On 05/05/2011 08:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Holger Brunck, > > In message <4dc253a5.6010...@keymile.com> you wrote: >> >>> As the merge window is closed, this new patch series will not go into >>> this upcoming release any more. >> >> Sorry but why this? The initial patch serie was postet on april 8th: >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/090012.html >> And as far as I know the merge window was closed on april 10th. >> >> The resulting patch series are a rework due to the input of the ML. > > The reworked series goes in, but there appear to be a number of > completely new patches; these go into next. >
yes if there is something completely new it goes into next. But both reworked series posted from myside have no new patches and no new features inside the patches. Ok two patches are squashed to one, as a result of an input from your side and I thought this was ok. If you still see something let me know and I remove it from the serie. So back to my original question should I post a bugfix patch for the compile issue for mgcoge2ne and rebase the serie "[PATCH v2 0/7] km82xx mainlining" above this patch or is it ok if it get fixed with this serie? Best regards Holger Brunck _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
