On 05/05/2011 08:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Holger Brunck,
>
> In message <4dc253a5.6010...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> As the merge window is closed, this new patch series will not go into
>>> this upcoming release any more.
>>
>> Sorry but why this? The initial patch serie was postet
On 05/05/2011 09:06 AM, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Well, as already said this is related to CRC calculation of environment. I
> did
> a fast port to v2011.03 and the setenv is a lot faster, which is due the new
> env code base.
> But I also noticed the time until kernel_entry is called is about 3
Dear Michael Schwingen,
In message <20110505214836.ga5...@discworld.dascon.de> you wrote:
>
> to conclude the discussion in the thread "Re: [U-Boot] Update and Cut down
> mach types", I tried a short patch that demonstrates how to automatically
> generate the mach-types.h file from a database dum
Dear Holger Brunck,
In message <4dc3ad11.5080...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>
> yes if there is something completely new it goes into next. But both reworked
> series posted from myside have no new patches and no new features inside the
> patches. Ok two patches are squashed to one, as a result of an
commit 91a3c14c (ppc, mgcoge: add DIP switch detection)
introduces an compile error due to an missing define in the
mgcoge2ne.h. DIP switch detection is valid for both boards.
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck
cc: Wolfgang Denk
cc: Heiko Schocher
---
include/configs/mgcoge2ne.h |3 +++
1 files
On 05/06/2011 12:17 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> So back to my original question should I post a bugfix patch for the compile
>> issue for mgcoge2ne and rebase the serie "[PATCH v2 0/7] km82xx mainlining"
>> above this patch or is it ok if it get fixed with this serie?
>
> If it's not too much of e
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 19:30:29 Scott Wood wrote:
> > + nand_chip.options = 0;
> > board_nand_init(&nand_chip);
> >
> > if (nand_chip.select_chip)
>
> Maybe nand_chip should be made static so it goes in the BSS? This would
> avoid any other such problems, without adding any extra
> -Original Message-
> From: Clint Adams [mailto:cl...@debian.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:31 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk; Ashish Karkare;
> Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Clint Adams
> Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] OpenRD-Client and OpenRD-
Hi Albert
Please kindly pull
The following changes since commit 2fa8ca98c37d5b1bb0328b19ddb7e9d162cd9683:
Grant Likely (1):
Add CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT to more boards.
are available in the git repository at:
u-boot-marvell.git master branch.
Clint Adams (4):
Rename openrd_base files
I have a custom MPC8313ERD board loaded with u-boot 1.1.6 and the network PHY
is
NetSemi DP83849C. The PHY info is copied from DP83865 and the network works
fine.
Recently I am trying to upgrade u-boot to 2010.12 but I got Ping failed and
host
is not alive message when I ping the same host.
A
I can create a uImage with mkimage with "-C gzip" and it boots fine.
If I use "-C none", it hangs on boot with bootm in u-boot. The
arguments below come directly from the linux-2.6.35.12 kernel which
creates uImage from vmlinux.bin.gz (which is already compressed, I
know, but that is a different is
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:24:27 -0700
> Von: Charles Krinke
> An: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Betreff: [U-Boot] understanding mkimage a bit more
> I can create a uImage with mkimage with "-C gzip" and it boots fine.
> If I use "-C none", it hangs on boot with bo
The ePAPR specification says that phandle properties should be called
"phandle", and not "linux,phandle". To facilitate the migration from
"linux,phandle" to "phandle", we update fdt_qportal() to support both
properties.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/portals.c | 13 ++
The ePAPR specification says that phandle properties should be called
"phandle", and not "linux,phandle". To facilitate the migration from
"linux,phandle" to "phandle", we update some functions to support both
properties.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
---
common/fdt_support.c |6 ++
include
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Gerhard Pircher
wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:24:27 -0700
> > Von: Charles Krinke
> > An: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Betreff: [U-Boot] understanding mkimage a bit more
>
> > I can create a uImage with mkimage with "-C
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Charles Krinke wrote:
> The next issue is the flash file system. Normally, I like to use JFFS2
> for reliability as embedded devices frequently have their power switch
> turned off at any time. I do understand that UBIFS is getting more
> prevalent lately a
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Eric Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Charles Krinke wrote:
>> The next issue is the flash file system. Normally, I like to use JFFS2
>> for reliability as embedded devices frequently have their power switch
>> turned off at any time. I do
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The ePAPR specification says that phandle properties should be called
> "phandle", and not "linux,phandle". To facilitate the migration from
> "linux,phandle" to "phandle", we update some functions to support both
> properties.
>
> Signed-off-b
Grant Likely wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, upstream libfdt already supports the "phandle"
> property, so u-boot needs to be updated to the latest version from the
> dtc.git repo on git.jdl.com. You'll still need the change to
> common/fdt_support.c though.
Upstream libfdt was fixed back in 2009.
On Fri, 6 May 2011 08:05:18 -0700
Jerry Wang wrote:
> I have a custom MPC8313ERD board loaded with u-boot 1.1.6 and the network PHY
> is
> NetSemi DP83849C. The PHY info is copied from DP83865 and the network works
> fine.
>
> Recently I am trying to upgrade u-boot to 2010.12 but I got Ping f
The ePAPR specification says that phandle properties should be called
"phandle", and not "linux,phandle". To facilitate the migration from
"linux,phandle" to "phandle", we update some functions to support both
properties.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
---
Upstream libfdt already has the ePAPR chang
Hi Prafulla,
Please do not use my former address; use my current From: one.
Le 06/05/2011 15:25, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
> Hi Albert
>
> Please kindly pull
> The following changes since commit 2fa8ca98c37d5b1bb0328b19ddb7e9d162cd9683:
>Grant Likely (1):
> Add CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT to
On Wed, 4 May 2011 16:30:00 -0700
Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> This is a very useful patch and it works well. I have taken the liberty of
> modifying it slightly, because I think you should subtract 1 from the port
> number that you pass to NS16550. For some reason the 'COM' ports are
> nu
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:45:08AM -0700, Charles Krinke wrote:
> I understand a bit about setting up JFFS2 and have used
> drivers/mtd/maps for this purpose. I also understand that in setting
> up UBIFS, I will enable UBIFS in the linux kernel.
>
> But, on the flash, I am a little perplexed as I
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Eric Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:45:08AM -0700, Charles Krinke wrote:
>> I understand a bit about setting up JFFS2 and have used
>> drivers/mtd/maps for this purpose. I also understand that in setting
>> up UBIFS, I will enable UBIFS in the linux kern
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net]
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 1:30 AM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; 'u-boot@lists.denx.de'; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan
> Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: Pull request u-boot-marvell.git
>
> Hi Prafulla,
Hi there
We hope that you're a little familiar by now with the exclusive monthly Art of
England Magazine.
Many similar organisations to yours have used the magazine recently as a
marketing 'channel' to reach its financially capable readership for their
products and services (example edition av
27 matches
Mail list logo
