[U-Boot] I2C register access

2013-03-08 Thread vnr1992
Hi, I have problem in accessing registers of I2C . I am calling my application from u-boot. In my application i can access registers of I2C1 but can't access registers of I2C2. Is there any thing done in u-boot for initializing I2Ci ; i=1,2,3 for accessing registers? -- View this message in co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mx6: use common CPU errata config options

2013-03-08 Thread Stefano Babic
On 07/03/2013 20:19, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/07/2013 10:24 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 26/02/2013 23:28, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> Now that U-Boot has common CONFIG_ options to work around some ARM CPU >>> errata, enable the relevant options on MX6, and remove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 07/31] Define CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD everywhere

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Simon Glass, In message <1362715633-20556-8-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote: > We are introducing a new unified board setup and we want this to > be the default. So we need to opt all architectures out first. ... > +- CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD > + This option should not be defin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] ARM: atmel: add sama5d3xek support

2013-03-08 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Andreas, On 3/8/2013 15:32, Andreas Bießmann wrote: [snip] +void at91_periph_clk_enable(int id) +{ +struct at91_pmc *pmc = (struct at91_pmc *)ATMEL_BASE_PMC; The write protect is meant to be right here? I am sorry, I don't get the right means. Well, this seems to be the first SoC fr

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/t4qds: Slave module for boot from SRIO and PCIE

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
When a T4 board boots from SRIO or PCIE, it needs to finish these processes: 1. Set all the cores in holdoff status. 2. Set the boot location to one PCIE or SRIO interface by RCW. 3. Set a specific TLB entry for the boot process. 4. Set a LAW entry with the TargetID

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/doc: Update the README.srio-pcie-boot-corenet

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
1. Misalignment will be found in the doc/README.srio-pcie-boot-corenet file when the tabs are set to 8 characters. And the standard for u-boot should be 8 character tabs! So this issue should be amended. 2. Add a NOTE for the ENV parameters of the Slave. Signed-off-by: Liu Gang --- doc/RE

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] powerpc/boot: Change the macro of Boot from SRIO and PCIE master module

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
Change the macro "CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_MASTER" to "CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_MASTER", remove them from arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h file, and add those macros in configuration header file of each board which can support the master module of Boot from SRIO and PCIE. Signed-off-by:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] powerpc/b4860qds: Enable master module for boot from SRIO and PCIE

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
B4860QDS can support the feature of Boot from SRIO/PCIE, and the macro "CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_MASTER" will enable the master module of this feature when building the u-boot image. You can get some description about this macro in README file, and for more information about the feature of Boot from

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/b4860qds: Slave module for boot from SRIO and PCIE

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
When a b4860qds board boots from SRIO or PCIE, it needs to finish these processes: 1. Set all the cores in holdoff status. 2. Set the boot location to one PCIE or SRIO interface by RCW. 3. Set a specific TLB entry for the boot process. 4. Set a LAW entry with the Tar

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] powerpc/b4860qds: Add the tlb entries for SRIO interfaces

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
Add the tlb entries based on the configuration of the SRIO interfaces. Every SRIO interface has 256M space: #define CONFIG_SYS_SRIO1_MEM_VIRT 0xa000 #define CONFIG_SYS_SRIO1_MEM_PHYS 0xc2000ull #define CONFIG_SYS_SRIO2_MEM_VIRT 0xb000 #define CONF

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] powerpc/t4qds: Enable master module for Boot from SRIO and PCIE

2013-03-08 Thread Liu Gang
T4 can support the feature of Boot from SRIO/PCIE, and the macro "CONFIG_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT_MASTER" will enable the master module of this feature when building the u-boot image. You can get some description about this macro in README file, and for more information about the feature of Boot from SRIO/P

Re: [U-Boot] Possible GPL violation

2013-03-08 Thread Henrik Nordström
fre 2013-03-08 klockan 10:46 +1300 skrev Charles Manning: > I have had to deal with this a bit so I'll give my 2c. > > Under the GPL2, the company only has to provide source, or make an > offer to do so, to customers buying the product containing the GPL > code. If you go the written offer path t

[U-Boot] Regarding Kernel not starting

2013-03-08 Thread Ramesh K Khokhani
Hi Friends, I have successfully run u-boot our my custom board but I can't run kernel. Problem is that I have saved uImage.bin at NOR location 0x80 and load into DRAM:0x4100. Here u-boot can get kernel info and print into UART consol but after loading uncompressed image from 0x4100 t

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding Kernel not starting

2013-03-08 Thread Mark Jackson
On 08/03/13 09:56, Ramesh K Khokhani wrote: > Hi Friends, > > I have successfully run u-boot our my custom board but I can't run kernel. > Problem is that I have saved uImage.bin at NOR location 0x80 and load > into DRAM:0x4100. Here u-boot can get kernel info and print into UART > conso

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] Exynos5: Pinmux: Add fdt for pinmux

2013-03-08 Thread Akshay Saraswat
Hi Simon, >Hi Akshay, > >On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: >> This patch adds fdt nodes for peripherals which require >> pin muxing and configuration. Device tree bindings for pinctrl >> are kept same as required for Linux. Existing pinmux code >> modified to retrieve gpio ra

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Dear Wolfgang Denk, On Friday, March 8, 2013 6:25:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201303080429.00780.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > > > + # ... and from configs defined from other configs > > > > + s/="\(CONFIG_[A-Za-z0-9_][A-Za-z0-9_]*\)"/=$(\1)/;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] Exynos5: spl: Reduce clock init in spl

2013-03-08 Thread Akshay Saraswat
Hi simon, >+ Albert, Tom who might know about this > >Hi Akshay, > >On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >>>Hi Akshay, >>> >>>On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: This patch subtracts a part of clock init from spl and executes it afte

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Hi Marek, On Friday, March 8, 2013 4:29:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Wolfgang Denk, > > > Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, > > > > In message > > <1362596377-5827-15-git-send-email-benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com> > you wrote: > > > + # ... and from configs defined from other configs > > > + s/="\(CON

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/12] cmd_sf: Add support for read and write instructions

2013-03-08 Thread Michal Simek
2013/3/5 Tom Rini : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/05/2013 01:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>> Okay.. what I understand is - Currently, all the flash supported >>> commands are provided to user as choice. what what i suppose to >>> implement. He needs to choose the best o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 V2] EXYNOS5: Enable Gigabyte device GD25LQ and GD25Q64B

2013-03-08 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Rajeshwari, On 23/01/13 15:30, Rajeshwari Shinde wrote: > This patch set adds driver for Gigabyte device GD25LQ and GD25Q64B > required for Snow board and enables same in config file. > > Based on following patches submitted by Simon Glass: > "sf: Add spi_flash_alloc() to create a new SPI fl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6 V4] EXYNOS5: Add audio support for Snow

2013-03-08 Thread Minkyu Kang
On 15/02/13 14:46, Rajeshwari Shinde wrote: > Driver for MAX98095 is added and support for same is incorporated in > sound driver and Snow Board. > This patchset is based on top of > "EXYNOS5: SNOW: Add initial dts and config file" > > Changes in V2: > - Corrected multi-line comment style

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx28evk: Introduce a new target for saving env vars to NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Introduce 'mx28evk_nand' target for saving environment variables into NAND. > > The mx28evk board does not come with a NAND flash populated from the > factory. It comes with an empty slot (U23), which allows the insertion of a > 48-pin TSOP fl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201303080429.00780.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > + # ... and from configs defined from other configs > > > > + s/="\(CONFIG_[A-Za-z0-9_][A-Za-z0-9_]*\)"/=$(\1)/; > > > > > > Should we not remove the lower case letters here?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, > Hi Marek, > > On Friday, March 8, 2013 4:29:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang Denk, > > > > > Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, > > > > > > In message > > > <1362596377-5827-15-git-send-email-benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com> > > > > you wrote: > > > > + # ... and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek, In message <201303081508.49239.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > > Should we not remove the lower case letters here? Such are not > > > > supposed to be used in macro names. > > > > > > btw. CONFIG_[[:alnum:]_]\+ is shorter ;-) > > > > ...and has the same issue of including the unw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2013 09:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek, > > In message <201303081508.49239.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: >> > Should we not remove the lower case letters here? Such are > not supposed to be used in macro names. btw.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx28evk: Disable CONFIG_CMD_I2C

2013-03-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam When loading a Freescale 2.6.35 on a mx28evk the following issue is seen: sgtl5000_hw_read: read reg error : Reg 0x00 Device with ID register 0 is not a SGTL5000 Disabling CONFIG_CMD_I2C makes the sgtl5000 probe to succeed. Mainline kernel does not show this problem. Until

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > I think the giant list from Benoit got lost. It's a HUGE thing to > change. I think we should just accept that config variables are mixed > case, or at least not block this patch on a very large unrelated fixup. Agreed. Benoit's patch series c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu:mmc: When doing block operations, operate on the given length

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:25:44AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > When working on RAW partitions, it's possible that the whole area > is larger than DDR. So what we need to do is make sure that the length > we are given is aligned with the LBA block size, then pass that length > in as our count of LBA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <5139f87a.7000...@ti.com> you wrote: > > >> What about the CONFIG_8xx_* variables then ? :) > > > > Argh... well, actually these should be fixed. > > I think the giant list from Benoit got lost. It's a HUGE thing to > change. I think we should just accept that config

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu:mmc: When doing block operations, operate on the given length

2013-03-08 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Tom, > When working on RAW partitions, it's possible that the whole area > is larger than DDR. So what we need to do is make sure that the > length we are given is aligned with the LBA block size, then pass > that length in as our count of LBA blocks to operate on. In doing > this, we no long

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v3] ppc4xx: Add lcd4_lwmon5 support

2013-03-08 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds the fast booting LWMON5 derivat "lcd4_lwmon5". Its a stripped down version of the full blown lwmon5 support, without ECC, USB, POST and some other stuff. It used the newly introduced SPL infrastrucure for SPL from NOR flash booting on the PPC4xx. By setting the environment variable

Re: [U-Boot] Beginners Questions on modding a NAS

2013-03-08 Thread JPT
Hi Mike, Sorry, I am partly off-topic. but since cross compiling and uboot images are still close to uboot, i'll stay here. Am 05.03.2013 21:30, schrieb Michael Cashwell: On Mar 5, 2013, at 2:25 PM, JPT wrote: *** Next step, booting from disk ... this works, but the kernel doesn't know

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Warren
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/04/2013 04:26 PM, Tom Warren wrote: >> Thierry, >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Thierry Reding >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:46:48PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >>> [...] I kinda lost track of this patchset. I'd like

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2013 11:36 AM, Tom Warren wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren > wrote: >> On 03/04/2013 04:26 PM, Tom Warren wrote: >>> Thierry, >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Thierry Reding >>> wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 201

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Warren
Tom On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/08/2013 11:36 AM, Tom Warren wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren >> wrote: >>> On 03/04/2013 04:26 PM, Tom Warren wrote: Thierry, On Mon, Mar 4, 201

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/4] disk: define HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE if CONFIG_CMD_PART

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:03:47PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > Various code that is conditional upon HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE is required by > code conditional upon CONFIG_CMD_PART. So, enable HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE if > CONFIG_CMD_PART is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen War

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] disk: define HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE in a common place

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:03:46PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > This set of ifdefs is used in a number of places. Move its definition > somewhere common so it doesn't have to be repeated. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren Acked-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2013 11:48 AM, Tom Warren wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 03/08/2013 11:36 AM, Tom Warren wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren >>> wrote: On 03/04/2013 04:26 PM, Tom Warren wrote: >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Warren
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/08/2013 11:48 AM, Tom Warren wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On 03/08/2013 11:36 AM, Tom Warren wrote: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Warren
Thierry, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Tom Warren wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/08/2013 11:48 AM, Tom Warren wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 03/08/2013 11:36 AM, Tom W

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/9] README: Document current DFU CONFIG options

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
Add documentation for the current DFU config options. DFU is a standard USB device class so more information is available from usb.org Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: - New patch to document existing DFU CONFIG options Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None REA

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/9] Improve DFU support, enable for am335x_evm

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
This series does a few things. I've updated Pantelis Antoniou's patch that allows for transfering of files larger than 4MiB to still allow for filesystem writes to work. I also document the existing DFU CONFIG options, and then the new options this series adds. Then we update nand_(read|write)_s

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 3/9] dfu: Change indentation of defines in

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: - New patch to re-align defines in Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None include/dfu.h |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/dfu.h b/include/dfu.h index 5182c6c..0aae856 100644 --- a/i

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/9] dfu: Support larger than memory transfers.

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
From: Pantelis Antoniou Previously we didn't support upload/download larger than available memory. This is pretty bad when you have to update your root filesystem for example. This patch removes that limitation (and the crashes when you transfered any file larger than 4MB) by making raw image w

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/9] nand: Extend nand_(read|write)_skip_bad with *actual and limit parameters

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
We make these two functions take a size_t pointer to how much space was used on NAND to read or write the buffer (when reads/writes happen) so that bad blocks can be accounted for. We also make them take an loff_t limit on how much data can be read or written. This means that we can now catch the

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 5/9] cmd_nand.c: Fix CONFIG_CMD_NAND_YAFFS

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
The flag changed from WITH_INLINE_OOB to WITH_YAFFS_OOB by accident in 418396e. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: - Add patch to fix CONFIG_CMD_NAND_YAFFS Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None common/cmd_nand.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 6/9] dfu: NAND specific routines for DFU operation

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
From: Pantelis Antoniou Support for NAND storage devices to work with the DFU framework. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: - Document CONFIG_DFU_NAND in README Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: - Rework logic in nand_block_op for nand_(read|write)_sk

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 7/9] am335x_evm: Define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
From: Pantelis Antoniou drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c requires that this is defined early. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Acked-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None include/configs/am335x_evm.h |2 ++

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 8/9] am335x_evm: Add CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS and relevant defaults

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - Add CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS and relevant information to am335x_evm include/configs/am335x_evm.h |9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h b/incl

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 9/9] am335x_evm: Enable DFU for NAND and MMC, provide example alt_infos

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
From: Pantelis Antoniou - Add CONFIG_DFU_NAND, CONFIG_DFU_MMC - Set dfu_alt_info_nand, dfu_alt_info_emmc and dfu_alt_info_mmc to show working examples for those cases. - Increase CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS due to hush parsing bugs that would otherwise disallow 'setenv dfu_alt_info ${dfu_alt_info_nand

[U-Boot] [PATCH] am33xx:ddr:Fix config_sdram to work for all DDR

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
From: Steve Kipisz The original write to sdram_config is correct for DDR3 but incorrect for DDR2 so SPL was hanging. For DDR2, the write to sdram_config should be after the writes to ref_ctrl. This was working for DDR3 because there was a write of 0x2800 to ref_ctrl before a write to sdram_config

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86.git

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:01:52PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Great to see the previous lot made it in. Here is the next x86 series. > > The following changes since commit 2536850d7cd90bdb75bf3ff86838f913392b68db: > > Prepare v2013.04-rc1 (2013-03-04 16:29:17 -0500) > > are avai

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Introduced btrfs file-system with btrload command

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Adnan, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Adnan Ali wrote: > Hi > > On 08/03/13 05:03, Simon Glass wrote: > >> +U-Boot et al >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Adnan Ali >> wrote: >> >>> Introduces btrfs file-system to read file >>> from volume/sub-volumes with btrload command. Thi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] 8xx: Fix build warnings

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
MPC8xx based systems throw this warning: cpu.c:81:2: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] Fix it. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Andy Fleming --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/cpu.c| 4 +++- arch/powerpc/include/asm/8xx_immap.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Feature Removal: disable "mtest" command by default

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
The "mtest" command is of little practical use (if any), and experience has shown that a large number of board configurations define useless or even dangerous start and end addresses. If not even the board maintainers are able to figure out which memory range can be reliably tested, how can we exp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Feature Removal: disable "mtest" command by default

2013-03-08 Thread Ira W. Snyder
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:08:24PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > The "mtest" command is of little practical use (if any), and > experience has shown that a large number of board configurations > define useless or even dangerous start and end addresses. If not even > the board maintainers are able

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] env: don't generate callback list entries for SPL

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote: > SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent the > functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will look at > the list. This caused several SPL builds (e.g. P2020RDB-PC_NAND) to > break due to size

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] env: don't generate callback list entries for SPL

2013-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote: > SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent the > functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will look at > the list. This caused several SPL build

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Feature Removal: disable "mtest" command by default

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ira, In message <20130308194131.ge23...@ovro.caltech.edu> you wrote: > > I noticed a couple of small typos, and thought I'd point them out. Thanks a lot, highly appreciated! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Mu

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Feature Removal: disable "mtest" command by default

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
The "mtest" command is of little practical use (if any), and experience has shown that a large number of board configurations define useless or even dangerous start and end addresses. If not even the board maintainers are able to figure out which memory range can be reliably tested, how can we exp

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] env: don't generate callback list entries for SPL

2013-03-08 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote: >> >>> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries >>> prevent the functions from bein

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: fix 8xx and 82xx type-punning warnings with GCC 4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott, In message <1357696756-31079-1-git-send-email-scottw...@freescale.com> you wrote: > C99's strict aliasing rules are insane to use in low-level code such as a > bootloader, but as Wolfgang has rejected -fno-strict-aliasing in the > past, add a union so that 16-bit accesses can be perfo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 8xx: Fix build warnings

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hi, In message <1362768757-11425-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote: > MPC8xx based systems throw this warning: > > cpu.c:81:2: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break > strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] > > Fix it. I withdraw this patch in favour of Scott's older and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] Exynos5: Pinmux: Add fdt for pinmux

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Akshay, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: > Hi Simon, > > >Hi Akshay, > > > >On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Akshay Saraswat > wrote: > >> This patch adds fdt nodes for peripherals which require > >> pin muxing and configuration. Device tree bindings for pinctrl > >> are

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Add support for Boundary Devices Nitrogen6x boards

2013-03-08 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Eric, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > This patch adds support for the Nitrogen6X board(s) from > Boundary Devices. The boards are based on the i.MX6x > processor family with two major variants: > i.MX6Quad/6Dual > i.MX6Dual-Lite/6Solo > board/boundar

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Add support for Boundary Devices Nitrogen6x boards

2013-03-08 Thread Eric Nelson
Thanks for the review Fabio, On 03/08/2013 03:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Eric, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: This patch adds support for the Nitrogen6X board(s) from Boundary Devices. The boards are based on the i.MX6x processor family with two major variants:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 07/31] Define CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD everywhere

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Wolfgang, On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Simon Glass, > > In message <1362715633-20556-8-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote: > > We are introducing a new unified board setup and we want this to > > be the default. So we need to opt all architectures out f

[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 07/31] __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD controls availabilty of generic board

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
We are introducing a new unified board setup. Add a check to make sure that board config files do not define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD unless their architecture defines __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD will currently not be the default setting, but we can switch this later when m

[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 13/31] arm: Enable generic board support

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
This enables generic board support so that ARM boards can define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v8: - Define __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD in ARM's config.mk Changes in v7: None Changes in v6: None Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Chang

[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 17/31] ppc: Enable generic board support

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
This enables generic board support so that ppc boards can define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v8: - Define __HAVE_ARCH_GENERIC_BOARD in PPC's config.mk Changes in v7: None Changes in v6: None Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Chang

[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 21/31] x86: Enable generic board support

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
This enables generic board support so that x86 boards can define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v8: None Changes in v7: None Changes in v6: None Changes in v5: - Avoid setting up gd on x86 as it is already done Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/12] cmd_sf: Add support for read and write instructions

2013-03-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi All, > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Jagannadha, > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki > > wrote: > >> All these patches are added a support for read and write instruction

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: fix 8xx and 82xx type-punning warnings with GCC 4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2013 03:16:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Scott, In message <1357696756-31079-1-git-send-email-scottw...@freescale.com> you wrote: > C99's strict aliasing rules are insane to use in low-level code such as a > bootloader, but as Wolfgang has rejected -fno-strict-aliasing in the >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v2] env: don't generate callback list entries for SPL

2013-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2013 02:59:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote: >> >>> SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/9] nand: Extend nand_(read|write)_skip_bad with *actual and limit parameters

2013-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2013 11:37:23 AM, Tom Rini wrote: We make these two functions take a size_t pointer to how much space was used on NAND to read or write the buffer (when reads/writes happen) so that bad blocks can be accounted for. We also make them take an loff_t limit on how much data can be read o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 6/9] dfu: NAND specific routines for DFU operation

2013-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2013 11:37:25 AM, Tom Rini wrote: From: Pantelis Antoniou Support for NAND storage devices to work with the DFU framework. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Changes in v5: - Document CONFIG_DFU_NAND in README Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: - Rework lo

Re: [U-Boot] Atheros "ART" data crc calculation

2013-03-08 Thread filzek
Hi, We need your help on this question, we had the same problem, did you figure out how the CRC was calculated to the device? This is very important. Can you help me on this? -- View this message in context: http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/Re-Atheros-ART-data-crc-calculation-tp143096p149334

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add U_BOOT_TIMESTAMP definition

2013-03-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Matt, In message <1345733053-5023-1-git-send-email-m...@genesi-usa.com> you wrote: > This gives us a string like "20120822150855" which encodes the build time. > > This allows automated version checking and flashing of U-Boot to be performed, > for example, in boot.scr files (or scripting in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] omap mmc: implement card detect and write protection

2013-03-08 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi guys, This patch set is "floating" already for _three_ months. All comments were addressed, it introduces negative diff stat, and provides two useful features (also for production automation). Andy hasn't been responding for quite a while. I think this patch set is good enough for merging. The