drive (i.e., via Nautilus) -- ALL
TIME STAMPS RESET. I still have the old drive (w proper time-stamps)
but I've also done a lot of work on the 'new' photo collection so now
I'm stuck, not su
Public bug reported:
I have an existing ATI 740G motherboard with an SB700 chipset. I had no
USB problems under 8.04.1, including the most recent kernel upgrades.
About 3 weeks ago I did a fresh install (and on a new hard-drive) of
8.10. Now I have lots of USB problems! I tried swapping drives
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: transmission
I'm running an up-to-date copy of Ubuntu 8.10 and the included version
of Transmission is v1.3.4. I've been struggling with a download for the
past several days and finally realized that the reported bandwidth usage
was completely wrong. (I
FOLLOW NOTES
- I compared the 'local' script on my 1st (successful) machine and this 2nd
machine; they're identical, same file-date, same lack of 'mdadm' reference. So
that's not the problem here.
- I sat and waited to see if the new "Boot degraded?" prompt appeared; it did
not.
- I tried editi
I've just tried this on my other Ubuntu system and it did not work.
ORIGINAL SETUP
- initially installed with Ubuntu 7.10 with manual fix to initramfs
- two SATA drives in RAID-1 mirror
- confirmed that I could boot from 1 drive
- updated to 8.04.1
- GRUB is still installed to both drives but the
"A RAID admin should understand (or come to understand) this workflow."
Please don't say that. Is there some formal course of study that's
required before implementing sw RAID? No, of course not. Personally, I
am an experienced network manager with decades of experience and various
certs but th
Synaptic is still showing me the same 2 updates ("ppa4"). Should the
version numbers have changed with these latest changes? Also, I'm still
waiting for feedback on my testing and posted questions.
--
SRU: Backport of Boot Degraded RAID functionality from Intrepid to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpa
OK, so the test seemed to go ok (aside from my BIOS trying to boot from
my 'data' drives).
OBSERVATIONS
- As you suggested I ran the update command on just the boot array,
> sudo grub-install /dev/md0
It correctly identified the two physical drives and updated them both
- The initial boot (stil
Dustin,
Thanks for working on back-porting this. (P.S. Congratulations on your
interview in the Ubuntu newsletter!)
I'm trying to test it on my Ubuntu 8.04.1 setup but I'm not sure what's
the appropriate method for updating GRUB. You mention running 'grub-
install' against the RAID device (e.g.
Sorry for the spam, but I just wanted to add my name to the list of
people who have ALWAYS thought this was a problem ( going back to Ubuntu
6.06).
--
Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Nevermind, I had a bad drive. Curiously, it was able to read everything
except for DVD-R data discs, and it 'successfully' burned quite a few of
those, too.
--
mount udf dvd fails, possible wrong fstab entry
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44233
You received this bug notification because you are
Still having this general problem ("wrong fs type, bad option, bad
superblock on /dev/cdrom, missing codepage or other error") on Ubuntu
8.04. I've tried all the fstab options as well as manually tried to
mount the disc using various command-line options. This is with DVD-R
data discs burned/test
didn't a previous poster say that this works fine in the current Debian?
So maybe the place to start is to identify what was changed from the
'base' Debian scripts, and why.
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375
You received this bug notification because y
I think this is a known bug wherein the Alternate CD is not being
mounted as '/media/cdrom'
--
cdromupgrade: command not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222819
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Fixing this in Hardy doesn't help anyone use it to update from Feisty???
Don't we need the fixed Update Manager pushed through the Feisty
repositories?
--
cdromupgrade doesn't work with current hardy alternative CD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155833
You received this bug notification because
none of the suggested config-file changes worked on my Dell Optiplex
GX270 (running Ubuntu 7.10 with generic Intel video driver). Only the
BIOS change from 1MB to 8MB worked.
Is it possible for the Intel driver to detect the potential problem and
then either warn the user or automatically downgra
This bug appears to be fixed in the new Hardy beta! Unfortunately, I'm still
having the same long-term problem with the drives not booting after a drive
failure (and which is already reported by many people in bug 120375),
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/120375
--
unable to complete Soft
Still having this same problem on a new Hardy beta install, using 2
drives in a RAID-1 mirror. Either drive alone will just boot to a
Busybox prompt after a several minute timeout.
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375
You received this bug notification b
Public bug reported:
I'm using the Hardy Alpha-6 Alternate CD to try to install a simple
Software RAID mirror, same as I've done several times before in Ubuntu
7.04, 7.10 (as well as OpenSuSE 10.3). I create the 'physical disk for
raid' partitions but then when I select 'Setup Software RAID' it gi
Can someone please post a simplified how-to for this? I've posted the
following request for help on the forums but no one has responded,
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=716398
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375
You received this bug notificat
Does this setting trigger a Dynamic DNS client? Maybe your system is
hanging because it's trying -- unsuccessfully -- to locate and/or
register with a DDNS server for that Domain Name.
--
Network settings can slowdown Ubuntu 7.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174989
You received this bug notif
63 matches
Mail list logo
