On 02/09/2011 12:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c | 10 -
> include/configs/mx31pdk.h |6 +++
> nand_spl/board/freescale/mx31pdk/u-boot.lds | 59 +++---
> 3 files change
On 02/09/2011 12:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Use board_early_init_f so that the full boot log output can be displayed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c |7 ++-
> include/configs/mx31pdk.h |1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1
Hi Albert,
please pull from u-boot-imx.
The following changes since commit 42d44f631c4e8e5359775bdc098f2fffde4e5c05:
Prepare v2011.03-rc1 (2011-02-02 22:37:32 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
Fabio Estevam (2):
mx31pdk: Use th
Le 13/02/2011 10:56, Stefano Babic a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> please pull from u-boot-imx.
>
> The following changes since commit 42d44f631c4e8e5359775bdc098f2fffde4e5c05:
>
>Prepare v2011.03-rc1 (2011-02-02 22:37:32 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>git://www.denx.de/git/
Le 13/02/2011 12:25, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> Le 13/02/2011 10:56, Stefano Babic a écrit :
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> please pull from u-boot-imx.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 42d44f631c4e8e5359775bdc098f2fffde4e5c05:
>>
>> Prepare v2011.03-rc1 (2011-02-02 22:37:32 +0100)
>>
>> are avail
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Lei Wen,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> If your sdram is large enough, or the uboot code is small enough, you don't
>> need
>> the dram init. But begin at the TEXT_BASE still is a must.
>
> Hugh? You _always_ must make sure the R
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Madhavi Manchala
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Lei Wen,
>>
>> In message
>> you wrote:
>>>
>>> If your sdram is large enough, or the uboot code is small enough, you don't
>>> need
>>> the dram init. But begin at the TEX
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Lei Wen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Madhavi Manchala
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Lei Wen,
>>>
>>> In message
>>> you wrote:
If your sdram is large enough, or the uboot code is small enough,
Le 13/02/2011 15:22, Madhavi Manchala a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Lei Wen wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Madhavi Manchala
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Lei Wen,
In message
you wrote:
>
> If yo
On 02/12/2011 08:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 11/02/2011 19:58, Magnus Lilja a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> I've tested Fabio's patch series and it makes the i.MX31 PDK boot nicely
>> from NAND again. So from my point of view I
>> recommend to use these patches.
>
> Which is the ideal case for sendin
On 02/12/2011 08:23 PM, Aaron Williams wrote:
> There's in_xxx/out_xxx, __raw_readx/__raw_writex and readx/writex. What
> exactly is the difference between all of these? It looks like the in/out was
> added recently and is not present in the mips io.h file.
In the MIPS code, 'mips_io_port_base
Hi Madhavi ,
Assuming through JTAG sdram has been initialized; try loading the "u-boot"
- the ELF file generated while you compiled u-boot not u-boot.bin.
FYI , example of files generated when u-boot is compiled
file u-boot*
u-boot: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), st
Am 02/07/2011 09:54 PM, schrieb Graeme Russ:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Michael Schwingen
> wrote:
>> Am 02/05/2011 12:52 AM, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>>> Dear Michael Schwingen,
>>>
>>> In message <1296860763-16149-1-git-send-email-mich...@schwingen.org> you
>>> wrote:
here is the thir
Hi Marcel,
I think your best bet right now is to use the nvflash tool provided in
the Chromium chroot. That's what the burn-u-boot script uses (by the way,
that script recently changed to write_tegra_bios (I know, bad name), and
will probably change again to something like cros_write_firmware
Add support for Bluewater Systems AT91 based Snapper 9260 and 9G20
single board computer modules. Includes NAND flash and Ethernet
support.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon
---
Build and run tested with new changes.
Changes for v4:
- Rebased on atmel/rework110202 branch
- Changed text base to 0x20
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Michael Schwingen
wrote:
> Am 02/07/2011 09:54 PM, schrieb Graeme Russ:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Michael Schwingen
>> wrote:
>>> Am 02/05/2011 12:52 AM, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Michael Schwingen,
In message <1296860763-16149-1-git-send
From: Marcel
These patches apply to u-boot-usb, cdc-at91 branch.
They contain a working implementation of USB DFU.
Most is documented in README.dfu.
A little background on the implementation :
The controller code (atmel_usba_udc) should also work with the gadget ethernet
driver. I tested it a co
From: Marcel
Atmel USBA UDC cleanup
Atmel USBA UDC cleanup
more cleanup of Atmel USBA UDC
Some more cleaning of Atmel USBA UDC
further cleaning of Atmel USBA UDC
Signed-off-by: Marcel
---
drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile |1 +
drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 1438 +
From: Marcel
USB DFU driver cleaning phase1
USB DFU driver cleaning phase2
USB DFU driver cleaning phase3
USB DFU driver cleaning phase4
Signed-off-by: Marcel
---
common/update_dfu.c | 89 +++
doc/README.dfu| 129
drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile |9 +
dri
From: Marcel
sam9g45_oem cleanup phase1
sam9g45_oem cleanup phase2
sam9g45_oem cleanup phase3
Signed-off-by: Marcel
---
board/in-circuit/icnova/Makefile | 50 ++
board/in-circuit/icnova/icnova_sam9g45.c | 242
boards.cfg
From: Marcel
Signed-off-by: Marcel
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/led.c | 119 +-
common/Makefile |1 +
common/update_dfu.c |2 -
drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c |8 +-
drivers/usb/gadget/usbdfu.c |
From: Marcel
Signed-off-by: Marcel
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/led.c | 119 +-
common/Makefile |1 +
common/update_dfu.c |2 -
drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c |8 +-
drivers/usb/gadget/usbdfu.c |
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message you
wrote:
>
> For multi-patch series, you only need to put the revision history in the
> [00/nn] file - No need to individually annotate each and every patch
This is *wrong*.
See the Note at bullet 2 at
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_p
Hi,
I hope this one gets through correctly.
I know it's know what optimal as it should apply to the current 'work'
but I had some issues doing that and no time to find out what the issue is.
If possible, please apply to cdc-at91
If not, than I will be reviewing it in a couple of months I guess.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
>> For multi-patch series, you only need to put the revision history in the
>> [00/nn] file - No need to individually annotate each and every patch
>
> This is *wrong*.
>
> See the Note at bu
Hi,
Sorry to post this one twice.
It's seems exactly the same patch.
> From: Marcel
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/led.c | 119
> +- common/Makefile |
> 1 +
> common/update_dfu.c |2 -
Am 02/13/2011 11:03 PM, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>> For multi-patch series, you only need to put the revision history in the
>> [00/nn] file - No need to individually annotate each and every patch
> This is *wrong*.
>
> See the Note at bullet 2 at
> h
We had an extra '0x' in the output of the LAWAR header that would cause
output like:
LAWBAR11: 0x LAWAR0x11: 0x80f0001d
intead of:
LAWBAR11: 0x LAWAR11: 0x80f0001d
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
drivers/misc/fsl_law.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hi,
I am trying to write support for the DP83849 phy driver in the u-boot. My
development environment is based on MPC8313E powerpc controller.
I have add following in the tsec.c driver
struct phy_info phy_info_dp83849 = {
0x20005ca,
"NatSemi DP83849",
4,
(struct
Hi Albert/Wolfgang
Resending pull re quest for master branch
Please kindly pull
The following changes since commit 3b66ae65d7f9b18f281ae975a075b991048c8864:
Albert Aribaud (1):
Merge remote branch 'u-boot-imx/master'
are available in the git repository at:
u-boot-marvell.git ma
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Srinath Iyengar
wrote:
> Hi Madhavi ,
>
>
>
> Assuming through JTAG sdram has been initialized; try loading the "u-boot"
> - the ELF file generated while you compiled u-boot not u-boot.bin.
>
> FYI , example of files generated when u-boot is compiled
>
> file u-b
Le 13/02/2011 21:37, Ryan Mallon a écrit :
> Add support for Bluewater Systems AT91 based Snapper 9260 and 9G20
> single board computer modules. Includes NAND flash and Ethernet
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon
> ---
> Build and run tested with new changes.
>
> Changes for v4:
> - Rebased
Hi Prafulla,
Le 14/02/2011 07:58, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
> Hi Albert/Wolfgang
>
> Resending pull re quest for master branch
> Please kindly pull
> The following changes since commit 3b66ae65d7f9b18f281ae975a075b991048c8864:
>Albert Aribaud (1):
> Merge remote branch 'u-boot-i
33 matches
Mail list logo
