Hi Guys,
Our Blackfin based system was successfully using MT29F2G08AABWP NAND flash
and u-boot.
Recently due to the limited availability we decided to migrate to the new
nand chips from Micron MT29F8G08MAAWC
It uses new technology Multi-Level Cell
However we are still not able to make it workin
Hi Mike,
The patch is working on BR4 Appliance hardware.
Best Regards
Dimitar Penev
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Frysinger"
To:
Cc: "Dimitar Penev"
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 11:25 AM
Subject: [PATCH v2] Blackfin: br4: new board port
From: Dimit
Hi Mike,
The patch is working on the PR1 Appliance hardware.
Best Regards
Dimitar Penev
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Frysinger"
To:
Cc: "Dimitar Penev"
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 11:24 AM
Subject: [PATCH v2] Blackfin: pr1: new board port
From: Dimi
client is folding the patch lines so I dare to post the link to the
patch instead.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Penev
Cc: Mike Frysinger
www.switchfin.org/patches/uBoot-br4-v1.patch
Best Regards
Dimitar Penev
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
Hi Mike,
On Sunday 20 November 2011 15:24:12 Dimitar Penev wrote:
I have noticed however that you have removed the random MAC generation
which I would consider as a good feature.
What is your reasoning behind this?
MAC randomization should not be the default mode for boards. where does
Hi Mike,
Currently we keep the MAC as u-boot variable 'ethaddr' and pass it to
Linux
using the boot comand line.
right, generally all boards use the 'ethaddr' env var. the question is how
does that get initialized ? many boards have dedicated storage so that
even
if the env gets erased,
k you
Dimitar
From 6ff79ef55cb414b0dfb08b8aa9db2baf8849545b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitar Penev
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:05:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Blackfin: br4: new board port
This adds support for the BR4 Appliance. It is a quad channel ISDN BRI
board based on Blackfin BF537 CPU.
Si
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Penev
Cc: Mike Frysinger
www.switchfin.org/patches/uBoot-br4-v1.patch
If you want to submit a patch, then please follow the rules explained
for example here: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches
Most of all, send the patch to the mailing list
transfer in our local network is getting speeded up few times with the
last line added.
It is for the files in the 10 MB size range in case it matters.
Probably you can just mention the expected negative side of this line?
Thank you
Dimitar Penev
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software
Dear Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Dimitar Penev",
In message <003601ccada7$ce75c4b0$2901a8c0@dpn> you wrote:
I will try to fix my mail client and use plain text as it is explained
for
the future.
You don't even need to fix your mail client. Just use "git send-email&qu
Hi Gents,
We have developed a custom blackfin board having two LAN9218 chips on board.
Is the available smc911x driver tested with multiple network chips on board?
The base address of the first chip should be set to CONFIG_SMC911X_BASE.
On what physical address the second chip should be allocate
Hi Guys,
We have developed Blackfin based board using BF547-Rev04.
At the moment we face strange probably hardware issue.
Let me share few details
- GCC assumes rev 0.2 of the CPU is this OK with the rev 0.4 which we have
on board?
- The DDR routing due to a PCB mistake is not perfect now so w
Hello Gents,
My question is not directly applicable with u-boot but I think here I may
find the answer
which I still don't get from the Analog Device forum.
Does anyone got working hardware based on Blackfin BF54x rev 0.4 (the
current silicon revision) and uClinux
http://blackfin.uclinux.org
Hi Mike,
Thank you for this information.
Dimitar
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Frysinger"
To: ; "Dimitar Penev"
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Blackfin BF54x Silicon revision 0.4 and uClinux
__
Hello,
Happy new year to all of you!
We are observing an issue writing some data in the nand flash from uClinux.
Things which I think are relevant are:
-It is custom Blackfin BF547 based system. It uses MT29F4G08ABADAH4 chip
And the interface is thru the built in hardware NAND controller in the
Hello,
First of all sorry if this question was already answered here.
We are sourcing some K9F8G08U0M-PIB0 NAND flash devices.
On the first erase in uboot 2011.09 I got bunch of mostly consecutive bad
blocks.
According to the datasheet we should get not more then 80 bad blocks for our
chip
bu
Hi Scott,
On 01/10/2013 01:56:30 AM, Dimitar Penev wrote:
Hello,
First of all sorry if this question was already answered here.
We are sourcing some K9F8G08U0M-PIB0 NAND flash devices.
On the first erase in uboot 2011.09 I got bunch of mostly consecutive
bad blocks.
According to the
me.
Best Regards
Dimitar
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Wood"
To: "Dimitar Penev"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] NAND flash - bad blocks
On 01/11/2013 02:46:06 AM, Dimitar Penev wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 01/10/2013 01:56:30 AM, Dimitar Pen
-2011.09 from the ADI u-boot git repository
My email client is folding the patch line so I dare to post the link to the
patch instead.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Penev
Cc: Mike Frysinger
www.switchfin.org/patches/uBoot-pr1.patch
Best Regards
Dimitar Penev
rking on PR1
Appliance.
---
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Penev
Cc: Mike Frysinger
www.switchfin.org/patches/uBoot-pr1-v2.patch
Best Regards
Dimitar Penev
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Frysinge
quot;
To: "Dimitar Penev"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add PR1 Appliance - ISDN PRI board
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
21 matches
Mail list logo
