Add support for the ARM part of the mgcoge2. This board
is based on the Marvell Kirkwood (88F6281) SoC. As there
come more board variants, common code is stored in
board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
- changes
This patch adds support for the Keymile suen3 board which
is based on the Marvell Kirkwood (88F6281) SoC. As this
is a variant of the mgcoge2_arm_p1a board, this board
also uses common code stored in board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
- changes since v1:
added comme
This patch adds support for the Keymile suen3_p1a board which
is based on the Marvell Kirkwood (88F6281) SoC. As this
is a variant of the mgcoge2_arm_p1a board, this board
also uses common code stored in board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
- changes since v1:
added c
This patch adds support for the Keymile suen3_p1b_p1c board which
is based on the Marvell Kirkwood (88F6281) SoC. As this
is a variant of the mgcoge2_arm_p1a board, this board
also uses common code stored in board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
---
- changes since v1:
add
Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
On 10 February 2010 21:42, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> Memory subsystem of S5PC100 handles SROM, SRAM, OneDRAM, OneNand,
> NAND Flash, DDRs.
> mem.h is a common place for the register description of Memory subsystem
> of S5PC100.
> Note: Only SR
Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
On 11 February 2010 11:48, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> From: Naveen Krishna CH
>
> Nand Flash, Ethernet, other features might need to configure the
> SROMC registers accordingly.
> The config_sromc() functions helps with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
> ---
>
--- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
16:35:12.0 +0800
+++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
16:18:10.565540182 +0800
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; /* info for FLASH chips */
+extern s
On Friday 12 February 2010 09:31:17 Teh Kok How wrote:
> --- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
> 16:35:12.0 +0800
>
> +++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
> 16:18:10.565540182 +0800
>
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>
>
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
>
- What exactly are you trying to fix? Please add a small description
on what's broken and how your patch fixes it.
=> Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
and `protect` . This fix passes the correct part-id to the commands
so that `erase rootfs` and `protect ro
Fixes: Board_eth_init() calls pci_eth_init() (include/netdev.h) and if
ethernet is soc, CONFIG_PCI is not defined, pci_eth_init() returns 0.
This patch allows cpu_eth_init() to be called.
Signed-off-by: Kok How, Teh
--- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/net/eth.c 2010-01-25 16:35:12.0 +0800
+++
El Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:01:26AM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> > i gave my ack after a visual review of the patch, without having
> > tested it. i just installed a patched u-boot on one of my boards and
> > it doesn't boot :(
>
> Oh. The opposite of my board.
>
> Then, since I don't have a
This patch adds support the GPIO interface
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
---
cpu/arm_cortexa8/s5pc1xx/Makefile |1 +
cpu/arm_cortexa8/s5pc1xx/gpio.c | 143 +++
include/asm-arm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h | 29 +++
3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 0 deleti
Because adds support the GPIO Interface, README file is updated.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
---
doc/README.s5pc1xx | 18 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/README.s5pc1xx b/doc/README.s5pc1xx
index 5a0fe33..ab1f024 100644
--- a/doc/README.s5p
On Friday 12 February 2010 10:16:36 Teh Kok How wrote:
> - What exactly are you trying to fix? Please add a small description
> on what's broken and how your patch fixes it.
> => Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
> and `protect` . This fix passes the correct
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi Wolfgang, Hi Tom,
> Fred Fan, our so-far custodian for the Freescale (i.MX) ARM
> architecture systems, just informed me that he cannot longer perform
> this work.
>
> Any volunteers to help out?
I have not seen up now a big race to catch this job and I would
Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
and `protect` . This fix passes the correct part-id to the commands
so that `erase rootfs` and `protect rootfs` work.
Signed-off-by: Kok How, Teh
--- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
16:35:12.0
HI Kang,
Thanks for your comments,
On 12 February 2010 13:48, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
>
> On 10 February 2010 21:42, Naveen Krishna Ch
> wrote:
> > From: Naveen Krishna CH
> >
> > Memory subsystem of S5PC100 handles SROM, SRAM, OneDRAM, OneNand,
> > NAND Flash, DDRs.
> > me
HI Kang,
Thanks for your comments.
On 12 February 2010 13:50, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
>
> On 11 February 2010 11:48, Naveen Krishna Ch
> wrote:
> > From: Naveen Krishna CH
> >
> > Nand Flash, Ethernet, other features might need to configure the
> > SROMC registers according
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Kevin,
>
> On 12 February 2010 05:29, kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/02/2010 19:04, Tom wrote:
>>> Kevin Morfitt wrote:
Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
to lower-case.
Signed-off-by:
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>>> Hello Tom,
>>>
>>> Tom wrote:
Jens Scharsig wrote:
> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
> to c structures
Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
On 12 February 2010 19:38, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> HI Kang,
> Thanks for your comments.
> On 12 February 2010 13:50, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>
>> Dear Naveen Krishna Ch,
>>
>> On 11 February 2010 11:48, Naveen Krishna Ch
>> wrote:
>> > From: Naveen Krishna CH
>> >
>> > N
s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
> The following changes since commit 2f8f29f5f6f86b7c467a98508d02a28df735d1ee:
> Sandeep Paulraj (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master
>
> Nick Thompso
s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Please accept this version of my pull request.
>
> The following changes since commit 2f8f29f5f6f86b7c467a98508d02a28df735d1ee:
> Sandeep Paulraj (1):
> Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
Hello Teh Kok How,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Teh Kok How wrote:
> No, it is a bug. Board_eth_init() calls pci_eth_init() (include/netdev.h)
> and if ethernet is soc, CONFIG_PCI is not defined, pci_eth_init() returns
> 0.
> This patch allows cpu_eth_init() to be called.
>
> Sorry, still no
Dear "Teh Kok How",
In message <89d4e2cb6b654b3fb0da6a0ce6650...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
>
> --- u-boot-2009.11.1.orig/common/cmd_flash.c2010-01-25
> 16:35:12.0 +0800
> +++ u-boot-2009.11.1.new/common/cmd_flash.c 2010-02-12
> 16:18:10.565540182 +0800
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>
>
Hi everybody,
I wonder how I can flash a ubi rootfs image into my NAND flash by using u-boot
to do this?
The doc inside u-boot doesn't show me some readme and also google doesn't have
some interesting links for me.
The online help of the ubi commands is "a bit crypted " - at least for me and
t
Dear "Teh Kok How",
In message <9bae6a5e771e47c99977f5057f7b3...@smartbridges.com> you wrote:
> Fixes wrong argument to mtd_id_parse that affects u-boot command `erase`
> and `protect` . This fix passes the correct part-id to the commands
> so that `erase rootfs` and `protect rootfs` work.
>
>
>
Hi all,
I'm not really sure as to the protocol for asking this question. So I'll go
right ahead.
I've seen code on the web written by open moko that tries to address the
issue of adding BBT creation to the uboot nand command. I looked at the
latest released uboot (2009.11.1) and I don't see the "
Dear Steven Zedeck,
In message <27565331.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote:
>
> I've seen code on the web written by open moko that tries to address the
> issue of adding BBT creation to the uboot nand command. I looked at the
> latest released uboot (2009.11.1) and I don't see the "createbbt" supp
Hello Dieter,
> I wonder how I can flash a ubi rootfs image into my NAND flash by
> using u-boot to do this?
>
> The doc inside u-boot doesn't show me some readme and also google
> doesn't have some interesting links for me. The online help of the
> ubi commands is "a bit crypted " - at least for
Hi Stefano,
> I do not know how you plan the next step, but please feel free to ask me
> how can I help.
Well, we are just packaging one of those stylish "custodian hats" which
you will be likely to wear a lot in the foreseeable future and send it
off to you :)
No honestly, as I do not see any n
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:49:33PM -0800, Steven Zedeck wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I know this message is about 18 months old. I am using Uboot 2008.10, which
> seems to not include support for creating the Nand BBT (bad block table).
> Was this patch released and if so when? Forgive me as I don't know how
hi alessandro,
El Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:23:58AM +0100 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit:
> El Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:01:26AM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
>
> > > i gave my ack after a visual review of the patch, without having
> > > tested it. i just installed a patched u-boot on one of my boards a
>
> Hi,
> I know this message is about 18 months old. I am using Uboot 2008.10,
> which
> seems to not include support for creating the Nand BBT (bad block table).
> Was this patch released and if so when? Forgive me as I don't know how to
> find out.
>
> How best to add BBT support to Uboot? I
Steven Zedeck wrote:
>> U-Boot supports creating a bad block table in flash, and has done so since
>> before 2008.10 (assuming you're not using legacy NAND). Whether it does
>> this depends on whether the NAND driver requests it with NAND_BBT_CREATE
>> in
>> nand_bbt_descr.options and NAND_USE_FLA
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
>>> Hello Tom,
>>>
>>> Tom wrote:
Jens Scharsig wrote:
> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
> to c structures
>> U-Boot supports creating a bad block table in flash, and has done so since
>> before 2008.10 (assuming you're not using legacy NAND). Whether it does
>> this depends on whether the NAND driver requests it with NAND_BBT_CREATE
>> in
>> nand_bbt_descr.options and NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT in nand_chip.
Steven Zedeck wrote:
> First of all, I inherited much of this code, especially the NAND-related
> stuff. I've never needed to go into this portion of the code.
>
> It seems we are using the mtd driver as all our files dealing with nand are
> in drivers/mtd/nand. The only place I see NAND_USE_FLASH
> No, I mean in the NAND driver for your specific hardware
> (fsl_elbc_nand.c, mxc_nand.c, ndfc_nand.c, etc).
You have been so helpful. I looked at the mtd/nand/Makefile and the only
file that's included besides the nand* files is:
COBJS-y += fsl_upm.o
However, in that code:
#if defined(CONFI
Steven Zedeck wrote:
>
>
>> No, I mean in the NAND driver for your specific hardware
>> (fsl_elbc_nand.c, mxc_nand.c, ndfc_nand.c, etc).
>
> You have been so helpful. I looked at the mtd/nand/Makefile and the only
> file that's included besides the nand* files is:
>
> COBJS-y += fsl_upm.o
>
Wolfgang,
Please pull from arm/master.
Best regards,
Tom
The following changes since commit 0b692dcb190655c7eb96b6b8003bee163e3b58dd:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm mast
Steven Zedeck wrote:
>
>
> Steven Zedeck wrote:
>>
>>> No, I mean in the NAND driver for your specific hardware
>>> (fsl_elbc_nand.c, mxc_nand.c, ndfc_nand.c, etc).
>> You have been so helpful. I looked at the mtd/nand/Makefile and the only
>> file that's included besides the nand* files is:
>>
Hello Matthias.
I'm sorry I can't test before wednesday as I'll be offline.
I am doubtful, as usually precharge is done before setting mode, but
your chips are clearly different from mine, I now expect that no
sequence works for both of them.
/alessandro
__
Detlev Zundel denx.de> writes:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> > I do not know how you plan the next step, but please feel free to ask me
> > how can I help.
>
> Well, we are just packaging one of those stylish "custodian hats" which
> you will be likely to wear a lot in the foreseeable future and send it
Scott Wood-2 wrote:
>
> Steven Zedeck wrote:
>>
>>
>> Steven Zedeck wrote:
>>>
No, I mean in the NAND driver for your specific hardware
(fsl_elbc_nand.c, mxc_nand.c, ndfc_nand.c, etc).
>>> You have been so helpful. I looked at the mtd/nand/Makefile and the only
>>> file that's incl
Many of these lists are on sale too. Just email me here:
jeffery.p...@choicemedicaldata.net
to subtract your address from our databa#se look here please email
disapp...@choicemedicaldata.net
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http:
Hi Heiko
Pls find my inlined comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:36 PM
> To: U-Boot user list
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Stefan Roese
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4 v4] arm: add support for the
> mg
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:36 PM
> To: U-Boot user list
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Stefan Roese
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v4] arm: add support for the suen3 board
> from keymile
>
> This pa
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:36 PM
> To: U-Boot user list
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Stefan Roese
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4 v4] arm: add support for the suen3_p1a
> board from keymile
>
> Thi
49 matches
Mail list logo
