From: Naveen Krishna CH
Nand Flash, Ethernet, other features might need to configure the
SROMC registers accordingly.
The config_sromc() functions helps with this.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
---
Changes since V1:
1. Funtion config_sromc() is renamed to s5pc1xx_config_sromc().
Comments fr
From: Naveen Krishna CH
Add setup for ethernet on SMDKC100, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be
loaded over tftp.
The preinit function will configure GPIO (GPK0CON) & SROMC to look
for environment in SROM Bank 3.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
---
Changes since V1:
1. The CONFIG_BOOTP* and Net co
From: Naveen Krishna CH
Memory subsystem of S5PC100 handles SROM, SRAM, OneDRAM, OneNand,
NAND Flash, DDRs.
smc.h is a common place for the register description of Memory subsystem
of S5PC100.
Note: Only SROM related registers are descibed now.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
---
Changes since
Dirk Behme googlemail.com> writes:
>
> E.g. what I did for OMAP3 SPI driver:
>
> /* OMAP3 McSPI registers */
> struct mcspi_channel {
> unsigned int chconf;/* 0x2C, 0x40, 0x54, 0x68 */
> unsigned int chstat;/* 0x30, 0x44, 0x58, 0x6C */
> unsigned int
Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
> This NFMS register definion is wrong and more MX51 does not have such kind of
> NFMS register.
> Which is in I.MX25/35. Please remove it to avoid confusion.
Agree, removed.
Regards,
Stefano
--
=
DENX So
Liu Hui-R64343 wrote:
>> +/* return from mxc_nand_load */
>> +/* r12 saved upper lr*/
> Remove the comments "/* return from mxc_nand_load */" since it does not
> support external NAND boot.
Dropped, thanks.
Regards,
Stefano
--
===
Dear Naveen Krishna CH,
On 5 March 2010 17:15, wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> Nand Flash, Ethernet, other features might need to configure the
> SROMC registers accordingly.
> The config_sromc() functions helps with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
> ---
> Changes since V1:
>
>
Dear Naveen Krishna CH,
On 5 March 2010 17:16, wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> Add setup for ethernet on SMDKC100, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be
> loaded over tftp.
>
> The preinit function will configure GPIO (GPK0CON) & SROMC to look
> for environment in SROM Bank 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: N
Dear Naveen Krishna CH,
On 5 March 2010 17:15, wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> Memory subsystem of S5PC100 handles SROM, SRAM, OneDRAM, OneNand,
> NAND Flash, DDRs.
> smc.h is a common place for the register description of Memory subsystem
> of S5PC100.
> Note: Only SROM related registers
Dear Tom,
The following changes since commit f687ebf82dbe44dcde5901232ade4f19ecedbf58:
Minkyu Kang (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
Joonyoung Shim (1):
s3c64xx: Add ifdef
The patch add initial support for the Freescale i.MX51 processor
(family arm cortex_a8).
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Fred Fan
---
Changes since last version:
Comments by Liu Hui:
Removed comment on NAND (not yet supported)
from lowlevel_init.S
Moved is_soc_rev
The patch add header files to support the Freescale i.MX51
processor, setting definitions for internal registers.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Fred Fan
---
Changes since last version(V5):
Comments by Liu Hui:
Removed NFMS bit definition from imx-regs.h
Th
The patch adds initial support for the Freescale mx51evk board.
Network (FEC) and SD controller (fsl_esdhc) are supported.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Fred Fan
---
Changes since last version:
Moved is_soc_rev() to soc specific code (removed from mx51evk.c)
MAINTAINERS
Dear Arno Steffen,
In message <804f0d21003042336t222c9e65v18ab2f193ff3...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> I read that chapter and changed to
> set bootargs_nfs'setenv bootargs mem=128M console=ttyS2,115200n8
> noinitrd rw root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=${serverip}:/opt/rootfs, nolock'
> set boot_nfs
Strange question but I am using an OMAP 3530 and the boot process currently
is from TI's X-Loader to U-Boot to Linux.
What I want is to have two different versions of U-Boot, an extremely
optimized and small one (to reduce boot time) but then also a debug version
that has a built in device test su
El Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:09:11AM -0500 Rishi Dhupar ha dit:
> Strange question but I am using an OMAP 3530 and the boot process currently
> is from TI's X-Loader to U-Boot to Linux.
>
> What I want is to have two different versions of U-Boot, an extremely
> optimized and small one (to reduce bo
i posted an asm-generic version recently i think you should be able to
leverage ...
-mike
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On 05/03/2010 12:09, Rishi Dhupar wrote:
> Strange question but I am using an OMAP 3530 and the boot process currently
> is from TI's X-Loader to U-Boot to Linux.
>
> What I want is to have two different versions of U-Boot, an extremely
> optimized and small one (to reduce boot time) but then also
Hello Tom
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access
> * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
> ---
> This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset.
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
> ---
> against current git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx.git
>
> cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c | 17 +
> include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h |1 +
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boo
Heiko Schocher wrote:
> This patch adds support for the magnesium board from
> projectiondesign. This board uses i.MX27 SoC and has
> 8MB NOR flash, 128MB NAND flash, FEC ethernet controller
> integrated into i.MX27. As this port is based on
> the imx27lite port, common config options are collected
Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit f3651764e57e353251695691677bd95ba5a420bc:
> Frans Meulenbroeks (1):
> cmd_itest.c: fix pointer dereferencing
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx master
>
> John Rigby (5):
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:55 AM
>> To: h...@denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm, suen3: fix compile error, if doing
>> not a local bu
Vipin KUMAR wrote:
> From: Vipin Kumar
>
> Supporting new machine ids for SoCs spear310 and spear320
>
> include/asm-arm/mach-types.h has to be updated before applying
> this patch for build to work
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar
I have applied just this patch to ARM.
Patch 1 is outstanding
T
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Vipin KUMAR,
>
> In message <4b8f5122.60...@st.com> you wrote:
>> On 3/3/2010 8:26 PM, Tom wrote:
> ...
>>> Please move this up to be after
>>> Sangmoon Kim
>>>
>>> debrisMPC8245
>>> KVME080MPC8245
>>>
>> This is under Power PC systems section.
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Hello Tom
>
> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>> * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access
>> * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
>> ---
>> This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset.
>> http://lists.denx
Tom wrote:
> This has been applied to ARM/master
> The fixes for the warning expected but not required.
> Thanks,
> Tom
Thanks, Tom. You are faster as I can send a git-pull-request ;)
In fact, I have an hour ago updated the u-boot-imx branch, pulling the
modified patches to remove warnings (patch
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:25 PM
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: kirkwood: suen3: fixed
Tom wrote:
> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>> Hello Tom
>>
>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>>> * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access
>>> * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
>>> ---
>>> This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset.
Stefano Babic wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>> This has been applied to ARM/master
>> The fixes for the warning expected but not required.
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>
> Thanks, Tom. You are faster as I can send a git-pull-request ;)
>
> In fact, I have an hour ago updated the u-boot-imx branch, pulling the
> modif
In case you did not read the imx message,
I am going to send a pull request this weekend.
On my queue.
samsung pull request
Possibles.
marvell
imx
otc
Please ping me if i am missing something.
Thanks
Tom
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
ht
Tom wrote:
> I think the best thing to do is to send me a pull request soon when you
> think the imx branch is in good shape. I noticed, but did not apply, some
> of the imx changes that came after your first pull request. These should
> be included in the next pull request.
Ok, thanks. I send
Tom,
this is the updated pull-request for u-boot-imx. Warnings from mx51evk
were removed and the magnesium board was added (acked by Wolfgang to get
it in the release).
The following changes since commit f3651764e57e353251695691677bd95ba5a420bc:
Frans Meulenbroeks (1):
cmd_itest.c: fix
signature
database 4918 (20100305) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Can someone tell me what CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH does?
The reason I ask is that I'm trying to use
CONFIG_CFI_FLASH_USE_WEAK_ACCESSORS, but I noticed that the "md"
command does not use the flash_readX primitives when I ask it to
display memory from a flash address. In examining do_mem_md(), I
noticed
Tom,
this is the pull request after you have already merged part of u-boot-imx.
The following changes since commit 75b464b721408cd8b26ba92a249f0726f37c7249:
John Rigby (1):
Add support for KARO TX25 board
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx master
H
All,
I found that fit_check_format() was causing a segfault when run on a
corrupt FIT image. I tracked the problem down to line 92 in
libfdt/fdt_ro.c in _fdt_string_eq():
return (strlen(p) == len) && (memcmp(p, s, len) == 0);
In the case of a corrupt FIT image one can't depend on 'p' being NULL
The size differences are substantial. 170 K for the regular uboot binary
and about 1.1 MB for the uboot binary with diagnostic software.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> El Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:09:11AM -0500 Rishi Dhupar ha dit:
>
> > Strange question but I am using
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message you
wrote:
> Can someone tell me what CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH does?
I know this sounds like an act of darin, but how about having a look
at the README ?
[And I really wonder why you did not find the documentation there.]
> The reason I ask is that I'm trying to use
>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Timur Tabi,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>> Can someone tell me what CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH does?
>
> I know this sounds like an act of darin, but how about having a look
> at the README ?
>
> [And I really wonder why you did not find the documentation there.]
On Saturday 20 February 2010 04:37:17 Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:30:32AM +0300, Maxim Podbereznyi wrote:
> > Hi Philippe!
> >
> > May be it is a little bit tricky but you can just read the u-boot
> > environment from you Linux driver and use the "ethaddr" variable. I di
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit f687ebf82dbe44dcde5901232ade4f19ecedbf58:
> Minkyu Kang (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
>
> Joon
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message <4b915a1f.90...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH
>
> Defining this option enables DataFlash features and
> allows to read/write in Dataflash via the standard
> commands cp, md...
>
> This doesn't tell me anything.
Hm... What
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> This doesn't tell me anything.
>
> Hm... What exactly don't you understand here?
Well, I was just wondering what the connection is between DataFlash (which is
some flash technology that I don't know much about) and the md command.
> Why are plain simple memory accesse
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Rishi Dhupar wrote:
> The size differences are substantial. 170 K for the regular uboot binary
> and about 1.1 MB for the uboot binary with diagnostic software.
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke
> wrote:
>
>> El Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:09:11AM
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 00:44:01 +0800
Hubin wrote:
> powerpc-eabi-ld:
> /home/Test/Softwares/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_G++_Lite/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-eabi/4.4.1/nof/libgcc.a(_udivdi3.o):
> compiled normally and linked with modules compiled with -mrelocatable
> powerpc-eabi-ld: failed to merg
Hi all,
I'm hunting for a __LOW COST__ MIPS/PPC SBC, something like TS-7200(but it
is for ARM). Could anyone please suggest me a good one, that you guys have
come across.
My purpose is only for general driver development, and developing some MIPS
/ PPC porting skills.
Also another true intension
47 matches
Mail list logo
