Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/24] mxc_i2c: fix i2c_imx_stop

2012-06-24 Thread Stefano Babic
On 22/06/2012 06:11, Troy Kisky wrote: > Instead of clearing 2 bits, all the other > bits were set because '|=' was used instead > of '&='. > > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > --- > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Note: > > All patches in the se

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: add a comment about local copy of print_cpuinfo method

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message <1340482108-18468-2-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > --- > board/freescale/mx53loco/mx53loco.c |2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Argh!!!

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message <1340482108-18468-3-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > --- > board/freescale/mx53loco/mx53loco.c |5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/24] mxc_i2c.c: code i2c_probe as a 0 length i2c_write

2012-06-24 Thread Stefano Babic
On 22/06/2012 06:12, Troy Kisky wrote: > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > --- > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 29 - > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c > index 626960d..4f12b9e 100644 > --- a/drivers

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/24] mxc_i2c: create i2c_init_transfer

2012-06-24 Thread Stefano Babic
On 22/06/2012 06:12, Troy Kisky wrote: > Initial code of i2c_read and i2c_write > is identical, move to subroutine. > > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > --- Acked-by: Stefano Babic Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/24] mxc_i2c: prep work for multiple busses support

2012-06-24 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Troy, On 22.06.2012 06:12, Troy Kisky wrote: Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 121 - 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c index cb061f7..ec0579

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/24] mxc_i2c: add bus recovery support

2012-06-24 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Troy, On 22.06.2012 06:12, Troy Kisky wrote: Toggling the scl line 9 clocks is the standard way of returning a locked up bus to idle condition. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support new arch: c6x

2012-06-24 Thread bond
Dear Wolfgang Denk, In message <20120623123302.5abca200...@gemini.denx.de> you wrote: > Dear Dmitry Bondar, > > In message <1340449870-26456-1-git-send-email-b...@inmys.ru> you wrote: >> C6X (C6000) is family of fixed and floating-point DSPs manufactured by >> Texas Instruments. >> >> Signed-off-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Otavio Salvador, > > In message <1340482108-18468-4-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you wrote: > > In case an unidentified CPU type is detected it now returns > > i.MX, in a const char. > > ... > > > -static char *get_imx_type(u32 imxtype) > > +static const c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> But in which way would "" be better than "unknown"?  It >> just costs 7 more bytes of memory... > > "i.MXunknown" is much more weird than "i.MX" . This is on my > tap, I think both are equally weird. This message is so rare that I also ag

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Fabio Estevam, > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> But in which way would "" be better than "unknown"? It > >> just costs 7 more bytes of memory... > > > > "i.MXunknown" is much more weird than "i.MX" . This is on > > my tap, > > I think both are equally weird. Thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support new arch: c6x

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear b...@inmys.ru, In message <31ab63da18246416f011fefc86653461.squirrel@78.108.93.81> you wrote: > > After rework, code in arch/c6x > tools/checkpatch.pl 0001-Add-support-new-arch-c6x.patch tell me: > "total: 0 errors, 39 warnings, 3065 lines checked" Thanks. > can i try send patch to list, or

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201206241508.42858.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > "i.MXunknown" is much more weird than "i.MX" . This is on my > tap, In which way is "unknown" different (or even more weird) than "unidentified"? We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning. How

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Add GPIO driver for BCM2835 SoC

2012-06-24 Thread Vikram Narayanan
Add a GPIO driver for the BCM2835 Soc. Refer Datasheet http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf Also, add the driver to the raspberrypi's default config Vikram Narayanan (2): bcm: Add GPIO driver for BCM2835 SoC rbpi: Add BCM2835 GPIO driver for raspb

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] bcm: Add GPIO driver for BCM2835 SoC

2012-06-24 Thread Vikram Narayanan
Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan Cc: Stephen Warren Cc: Albert Aribaud --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/gpio.h | 49 +++ drivers/gpio/Makefile|1 + drivers/gpio/rpi_gpio.c | 128 ++ 3 files changed, 178 inserti

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] rbpi: Add BCM2835 GPIO driver for raspberry pi

2012-06-24 Thread Vikram Narayanan
Add the driver to the rpi_b's default config Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan Cc: Stephen Warren Cc: Albert Aribaud --- include/configs/rpi_b.h |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/rpi_b.h b/include/configs/rpi_b.h index f547027..fb45a18 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: add a comment about local copy of print_cpuinfo method

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Please mark updated versions of a patch in the Subject:, and include a > change log. This was sent by mistake; the updated patch has been sent together. Sorry for the noise. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-ma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> +/* >> + * Usually this is called too early printing a wrong information about >> + * the clock. To fix it we need to provide this local method and call >> + * it later in board_init. >> + */ > > > I don't like this change. It messes with th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning.  How > about that? Will send a patch with that. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning. How > > about that? > > Will send a patch with that. What about i.MX ? Best regards, Marek Vasut ___ U-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Otavio Salvador, > >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning.  How >> > about that? >> >> Will send a patch with that. > > What about i.MX ? I like it. -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/24] mxc_i2c: prep work for multiple busses support

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Heiko Schocher, > Hello Troy, > > On 22.06.2012 06:12, Troy Kisky wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky > > --- > > > > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 121 > > - 1 file changed, 100 > > insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/driver

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I don't like this change. It messes with the initialization sequence, >> which is not a good thing. Instead of shift more and more things >> backwards, we should fix any incorrect clock calculations here. > > Right however the clock calcul

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
In case an unidentified CPU type is detected it now returns i.MX??, in a const char. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador Cc: Marek Vasut Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Fabio Estevam Changes since v1: * use i.MX?? for unidentified CPU type --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/imx-common/cpu.c |4 ++-- 1 file change

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo()

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and includes the revision of the chip on the output. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador Cc: Marek Vasut Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Fabio Estevam --- Changes since v1: * use ?? for unidentified revision and cpu type * use numeric revision

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: add a comment about local copy of print_cpuinfo method

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message you wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Please mark updated versions of a patch in the Subject:, and include a > > change log. > > This was sent by mistake; the updated patch has been sent together. > Sorry for the noise. But the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message you wrote: > > Right however the clock calculation is right but in regular > initialization sequence this information is printed too early so Fabio > has moved it here to change this ordering. Who says it's "too early"? I claim it has been at the right place.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201206242153.14469.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > Dear Otavio Salvador, > > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning. How > > > about that? > > > > Will send a patch with that. > > W

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/24] mxc_i2c: prep work for multiple busses support

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201206242208.51305.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > static unsigned int __attribute__((section (".data"))) g_bus = 0; > > This is a good knowledge to have, adding it amongst important emails :) Please add a note to it that whenever youneed doing this, chance

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: add a comment about local copy of print_cpuinfo method

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > But the updated patch did not contaiy indication of an pdate either, > nor any change log. > > This is what I'm complaining about! Stop complaining! I SAID SORRY... For the third time ... I sent it by mistake; read the another... -- Otavio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message <1340573676-29765-1-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you wrote: > In case an unidentified CPU type is detected it now returns > i.MX??, in a const char. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > > C

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Who says it's "too early"?  I claim it has been at the right place. It needs I2C and when called in imx-common it doesn't have it enabled yet. Fabio, am I missing something? -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mai

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > The change long belongs _below_ the "---" line, not above it, where it > becomes part of the commessage. I used git send-email --annotate but probably did something wrong as it didn't ask me to edit this one. I am tracking the changelog on c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201206242153.14469.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: >> Dear Otavio Salvador, >> >> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> > > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning.  How

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Otavio Salvador, In message you wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Who says it's "too early"? =A0I claim it has been at the right place. > > It needs I2C and when called in imx-common it doesn't have it enabled > yet. Fabio, am I missing something? This sh

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] CACHE: Finishing touches

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Add a few finishing touches for the cache support. Then ultimately enable cache support on m28. BIG FAT NOTE: This is for -next. This may break something. Compile testing IS STILL IN PROGRESS! Marek Vasut (9): COMMON: Add __stringify() function CACHE: Add cache_aligned() macro

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] CACHE: fatload: Test if start address is aligned

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This prevents the scenario where data cache is on and the device uses DMA to deploy data. In that case, it might not be possible to flush/invalidate data to RAM properly. The other option is to use bounce buffer, but that involves a lot of copying and therefore degrades performance rapidly. Therefo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] CACHE: Add cache_aligned() macro

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This macro returns 1 if the argument (address) is aligned, returns zero otherwise. This will be used to test user-supplied address to various commands to prevent user from loading data to/from unaligned address when using caches. This is made as a macro, because macros are expanded where they are

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] COMMON: Add __stringify() function

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This function converts static number to string in preprocessor. This is useful as it allows higher usage of puts() in favour of printf() Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Wolfgang Denk --- include/common.h |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/com

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] CACHE: ext2load: Test if start address is aligned

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This prevents the scenario where data cache is on and the device uses DMA to deploy data. In that case, it might not be possible to flush/invalidate data to RAM properly. The other option is to use bounce buffer, but that involves a lot of copying and therefore degrades performance rapidly. Therefo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] CACHE: nand read/write: Test if start address is aligned

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This prevents the scenario where data cache is on and the device uses DMA to deploy data. In that case, it might not be possible to flush/invalidate data to RAM properly. The other option is to use bounce buffer, but that involves a lot of copying and therefore degrades performance rapidly. Therefo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] CACHE: net: Test if start address is aligned

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This prevents the scenario where data cache is on and the device uses DMA to deploy data. In that case, it might not be possible to flush/invalidate data to RAM properly. The other option is to use bounce buffer, but that involves a lot of copying and therefore degrades performance rapidly. Therefo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] CACHE: mmc read/write: Test if start address is aligned

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
This prevents the scenario where data cache is on and the device uses DMA to deploy data. In that case, it might not be possible to flush/invalidate data to RAM properly. The other option is to use bounce buffer, but that involves a lot of copying and therefore degrades performance rapidly. Therefo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] M28EVK: Enable instruction and data cache

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/m28evk.h |2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/m28evk.h b/include/configs/m28evk.h index b730b2a..347a3ea 100644 --- a/include/configs/m28evk.h +++ b/include/c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] CACHE: net: asix: Fix asix driver to work with data cache on

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
The asix driver did not align buffers, therefore it didn't work with data cache enabled. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Joe Hershberger --- drivers/usb/eth/asix.c | 29 - 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/eth/asix

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201206242153.14469.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Dear Otavio Salvador, > > > > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > We could also print "i.MX???" to express whaty we are meaning. How > > > > about that? > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel : usb : add EHCI driver for Atmel SoC

2012-06-24 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Marek, On 6/21/2012 18:17, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Bo Shen, Some Atmel SoC support USB EHCI, add the EHCI driver to support it. To enable the USB EHCI, add the following configuration options into board relative configuration file and remove USB OHCI options. #define CONFIG_USB_EHCI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel : usb : add EHCI driver for Atmel SoC

2012-06-24 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Bo Shen, > Hi Marek, > > On 6/21/2012 18:17, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Bo Shen, > > > >> Some Atmel SoC support USB EHCI, add the EHCI driver to support it. > >> > >> To enable the USB EHCI, add the following configuration options into > >> board relative configuration file and remove US

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel : usb : add EHCI driver for Atmel SoC

2012-06-24 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Marek, On 6/25/2012 10:57, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Bo Shen, Hi Marek, On 6/21/2012 18:17, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Bo Shen, Some Atmel SoC support USB EHCI, add the EHCI driver to support it. To enable the USB EHCI, add the following configuration options into board relative configurati

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo()

2012-06-24 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and > includes the revision of the chip on the output. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > > --- > Changes since v

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/24] mxc_i2c.c: finish adding CONFIG_I2C_MULTI_BUS support

2012-06-24 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: > > Correct and correct. If you need i2c working before relocation, you cannot > enable MULTI_BUS. That sounds like a really strong limitation of MULTI_BUS. i2c is necessary for SPD, which is needed to initialize DDR. -- Timur Tabi Linux kerne

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx53loco: Add a comment about local print_cpuinfo method in board file

2012-06-24 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Wolfang, On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> It needs I2C and when called in imx-common it doesn't have it enabled >> yet. Fabio, am I missing something? > > This should be fixed, then.  There are quite a number of systems that > need I2C early - for example, sucht that s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] microblaze: avoid compile error on systems without cfi flash

2012-06-24 Thread Michal Simek
On 06/21/2012 09:42 PM, Stephan Linz wrote: Use XILINX_FLASH_START to set/unset FLASH and RAMENV. Error was: board.c: In function 'board_init': board.c:134: error: 'XILINX_FLASH_START' undeclared (first use in this function) board.c:134: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config.mk:Update DBGFLAGS with dwarf information

2012-06-24 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Hi Mike/Graeme. Please help me in closing review related comments on this patch. Thanks, Prabhakar On 06/19/2012 10:38 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: Hi, Sorry for the delayed response. I somehow missed this :( On 06/19/2012 10:29 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: Hi Prabhakar, On Thu, May 24

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config.mk:Update DBGFLAGS with dwarf information

2012-06-24 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Prabhakar On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > Hi Mike/Graeme. > > Please help me in closing review related comments on this patch. > I can't offer any comments either way regarding -gdwarf-2 as I have never done any runtime debugging of U-Boot I was only pointing out

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] microblaze: Enable ubi support

2012-06-24 Thread Michal Simek
On 06/21/2012 09:42 PM, Stephan Linz wrote: To save memory the UBIFS is disabled by default. The original patch was introdused with commit: 0114da7b06bd47b7f5c3f20a152dd11903b38fba This say nothing to me. Format is Patch name and when sha1. Where is this patch? I can't see it in mainline repo

[U-Boot] problems when large nand flash used

2012-06-24 Thread Сергей К .
Hello all! I have some problem when using NAND flash manufactured by Toshiba. The device ID is 0xD7 , value 4Gbyte, page size 0x1000, erase blocksize 0x8. The board is at91sam9260 based custom board. At first I was a normal performance of the board with a chip samsung k9k8g08 and u-boot versi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/1] tegra: usb: Fix device enumeration problem of USB1

2012-06-24 Thread Jim Lin
A known hardware issue of USB1 port where bit 1 (connect status change) of PORTSC register will be set after issuing Port Reset (like "usb reset" in u-boot command line). This will be treated as an error and stops later device enumeration. Therefore we clear that bit after Port Reset in order to p