On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 15:20 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Commit v2013.10-189-gb3a7f22 breaks u-boot on the VExpress TC2, since
> the hardcoded value for SP804 timer address is wrong on Versatile
> Express boards using the extended memory map.
> Replace this value with an existing macro make it wo
Ping?
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 15:17 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The main purpose of this is to disable the use of the virtualisation
> extensions
> which Qemu does not emulate.
>
> Also enable a few additional commands and the u-boot API.
>
> This works for me with:
> $ dd if=/dev/zero of=pflash
For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
symbol along with line feed. The problem was introduced in e503f90a
commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Cc: Marek Vasut
---
drivers/serial/lpc32xx_hsuart.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/driver
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
> For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
> symbol along with line feed.
Why ?
> The problem was introduced in e503f90a
> commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy
> Cc: Marek Vasut
> ---
> drivers/serial/lpc32xx_hsuart.c |3 +++
>
Hi Marek,
On 11/30/13 17:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
symbol along with line feed.
Why ?
good question, that's given in experience.
Without CR symbol the output is crumpled:
8<
DRAM: 64 MiB
On 11/30/13 17:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
symbol along with line feed.
Why ?
The problem was introduced in e503f90a
commit.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Cc: Marek Vasut
---
drivers/serial/lpc32
> -Original Message-
> From: FengHua [mailto:feng...@phytium.com.cn]
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 7:05 PM
> To: Bhupesh SHARMA
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; tr...@ti.com; Wood
> Scott-B07421
> Subject: Re: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v15 07/10] arm64: core support
>
>
>
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201311301642.36531.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
>
> > For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
> > symbol along with line feed.
>
> Why ?
Because we are actually emulating a classical type writer here, and to
star
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Michael Trimarchi
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Michael Trimarchi,
>>
>> In message
>> you
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Like I said in the previous reply, we should create a Falcon mode
>>> > target to provide a build wit
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
> On 11/30/13 17:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
> >
> >> For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
> >> symbol along with line feed.
> >
> > Why ?
> >
> >> The problem was introduced in e503f90a
> >> commit.
> >>
> >> Sig
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201311301642.36531.ma...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
> >
> > > For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
> > > symbol along with line feed.
> >
> > Why ?
>
> Because we are actually emulatin
Dear Marek Vasut,
On 12/01/13 01:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
On 11/30/13 17:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Vladimir Zapolskiy,
For LPC32XX high-speed UART it is required to send a carriage return
symbol along with line feed.
Why ?
The problem was introduced in e503f90a
12 matches
Mail list logo
