> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include "mv88e61xx.h"
> > +
> > +/* Chip Address mode
> > + * The Switch support two modes of operation
> > + * 1. single chip mode and
> > + * 2. Multi-chip mode
> > + * Refer section 9.2 &9.3 in chip datasheet-02 for more details
> > + *
> > + * By default sing
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:22:31PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Jon Smirl,
> >
> > In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com>
> > you wrote:
> >>
> >> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should supp
Hi,
We are using u-boot for our custom board having MPC8548. Board is able to
come up properly.
MPC connected to DSP via (MPC : RGMII)-SGMII-SGMII-(RGMII : DSP).
We are able to send packets from MPC to DSP successfully, but when DSP
intern sends back to MPC
we are getting below error on u-boot
Chips supported:-
1. 88E6161 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6165 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6132 3 port gbe swtich with 2 integrated PHYs
Platform specific configuration supported
default and router port vlan config supported
Note: This driver is supported and t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > How can you possibly ever change the API for the flash driver with 201
> > different flash drivers in the tree without marking something as broken?
>
> Well, *if* we wanted to change the API, that would be a reason to get
> rid of t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > One of these boards is the Auerswald Innokom, a board Robert once
> > ported. We probably still have it somewhere @Pengutronix, but nobody in
> > the world has any interest in running a top of tree U-Boot on it. Still
> > it is in t
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:18:21PM -0400, Bill Cook wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: saschaha...@web.de [mailto:saschaha...@web.de]on Behalf Of Sascha
> > Hauer
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:57 PM
> > To: Bill Cook
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Build er
Hello Ladislav
Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> One of these boards is the Auerswald Innokom, a board Robert once
>>> ported. We probably still have it somewhere @Pengutronix, but nobody in
>>> the world has any interest in running a top of
Hello Jean-Christophe,
I'm not sure, but I think there is a bug in your new at91 clock framework.
My board does only boot, if CONFIG_USB_ATMEL is defined. But the board does
not have any usb-ports, so there is no need to define CONFIG_USB_ATMEL.
The board is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Is
Hello Heiko!
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:53:46AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Ladislav
>
> Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > May I? Last time I looked at mainline U-Boot about year ago, sending few
> > patches and it was working for me. Since then some changes (only minor ones
> > from design pesp
> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:04 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
>
> Dear Premi,
>
> Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> >> -O
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
> cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>>
>>> In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
>>
>> So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
Dear Robert,
In message <20090422071711.gh5...@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> > > One of these boards is the Auerswald Innokom, a board Robert once
> > > ported. We probably still have it somewhere @Pengutronix, but nobody in
> > > the world has any interest in running a top of tree U-Boot on it.
I'm having trouble booting my linux image over a nfs share.
The share is on an openSuse 11 server. I am able to mount the folder on a
centOS machine
and copy the file over the network so I believe it is setup properly. My
UBoot output is
File transfer via NFS from server xxx.xxx.50.21; our IP a
Dear Ladislav,
In message <20090422132536.ga2...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
> > What else should a maintainer do? He have not all boards to try the
> > new code! You can just look at Coding Style, clean compile and maybe
> > he see, that this Code couldn;t work ...
>
> That's perfectly
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[snip]
> There are broken boards around, too - of course. There are those
> board maintainers who simply dump their stuff on us and then never
> show up again with any contributions any more.
>
> I don't know how we could prevent that. It's probably happening with
>
Hello,
the following patch set
introduced a new common video driver (patch part 1)
and
update current boards (EB+MCF-EV123) to use it (patch part 2).
this driver is also used for upcomming new boards with vcxk hardware.
regard
Jens Scharsig
__
This patch updates the support for EB+MCF-EV123 board
and needs the [PATCH 1/2] new video driver for bus vcxk framebuffers
* remove the board framebuffer driver
* use the common bus_vcxk framebuffer driver
* adds bmp support
* adds splashimage support
* fix serveral cosmetical errors
Signed-o
This patch adds a new video driver
* adds common bus_vcxk framebuffer driver
Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
---
diff --git a/doc/README.bus_vcxk b/doc/README.bus_vcxk
new file mode 100644
index 000..44e1238
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/README.bus_vcxk
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2008-2
Ladislav Michl wrote:
> Let CONFIG_SYS_HZ to have value of 1000 effectively fixing all users of
> get_timer.
>
> Changes since original version:
> * Set PTV=2 (divisor 8) for boards using 12MHz timer clock source to
> improve timer resolution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl
Acked-by: Dirk
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Ben Warren wrote:
> This driver uses the old-style API and so requires board/cpu init code to
> call eth_init(). I'm not familiar with your architecture, so don't know how
> or if this is implemented, but it should be easy to find another example
> that does this
Hello,
2009/4/22 Kyo Yin :
> hi remy
> with your help, i have add my code to uboot and the probe can work. but
> i still have some questions.
Great!
> 1. After probe, in kernel, i will wait the interrupt generated by insert
> usb cable , but in uboot, we don`t have interrupt, so how do y
Hi,
Does u-boot support F9 hot key? or I have to modified keyboard.c driver in
u-boot?
Connie
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:04 AM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
Dear Premi,
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-
Dear yanfeng qin,
In message <254f00050904220819k4f029aa5oa62d4bb6a5eda...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Does u-boot support F9 hot key? or I have to modified keyboard.c driver in
> u-boot?
By default, U-Boot uses a serial (RS-232) console port.
I have not the slightest idea what you might mea
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:52:40AM -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> Now things seem to initialize properly:
>
> U-Boot 2009.03 (Apr 22 2009 - 07:28:04)
>
> OMAP3503-GP rev 2, CPU-OPP2 L3-165MHz
> Gumstix Overo board + LPDDR/NAND
> DRAM: 256 MB
> NAND: 256 MiB
> In:serial
> Out: serial
> Err:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:51:44PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:52:40AM -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > Now things seem to initialize properly:
> >
> > U-Boot 2009.03 (Apr 22 2009 - 07:28:04)
> >
> > OMAP3503-GP rev 2, CPU-OPP2 L3-165MHz
> > Gumstix Overo board + LPDDR/N
Hi all,
I have some questions regarding start.S code for arm926ejs. Looking at the
relocation code of u-boot:
relocate: /* relocate U-Boot to RAM*/
adrr0, _start/* r0 <- current position of code */
ldrr1, _TEXT_BASE/* test if we run f
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:38:27PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I was hoping that I could use that to test some NAND code, but
> then I noticed it wasn't implemented. I would have expected that
> U-Boot command wouldn't exist until they're implemented...
Sorry about that. :-(
It probably exist
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> How did you set this MAC address? Does the hardware read it from a
>> connected EEPROM or did you manually set it in your environment.
It is manually set in the environment since the prototype hardware
doesn't have the eeprom.
>> If you
>>
I am in the middle of NAND debugging on a MPC8544 based system.
In the following code for the mpc8360erdk, why is there
the instruction "out_8(upm->io_addr, 0x0);" in the for loop.
Is that board specific?
static void upm_setup(struct fsl_upm *upm)
{
int i;
/* write upm array */
out_
Hi Christopher,
christopher.mcnamara wrote:
> I'm having trouble booting my linux image over a nfs share.
> The share is on an openSuse 11 server. I am able to mount the folder on a
> centOS machine
> and copy the file over the network so I believe it is setup properly. My
> UBoot output is
>
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:31:52AM -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> >> How did you set this MAC address? Does the hardware read it from a
> >> connected EEPROM or did you manually set it in your environment.
>
> It is manually set in the environment since the prototype hardware
> doesn't have the eep
Hi,
Renaud barbier wrote:
> I am in the middle of NAND debugging on a MPC8544 based system.
>
> In the following code for the mpc8360erdk, why is there
> the instruction "out_8(upm->io_addr, 0x0);" in the for loop.
it is a dummy write transaction step of the UPM RAM array
programming algorithm
It is a microblaze on a Xilinx Virtex 5. Not sure what the MAC is
unless it is built into the VITESSE vsc8211 PHY...
The only code on the machine at this time is the UBoot 1.2 image, no
linux kernel.
I was led to believe by the documentation that I could boot the whole
image via nfs, I am faced w
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:44:48AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> >Dear Kumar Gala,
> >
> >In message <93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
> >cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> >>
> >>>In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
Hi all,
For all Timer modification a minimun of qualification is mandatory
as it will impact a lots of part of u-boot.
So for this purpose I'll propose you to use one of this two approche
to report the precition of your timer or update
1) Clock generation
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <20090422204936.gb29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> For all Timer modification a minimun of qualification is mandatory
> as it will impact a lots of part of u-boot.
Maybe you could be so kind and explain what this is actually ab
On 21:53 Tue 21 Apr , Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> The function display_board_info() displays the silicon
> revision as 2 - based on the return value from get_cpu_rev().
>
> This is incorrect as the current Si version is 3.1
>
> This patch displays the correct version; but does not
> change get_cpu
On 23:08 Wed 22 Apr , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>
> In message <20090422204936.gb29...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > For all Timer modification a minimun of qualification is mandatory
> > as it will impact a lots of part of u-boot.
>
> Mayb
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <20090422212816.ga18...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> > Who needs this, and why and when, and why didn't we need it the past?
> a lot of actual timer are not correct and we have problem on network timeout
> as example.
Hm... how muich of preci
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>>> How did you set this MAC address? Does the hardware read it from a
>>> connected EEPROM or did you manually set it in your environment.
>
> It is manually set in the environment sinc
Hi Drasko DRASKOVIC,
"adr" is to calculate a runtime address by PC+offset.
"adr r0, _start" is like:
"add r0, pc, #0x80" for example.
e.g. TEXT_BASE == 0x1000 and you are using u-boot to boot from flash.
link address of _start probably equals to 0x1000
the location _armboot_start stor
I got a new board with 1GB DDRII memory and only 1 Rank, but the problem still
exist.
The following is a summary of my job:
1. My board combines 4 Hynix H5PS2G83AFR (256MB * 8bits) to make a 1GB memory,
use only one 1 rank, no ECC.
2. My board is similar to AMCC Kilauea EVB. For U-Boot-2
Hi Prafulla,
So close...
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> +/* Chip Address mode
> + * The Switch support two modes of operation
> + * 1. single chip mode and
> + * 2. Multi-chip mode
> + * Refer section 9.2 &9.3 in chip datasheet-02 for more details
> + *
> + * By default single chip mode is configure
Daniel Mack wrote:
> If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
> hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
> Cc: Sascha Hauer
> ---
> drivers/net/smc911x.c |9 +++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/driv
Daniel Mack wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
> Cc: Sascha Hauer
> ---
> drivers/net/smc911x.h |2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.h b/drivers/net/smc911x.h
> index 80d2ce0..2b01cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h
> +++ b/driv
Hi Christopher,
Please don't top-post.
Christopher McNamara wrote:
> It is a microblaze on a Xilinx Virtex 5. Not sure what the MAC is
> unless it is built into the VITESSE vsc8211 PHY...
>
>
I've never used this configuration, but assume it's using some kind of
Xilinx-provided soft MAC. It
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:18:00AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
>
> In message <20090422212816.ga18...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
> >
> > > Who needs this, and why and when, and why didn't we need it the past?
> > a lot of actual timer are not correct and
On 4/22/09 10:00 PM, SunNeo wrote:
> I got a new board with 1GB DDRII memory and only 1 Rank, but the problem still
> exist.
>
> The following is a summary of my job:
>
> 4. Have performed memory test with "mtest" command at U-Boot, no error
>happened.
Sun:
It's been awhile since I looked
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:20:15PM -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> Files longer that 544 bytes result in a timeout error:
>
> Overo # tftp test.txt
> smc911x: initializing
> smc911x: detected LAN9221 controller
> smc911x: phy initialized
> smc911x: MAC aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff
> TFTP from server 192.168.0.
51 matches
Mail list logo
