Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post, arm, memorytest: add support for arm based boards

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4de72566.9040...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Hmm.. I thought of that too, but wouldn;t it be better to use > gd->ram_size in post/drivers/memory.c, as this is defined in > global_data for all archs? Indeed. Can you do this, please? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk --

[U-Boot] Lawyer Needed

2011-06-02 Thread Kouvel, Alex
I need a Business/Commercial litigation lawyer who can handle a collection issue. Please let know if you can be of assistance to me or If not a referral Contact privately via email: bryan.steve...@cafuc.net could be helpful. Regards Steve Bryan ___ U

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] common/cmd_nand.c: add ifdef protection for do_bootm

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 15:21:54 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > actually, if you dont mind, i'd like to obsolete this patch with the one > > below. what do you think ? > > Please submit it as a proper patch then. i was going to once i got feedback from the interested partie

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post, arm, memorytest: add support for arm based boards

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 01:53:42 Heiko Schocher wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so add bi_memsize to arm ? it's the only arch that lacks it. > > Hmm.. I thought of that too, but wouldn;t it be better to use > gd->ram_size in post/drivers/memory.c, as this is defined in > global_data for all

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 15:58:50 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > It appears this is mostly new stuff, right? not really these are absolutely fixes: Blackfin: cm-bf537e/cm-bf537u/tcm-bf537: update embedded env settings Blackfin: use on-chip reset func with newer parts Blackfin: bf548-ezkit/bf561-ezkit:

[U-Boot] [PATCH] autostart: unify duplicated logic into the bootm code

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
Rather than having a bunch of random commands handle autostart behavior, unify the logic in a single place. This also fixes building of these different commands when bootm is disabled. Acked-by: Matthew McClintock Acked-by: Scott Wood Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- common/cmd_bootm.c | 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: designware: fix unused warning when CONFIG_DW_AUTONEG is enabled

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
The ctrl variable is only used when autoneg support is disabled, so only declare it under those conditions to avoid an unused variable warning. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- drivers/net/designware.c |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/desig

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: designware: fix uninitialized phy_addr usage

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
When CONFIG_DW_SEARCH_PHY is disabled, the local phy_addr variable never gets initialized causes random behavior at runtime and a gcc warning. So set it by default to the stored phy address. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger --- drivers/net/designware.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+),

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/22] omap4: add spl support for OMAP4 SDP

2011-06-02 Thread Aneesh V
Hi Wolfgang, What's your final view on the Makefile structure of SPL. best regards, Aneesh On Thursday 26 May 2011 06:55 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 06:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Aneesh V, >> >> In message<4dd26b36.4050...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> >>> And

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH]Uboot tool Makefile patch for Mac OSX Snow leopard

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
could you provide some real details as to what the problem is you're hitting and why/how this fixes things ? 2011.03 builds fine for me on leopard (10.5). -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ U-Boot mailing lis

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/22] omap: add spl support

2011-06-02 Thread Aneesh V
Hi Wolfgang, On Thursday 26 May 2011 07:21 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 01:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Aneesh V, >> >> In message<4dd21cd8.2080...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> There are common, board independent parts both in spl/nand and spl/onenand. >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx31ads: Use the new relocation scheme

2011-06-02 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Stefano, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: ... > I know it is the same, but if you use PHYS_SDRAM_1 instead of > CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE (as most boards do), the reader understands easier > that the start address and the size are strictly connected. OK. > >> --- a/board/free

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx31ads: Use the new relocation scheme

2011-06-02 Thread Stefano Babic
On 06/02/2011 06:02 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > Hi Fabio, > > My intention on this patch was to fix the MX31ADS build so that this > board does not get removed from U-boot. Sure. This is the first goal. > > Would it be OK if I resend a new patch taking in consideration your > ot

[U-Boot] Dreamplug into mainline

2011-06-02 Thread Jason
Prafulla, As a practical learning exercise, I'm going to attempt to add support for the Dreamplug into the mainline u-boot tree. I'm starting with the board number. It is currently 2659. The same as the Guruplug. This is less than ideal because the Dreamplug has 2MB (yes, megabytes) of SPI fla

[U-Boot] Issues building for the P2020 (linking)

2011-06-02 Thread Stafford, Matthew
Hi, I'm currently trying to build out of git and am seeing an issue with the final linking during the build. I've included the relevant dump: Using P2020DS_config UNDEF_SYM=`powerpc-linux-gnu-objdump -x board/freescale/p2020ds/libp2020ds.o api/libapi.o arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/libmpc85xx.o arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx31ads: Use the new relocation scheme

2011-06-02 Thread Fabio Estevam
This fixes the MX31ADS build by using the new relocation scheme. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- Changes since v2: - Use PHYS_SDRAM_1 in get_ram_size - Remove local config.mk Changes since v1: - Fixed lines over 80 characters. Build tested only. Do not have the hardware handy to test. board

Re: [U-Boot] Issues building for the P2020 (linking)

2011-06-02 Thread Alex Waterman
> /opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.4.78-eglibc-2.10.78/powerpc-linux-gnu/lib > /gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.4.1/nof -lgcc -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot > powerpc-linux-gnu-ld: section .bootpg loaded at [e000,e237] > overlaps section .data loaded at [efffc16c,f000347b] > powerpc-linux-gnu-ld: u-boot:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] nand_spl/spiboot/sdboot: Add ability to have smaller middle loader

2011-06-02 Thread y
From: Matthew McClintock This patch allows some boards do define CONFIG_BOOTSTRAP to let them build a MPL or middle program loader to setup the board before booting to the full u-boot build. The advantage is that we are using the same build system and linker scripts that would be used in a normal

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common/env_common: Add CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_AT_BOOT env option

2011-06-02 Thread y
From: Matthew McClintock Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new define to add this to the default environment easily Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock --- README |4 common/env_common.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common/env_common: Add CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_AT_BOOT env option

2011-06-02 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
Ugh. I just messed that up. Ignore this patch series. -M On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, wrote: > From: Matthew McClintock > > Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE > silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new > define to add this to the default environm

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common/env_common: Add CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_AT_BOOT env option

2011-06-02 Thread Matthew McClintock
Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new define to add this to the default environment easily Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock --- README |4 common/env_common.c |3 +++ 2 files changed, 7

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] nand_spl/spiboot/sdboot: Add ability to have smaller middle loader

2011-06-02 Thread Matthew McClintock
This patch allows some boards do define CONFIG_BOOTSTRAP to let them build a MPL or middle program loader to setup the board before booting to the full u-boot build. The advantage is that we are using the same build system and linker scripts that would be used in a normal u-boot build. This is use

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Add P1021MDS board support

2011-06-02 Thread Matthew McClintock
From: Haiying Wang This patch supports P1021MDS board to boot from NAND flash (No NOR flash on this board). And because P1021 only has 256K L2 SRAM, which can not used for final uboot image it makes use of the MPL. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang Signed-off-by: Mohit Kumar Signed-off-by: Yu Liu S

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

2011-06-02 Thread Matthew McClintock
Allow users to pass in extra defines via make so they can modify the build. Example make P1022DS EXTRA_OPTS=NAND is equivalent to make P1022DS_NAND Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock --- mkconfig |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/mkconfig b/mkconfi

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Add P1021MDS board support

2011-06-02 Thread y
From: Haiying Wang This patch supports P1021MDS board to boot from NAND flash (No NOR flash on this board). And because P1021 only has 256K L2 SRAM, which can not used for final uboot image it makes use of the MPL. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang Signed-off-by: Mohit Kumar Signed-off-by: Yu Liu S

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

2011-06-02 Thread y
From: Matthew McClintock Allow users to pass in extra defines via make so they can modify the build. Example make P1022DS EXTRA_OPTS=NAND is equivalent to make P1022DS_NAND Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock --- mkconfig |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot] Dreamplug into mainline

2011-06-02 Thread Jason
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:11:04PM -0400, Jason wrote: > Prafulla, > > As a practical learning exercise, I'm going to attempt to add support > for the Dreamplug into the mainline u-boot tree. > > I'm starting with the board number. It is currently 2659. The same as > the Guruplug. This is less

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Tom Warren
Albert/Wolfgang, I believe this patchset should be GTG. Are there any objections outstanding that I've failed to answer? Thanks, Tom On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:49, Michael Walle wrote: >> Am Di, 3.05.2011, 00:45, schrieb Tom Warren: >>>

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request u-boot-blackfin.git

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <201106021102.08032.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > > these are absolutely fixes: > Blackfin: cm-bf537e/cm-bf537u/tcm-bf537: update embedded env settings > Blackfin: use on-chip reset func with newer parts > Blackfin: bf548-ezkit/bf561-ezkit: update env location > B

Re: [U-Boot] Issues building for the P2020 (linking)

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Stafford, Matthew", In message <0b0a20d0b3ecd742aa2514c8dda3b06505122...@vgaexch01.hq.corp.viasat.com> you wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to build out of git and am seeing an issue with the > final linking during the build. I've included the relevant dump: > > Using P2020DS_confi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Warren, In message you wrote: > > I believe this patchset should be GTG. Are there any objections > outstanding that I've failed to answer? GTG ??? I did not see any cleanup resulting from Mike's comment here: 05/02 Mike Frysinger Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO dri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Tom Warren
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Warren, > > In message you wrote: >> >> I believe this patchset should be GTG.  Are there any objections >> outstanding that I've failed to answer? > > GTG ??? Good To Go. > > > I did not see any cleanup resulting from Mike's commen

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Warren, In message you wrote: > > Let me double-check. IIRC, one (cmd_gpio) didn't apply since it was > from another SoC and didn't have the commands we use on Tegra, and the > other (where the driver should go) ended with Mike saying "i'm not > sure sweating the location of the driver i

[U-Boot] [STATUS] v2011.06-rc2 released

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello everybody: * U-Boot v2011.06-rc2 was released on Thu, June 02, 2011 * Release "v2011.06" is scheduled in 10 days - on June 12, 2011. Please help testing, and check if all your relevant patches have been included. Note that still a large number of ARM boards are broken. I hope many people

[U-Boot] [STATUS] WARNING: huge ARM board removal pending

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hi, this is a * W A R N I N G * message to maintainers / users / owners of ARM boards. If your board fails to build in the current release, it will be subject to a big cleanup action which is going to remove all old, unmaintained and broken boards in the next merge window. According to our curre

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Tom Warren
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Warren, > > In message you wrote: >> >> Let me double-check. IIRC, one (cmd_gpio) didn't apply since it was >> from another SoC and didn't have the commands we use on Tegra, and the >> other (where the driver should go) ended with Mi

Re: [U-Boot] Dreamplug into mainline

2011-06-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Jason [mailto:u-b...@lakedaemon.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:41 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Dreamplug into mainline > > Prafulla, > > As a practical learning exercise, I'm going to attempt to add support > for

[U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDKV310: MMC_SPL: Fix building when using "make O="

2011-06-02 Thread Chander Kashyap
Fixes dependency build error with "make O=" option. "make O=" option is used to specify output directory. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- mmc_spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/mmc_spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Warren, In message you wrote: > > >> Let me double-check. IIRC, one (cmd_gpio) didn't apply since it was > >> from another SoC and didn't have the commands we use on Tegra, and the > >> other (where the driver should go) ended with Mike saying "i'm not > >> sure sweating the location of

[U-Boot] [WIKI][Timer]New Timer API Page added to Wiki

2011-06-02 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi all, I've just created a new Wiki entry for the new Timer API at: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/TaskTimerAPI Right now it only details the user-level interface to the API while we still work out the nuts and bolts underneath - Please take a look and comment Regards, Graeme _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common/env_common: Add CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_AT_BOOT env option

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 15:27:29 y...@right.am.freescale.net wrote: > Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE > silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new > define to add this to the default environment easily any reason you couldnt add silent=0 to CONFIG_E

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 15:27:30 y...@right.am.freescale.net wrote: > --- a/mkconfig > +++ b/mkconfig > @@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ if [ "${ARCH}" -a "${ARCH}" != "${arch}" ]; then > exit 1 > fi > > +if [ -z "${options}" ] ; then > +options+=$EXTRA_OPTS > +else > +options+=,$EXTRA_OPTS > +fi sty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 17:30:09 Tom Warren wrote: > Let me double-check. IIRC, one (cmd_gpio) didn't apply since it was > from another SoC no, it isnt. it's using the generic GPIO API as defined by Linux and implemented by many ports in u-boot. any new GPIO provider in u-boot should probab

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] GPIO: Tegra2: add GPIO driver for Tegra2

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 17:55:55 Tom Warren wrote: > Actually, if you do a kompare between cmd_gpio.c and tegra2_gpio.c, > there's virtually no 'duplicated' code, just 2 different > implementations of do_gpio, with different args and parsing of params, > etc. I use info, port, input and output,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] common/env_common: Add CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE_AT_BOOT env option

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 15:34:57 Matthew McClintock wrote: > Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE > silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new > define to add this to the default environment easily any reason you couldnt add silent=0 to CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 15:34:58 Matthew McClintock wrote: > --- a/mkconfig > +++ b/mkconfig > @@ -81,6 +81,12 @@ if [ "${ARCH}" -a "${ARCH}" != "${arch}" ]; then > exit 1 > fi > > +if [ -z "${options}" ] ; then > +options+=$EXTRA_OPTS > +else > +options+=,$EXTRA_OPTS > +fi style is bro

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post, arm, memorytest: add support for arm based boards

2011-06-02 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Mike, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday, June 02, 2011 01:53:42 Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> so add bi_memsize to arm ? it's the only arch that lacks it. >> Hmm.. I thought of that too, but wouldn;t it be better to use >> gd->ram_size in post/drivers/memory.c, as thi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] post, memorytest: add support for none powerpc archs

2011-06-02 Thread Heiko Schocher
change bd->bi_memsize to gd->ram_size, as this is defined on all archs, so this post test can used on none powerpc archs too. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher cc: Wolfgang Denk cc: Mike Frysinger --- changes for v2: added comment from Wolfgang Denk: - add comment, that this function is only

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] powerpc/85xx: Fix compile errors if CONFIG_SYS_DPAA_QBMAN isn't set

2011-06-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 23, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Add ifdef protection for qp_info and liodn associated with Q/BMan. Also > rearrange setting of _tbl_sz variables to utilize existing ifdef > protection for things like FMAN. > > Also add protection around setup_portals() call in corenet_ds board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] powerpc/85xx: Add NAND boot support for P3041/P5020DS

2011-06-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 23, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Shaohui Xie wrote: > When booting from NAND we get the environment from NAND. > > Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > changes for v2: > move _NAND up to sorted by alpha. > > boards.cfg |2 ++ > include/configs/corene

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post, arm, memorytest: add support for arm based boards

2011-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4de8739d.2040...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Yep, good question ... maybe, no arm based board has defined > > "#if defined(CONFIG_PRAM) || defined(CONFIG_LOGBUFFER)" That's actually very likely. ARM systems tended to be simple and not use any such fancy features.